← Каталог сценариев
geopolitical··severity 6

США использовали информацию о боевых действиях на Украине для оценки потенциального конфликта в Азиатско-Тихоокеанском регионе

Генерал-лейтенант армии США Джозеф Райан заявил, что армия США также помогает контролировать нелегальную миграцию из Мексики

Сценарии цепочки

A

Escalation

50%

Scenario A (Escalation) — 50% Chain: US military actions in Ukraine escalate, leading to increased tensions with China and Russia. China's response involves increased naval activity near Taiwan, while Russia conducts joint military exercises with Syria and Iran. This triggers a heightened risk of miscalculation or escalation between these major powers. Confirmation indicators: 1) Increased Chinese military presence around the Taiwan Strait; 2) Public pronouncements from Russian officials regarding potential military action against NATO countries. Time horizon: 60-90 days. Scenario B (Status Quo) — 38% Chain: US continues to assess the geopolitical landscape of Asia Pacific, focusing on maintaining a balance between China and Russia. This includes diplomatic engagement with both nations while bolstering alliances like ASEAN. Confirmation indicators: 1) Conti

Индикаторы подтверждения: ** 1) Increased Chinese military presence around the Taiwan Strait; 2) Public pronouncements from Russian officials regarding potential military action against NATO countries. **Time horizon:** 60, 90 days., ## Scenario B (Status Quo) — 38%
B

Status Quo

38%

Scenario A (Escalation) — 50% Chain: US military actions in Ukraine escalate, leading to increased tensions with China and Russia. China's response involves increased naval activity near Taiwan, while Russia conducts joint military exercises with Syria and Iran. This triggers a heightened risk of miscalculation or escalation between these major powers. Confirmation indicators: 1) Increased Chinese military presence around the Taiwan Strait; 2) Public pronouncements from Russian officials regarding potential military action against NATO countries. Time horizon: 60-90 days. Scenario B (Status Quo) — 38% Chain: US continues to assess the geopolitical landscape of Asia Pacific, focusing on maintaining a balance between China and Russia. This includes diplomatic engagement with both nations while bolstering alliances like ASEAN. Confirmation indicators: 1) Conti

Индикаторы подтверждения: ** 1) Increased Chinese military presence around the Taiwan Strait; 2) Public pronouncements from Russian officials regarding potential military action against NATO countries. **Time horizon:** 60, 90 days., ## Scenario B (Status Quo) — 38%
C

De-escalation

13%

Scenario A (Escalation) — 50% Chain: US military actions in Ukraine escalate, leading to increased tensions with China and Russia. China's response involves increased naval activity near Taiwan, while Russia conducts joint military exercises with Syria and Iran. This triggers a heightened risk of miscalculation or escalation between these major powers. Confirmation indicators: 1) Increased Chinese military presence around the Taiwan Strait; 2) Public pronouncements from Russian officials regarding potential military action against NATO countries. Time horizon: 60-90 days. Scenario B (Status Quo) — 38% Chain: US continues to assess the geopolitical landscape of Asia Pacific, focusing on maintaining a balance between China and Russia. This includes diplomatic engagement with both nations while bolstering alliances like ASEAN. Confirmation indicators: 1) Conti

Индикаторы подтверждения: ** 1) Increased Chinese military presence around the Taiwan Strait; 2) Public pronouncements from Russian officials regarding potential military action against NATO countries. **Time horizon:** 60, 90 days., ## Scenario B (Status Quo) — 38%

Хотите получать такие сценарии в email или Telegram до публикации в каталоге?

Тарифы и подписки →