← Каталог сценариев
geopolitical··severity 9

Ядерные державы увеличивают количество боеголовок, предупреждает SIPRI

Государства мира, обладающие ядерным оружием, все чаще перемещают боеголовки из хранилищ в оперативные системы доставки, что повышает риск конфликта, несмотря на постепенное сокращение общих запасов, предупредили исследователи в понедельник. В SIPRI заявили, что геополитическое соперничество и новое наращивание вооружений могут обратить вспять десятилетия сокращений ядерных арсеналов.

Сценарии цепочки

A

Escalation

50%

## Scenario Analysis **Scenario A (Escalation) — 50%** * **Chain:** Increased geopolitical tensions between nuclear powers trigger direct military exercises near disputed territories. A series of escalating incidents, including false flag operations and cyberattacks, escalate tensions further. This leads to a heightened state of alert and potential for accidental escalation. * **Confirmation indicators:** A public statement from the US or Russia directly threatening another country's nuclear capabilities. Increased NATO activity near Russian borders. * **Time horizon:** 30-60 days **Scenario B (Status Quo) — 38%** * **Chain:** The global community continues to focus on diplomatic efforts and international negotiations aimed at reducing nuclear tensions. SIPRI research is published, but political will remains weak in the face of competing national interests. * **Confirmation indic

Индикаторы подтверждения: ** A public statement from the US or Russia directly threatening another country's nuclear capabilities. Increased NATO activity near Russian borders., * **Time horizon:** 30, 60 days
B

Status Quo

38%

## Scenario Analysis **Scenario A (Escalation) — 50%** * **Chain:** Increased geopolitical tensions between nuclear powers trigger direct military exercises near disputed territories. A series of escalating incidents, including false flag operations and cyberattacks, escalate tensions further. This leads to a heightened state of alert and potential for accidental escalation. * **Confirmation indicators:** A public statement from the US or Russia directly threatening another country's nuclear capabilities. Increased NATO activity near Russian borders. * **Time horizon:** 30-60 days **Scenario B (Status Quo) — 38%** * **Chain:** The global community continues to focus on diplomatic efforts and international negotiations aimed at reducing nuclear tensions. SIPRI research is published, but political will remains weak in the face of competing national interests. * **Confirmation indic

Индикаторы подтверждения: ** A public statement from the US or Russia directly threatening another country's nuclear capabilities. Increased NATO activity near Russian borders., * **Time horizon:** 30, 60 days
C

De-escalation

13%

## Scenario Analysis **Scenario A (Escalation) — 50%** * **Chain:** Increased geopolitical tensions between nuclear powers trigger direct military exercises near disputed territories. A series of escalating incidents, including false flag operations and cyberattacks, escalate tensions further. This leads to a heightened state of alert and potential for accidental escalation. * **Confirmation indicators:** A public statement from the US or Russia directly threatening another country's nuclear capabilities. Increased NATO activity near Russian borders. * **Time horizon:** 30-60 days **Scenario B (Status Quo) — 38%** * **Chain:** The global community continues to focus on diplomatic efforts and international negotiations aimed at reducing nuclear tensions. SIPRI research is published, but political will remains weak in the face of competing national interests. * **Confirmation indic

Индикаторы подтверждения: ** A public statement from the US or Russia directly threatening another country's nuclear capabilities. Increased NATO activity near Russian borders., * **Time horizon:** 30, 60 days

Первичный источник: France24

Хотите получать такие сценарии в email или Telegram до публикации в каталоге?

Тарифы и подписки →