social demographic · sports

📌

Fifa accused of ‘crossing a line’ over $20bn plan to sell World Cup commercial rights

S7

World governing body set to raise millions from venture Uefa hits out at sale of football ‘soul and governance’ Fifa has announced plans to sell a share of its commercial operations to private investors, a deal that would include the media and sponsorship rights of all its competitions, including the World Cup. The world governing body is working with the US bank JPMorgan on setting up a new entity – to be called Fifa Forward Enterprise (FFE) – that would raise hundreds of millions of dollars by selling a significant stake in the commercial rights of the men’s and women’s World Cups, and the Club World Cup to investors, with promises of “over $10bn” (£7.5bn) then being redistributed back to Fifa’s 211 member associations. Fifa confirmed the move on Tuesday afternoon after reports in the Financial Times and the Times. Continue reading...

1 minute ago

social demographic · culture

📌

Tata Capital Q1 Results: Net profit jumps 56% YoY to Rs 1,547 crore, revenue up 15%

S6

Tata Capital announced a substantial net profit increase of over 56 percent. Revenue from operations also saw a healthy rise of more than 15 percent. Assets under management grew by 22 percent, reaching Rs 2.91 lakh crore. Net interest income and the net loan book experienced strong year-on-year growth. The company's net worth jumped approximately 42 percent during the quarter.

8 minutes ago

economic · economic

📉

Vedanta Aluminium shares in a sweet spot, says ICICI Securities; initiates coverage with Buy rating

S5

ICICI Securities has initiated coverage on Vedanta Aluminium Metal (VAML) with a 'Buy' rating and a target price of Rs 520, implying over 19% upside. The brokerage expects strong earnings growth, driven by favourable aluminium prices, higher volumes, backward integration and lower costs. It also sees robust cash generation, debt reduction and long-term expansion supporting the company's outlook.

9 minutes ago

geopolitical · geopolitical

⚔️

It’s ‘Chico’ time: Glasgow curry restaurateur ready to face ‘creme de la creme’ of lawn bowls

S6

Mohammed Ayub Qureshi has invited Pakistan’s opponents Australia for dinner at his restaurant – whatever the result The invitation has already been extended. Even if Australia beat Pakistan in their men’s pairs match at the Commonwealth Games, they are still welcome to dinner afterwards. There is just one small catch. “If we lose, they are still invited to the restaurant, but I will probably give them a spicy vindaloo as revenge,” Mohammed Ayub Qureshi says with a smile. Qureshi, better known around the city’s bowls community as “Chico”, has spent decades serving food at Alishan Tandoori while also becoming Pakistan’s most recognisable lawn bowler. On Wednesday the restaurateur swaps the shirt and tie for Pakistan colours as he and his teammate Maqsood Waseem Khan face one of the toughest assignments in the sport. Continue reading...

12 minutes ago

military · geopolitical

⚔️

Exclusive: Does the UK's 'don't talk to the Muslim Council of Britain' policy actually exist?

S9

Exclusive: Does the UK's 'don't talk to the Muslim Council of Britain' policy actually exist? Submitted by Imran Mulla on Tue, 07/28/2026 - 13:36 Relevant government departments hold no information on MCB 'non-engagement policy' cited by Burnham government Britain's new Prime Minister Andy Burnham gives his first speech in front of 10 Downing Street in central London on 20 July after being asked by the king to form the next government (AFP) Off Andy Burnham's government has said it is sticking to a policy of refusing to engage with the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) that it has inherited from previous governments. But a Middle East Eye analysis can reveal that the "non-engagement" policy appears to be a phantom, as no written records of an actual policy appear to exist. No relevant government department has taken responsibility for it - documents seen by Middle East Eye reveal that these departments say they do not hold any information on the alleged policy. It is unclear which department is even officially responsible for the declared policy, or what the official justification for the boycott of the MCB is. Multiple sources close to the government said that the new Burnham government is keen to mend relations with British Muslims, many of whom turned away from Labour during Keir Starmer's premiership. The questions surrounding the origins of the no-contact policy with the MCB come after it was revealed last week that a mosque is attacked in the UK every five days. But the boycotted MCB is the largest umbrella body claiming to represent British Muslim organisations, with more than 500 affiliates. The Telegraph reported on Monday that the Burnham government's new equalities minister, Sir Stephen Timms, spoke on a panel alongside an MCB representative last December. The Telegraph quoted a government spokesperson saying: "There has been no change to our non-engagement policy regarding the Muslim Council of Britain, and there are no plans for ministers to meet with the group.” But what exactly is the basis of this policy? Does anyone in government know? In search of the 'non-engagement policy' A recent response by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to a Freedom of Information Act request asking for any policy documents, guidance, finalised briefing notes or submissions to ministers "that set out or refer to a policy of non-engagement with the Muslim Council of Britain" offers no clues. The response, dated 16 June and seen by MEE, says "the information you requested is not held by the Department". How Andy Burnham can win back the Muslim voters Labour has lost Read More » A Cabinet Office response on 27 May to the same request, also seen by MEE, says "that following a search of our paper and electronic records, we have established that the information you requested is not held by the Cabinet Office". And a Home Office response on 22 June says: "We can confirm that no information is held that meets the criteria of your request." MEE has emailed the UK Office for Equality and Opportunity, which is part of the communities ministry, as well as the ministry itself, asking what exactly the non-engagement policy is and what the official justication is for not engaging with the MCB. A spokesperson for the MCB said: “This so-called policy of non-engagement is a historic relic. It was built to appease those who trade in Islamophobia, and it survives only by recycling decades-old allegations that have never withstood scrutiny." Prime Minister Burnham himself has previously engaged with the MCB, including giving a speech at an MCB Muslim Leadership Dinner in 2015. A search for the rumoured policy's origin So what is the exact origin of this elusive, rumoured policy of non-engagement? It is often reported that the policy has been in place since 2009. But this is untrue. That year the MCB was indeed briefly boycotted by Gordon Brown’s Labour government after its then deputy secretary general, Daud Abdullah, signed the so-called Istanbul Declaration in Turkey. According to the government, the declaration called for attacks on Royal Navy vessels if they tried to stop weapons for Hamas entering Gaza. Abdullah said : "I did not and do not condone calls for attacks on British troops.” Exclusive: UK told Karim Khan it would not back him as ICC prosecutor before removal vote Read More » The MCB denounced the statement, which it said was signed by Daud in a strictly personal capacity. Daud resigned and the Labour government resumed engagement with the organisation. Ministers in the coalition government also held meetings with the MCB between 2010 and 2015. Civil servants continued to meet with the MCB until March 2020. That was when the organisation produced a dossier outlining what it said was evidence of Islamophobia against more than 300 individuals, including Conservative MPs, councillors, party members and special advisers inside 10 Downing Street. That same month, civil servants reportedly broke off relations with the organisation - for unknown reasons. Yet even after that the MCB worked with the Ministry of Defence (MoD) by serving as a referee for imams applying to become military chaplains. But this was not public knowledge. In late October 2023, the Telegraph revealed that the MCB was working with the MoD. As a result , in early November that year, government ministers ordered the MoD to cut all ties with the MCB. In 2024 a major interfaith charity, the Inter Faith Network (IFN), was forced to close after the Conservative government withdrew its funding - because one of its trustees was an MCB member. Non-Muslims in Liverpool are protecting their local mosque from potential attacks as far-right rallies are expected to take place across the UK this weekend. pic.twitter.com/D5tO5C8GR4 — Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) August 3, 2024 The Labour government under Starmer then adopted the same approach. MEE revealed in July 2024 that the government had not been responding to communications from the MCB throughout the far-right riots which swept the country that summer. MEE also revealed last July that the government blocked a working group it set up to advise on a possible definition of Islamophobia from consulting the MCB. The alleged "non-engagement policy" itself has proved impossible to pin down. The MCB continues to have significant reach among Muslim civil society organisations and its leadership remains democratically elected. Whether Prime Minister Burnham - who spoke at an MCB dinner years six years after the claimed non-engagement policy began - will change course and engage with the organisation remains to be seen. UK Politics News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

16 minutes ago

military · geopolitical

⚔️

Israeli forces demolish eleven homes in occupied West Bank during past 24 hours

S8

Israeli forces demolish eleven homes in occupied West Bank during past 24 hours Eleven Palestinian homes have been destroyed in the past 24 hours by Israeli forces, Al Jazeera reported on Tuesday, citing local sources. Israeli settlers attacked three Palestinians, including an elderly woman, and blocked an ambulance from arriving in Masafer Yatta, while six Palestinians were detained in Nablus, the report added. Wafa news also reported on Tuesday that Israeli authorities issued four military orders to seize more than 22 dunams (2.2 hectares) of Palestinian-owned land in the towns of Arraba and Qabatiya, south of Jenin, claiming that it was required for military purposes. Israeli forces brought in additional mobile homes near to the Tayasir military checkpoint, east of Tubas, as part of plans to establish a new Israeli settlement in the area, Wafa reported, citing a local council leader. Palestinian children watch as Israeli forces oversee the demolition of a building in Anzah in the occupied West Bank on 27 July 2026 (Mohammad Mansour/AFP)

17 minutes ago

geopolitical · geopolitical

⚔️

Exclusive: Does the UK's 'don't talk to the Muslim Council of Britain' policy actually exist?

S6

Exclusive: Does the UK's 'don't talk to the Muslim Council of Britain' policy actually exist? Andy Burnham's government has said it is sticking to a policy of refusing to engage with the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) that it has inherited from previous governments. But a Middle East Eye analysis can reveal that the "non-engagement" policy appears to be a phantom, as no written records of an actual policy appear to exist. No relevant government department has taken responsibility for it - documents seen by Middle East Eye reveal that these departments say they do not hold any information on the alleged policy. It is unclear which department is even officially responsible for the declared policy, or what the official justification for the boycott of the MCB is. Multiple sources close to the government said that the new Burnham government is keen to mend relations with British Muslims, many of whom turned away from Labour during Keir Starmer's premiership. The questions surrounding the origins of the no-contact policy with the MCB come after it was revealed last week that a mosque is attacked in the UK every five days. But the boycotted MCB is the largest umbrella body claiming to represent British Muslim organisations, with more than 500 affiliates. Read more: Exclusive: Does the UK's 'don't talk to the Muslim Council of Britain' policy actually exist? Britain's new Prime Minister Andy Burnham gives his first speech in front of 10 Downing Street in central London on 20 July after being asked by the king to form the next government (AFP)

18 minutes ago

military · geopolitical

⚔️

Exclusive: Does the UK's 'don't talk to the Muslim Council of Britain' policy actually exist?

S9

Exclusive: Does the UK's 'don't talk to the Muslim Council of Britain' policy actually exist? Submitted by Imran Mulla on Tue, 07/28/2026 - 13:36 Relevant government departments hold no information on MCB 'non-engagement policy' cited by Burnham government Britain's new Prime Minister Andy Burnham gives his first speech in front of 10 Downing Street in central London on 20 July after being asked by the king to form the next government (AFP) Off Andy Burnham's government has said it is sticking to a policy of refusing to engage with the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) that it has inherited from previous governments. But a Middle East Eye analysis can reveal that the "non-engagement" policy appears to be a phantom, as no written records of an actual policy appear to exist. No relevant government department has taken responsibility for it - documents seen by Middle East Eye reveal that these departments say they do not hold any information on the alleged policy. It is unclear which department is even officially responsible for the declared policy, or what the official justification for the boycott of the MCB is. Multiple sources close to the government said that the new Burnham government is keen to mend relations with British Muslims, many of whom turned away from Labour during Keir Starmer's premiership. The questions surrounding the origins of the no-contact policy with the MCB come after it was revealed last week that a mosque is attacked in the UK every five days. But the boycotted MCB is the largest umbrella body claiming to represent British Muslim organisations, with more than 500 affiliates. The Telegraph reported on Monday that the Burnham government's new equalities minister, Sir Stephen Timms, spoke on a panel alongside an MCB representative last December. The Telegraph quoted a government spokesperson saying: "There has been no change to our non-engagement policy regarding the Muslim Council of Britain, and there are no plans for ministers to meet with the group.” But what exactly is the basis of this policy? Does anyone in government know? In search of the 'non-engagement policy' A recent response by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to a Freedom of Information Act request asking for any policy documents, guidance, finalised briefing notes or submissions to ministers "that set out or refer to a policy of non-engagement with the Muslim Council of Britain" offers no clues. The response, dated 16 June and seen by MEE, says "the information you requested is not held by the Department". How Andy Burnham can win back the Muslim voters Labour has lost Read More » A Cabinet Office response on 27 May to the same request, also seen by MEE, says "that following a search of our paper and electronic records, we have established that the information you requested is not held by the Cabinet Office". And a Home Office response on 22 June says: "We can confirm that no information is held that meets the criteria of your request." MEE has emailed the UK Office for Equality and Opportunity, which is part of the communities ministry, as well as the ministry itself, asking what exactly the non-engagement policy is and what the official justication is for not engaging with the MCB. A spokesperson for the MCB said: “This so-called policy of non-engagement is a historic relic. It was built to appease those who trade in Islamophobia, and it survives only by recycling decades-old allegations that have never withstood scrutiny." Prime Minister Burnham himself has previously engaged with the MCB, including giving a speech at an MCB Muslim Leadership Dinner in 2015. A search for the rumoured policy's origin So what is the exact origin of this elusive, rumoured policy of non-engagement? It is often reported that the policy has been in place since 2009. But this is untrue. That year the MCB was indeed briefly boycotted by Gordon Brown’s Labour government after its then deputy secretary general, Daud Abdullah, signed the so-called Istanbul Declaration in Turkey. According to the government, the declaration called for attacks on Royal Navy vessels if they tried to stop weapons for Hamas entering Gaza. Abdullah said : "I did not and do not condone calls for attacks on British troops.” Exclusive: UK told Karim Khan it would not back him as ICC prosecutor before removal vote Read More » The MCB denounced the statement, which it said was signed by Daud in a strictly personal capacity. Daud resigned and the Labour government resumed engagement with the organisation. Ministers in the coalition government also held meetings with the MCB between 2010 and 2015. Civil servants continued to meet with the MCB until March 2020. That was when the organisation produced a dossier outlining what it said was evidence of Islamophobia against more than 300 individuals, including Conservative MPs, councillors, party members and special advisers inside 10 Downing Street. That same month, civil servants reportedly broke off relations with the organisation - for unknown reasons. Yet even after that the MCB worked with the Ministry of Defence (MoD) by serving as a referee for imams applying to become military chaplains. But this was not public knowledge. In late October 2023, the Telegraph revealed that the MCB was working with the MoD. As a result , in early November that year, government ministers ordered the MoD to cut all ties with the MCB. In 2024 a major interfaith charity, the Inter Faith Network (IFN), was forced to close after the Conservative government withdrew its funding - because one of its trustees was an MCB member. Non-Muslims in Liverpool are protecting their local mosque from potential attacks as far-right rallies are expected to take place across the UK this weekend. pic.twitter.com/D5tO5C8GR4 — Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) August 3, 2024 The Labour government under Starmer then adopted the same approach. MEE revealed in July 2024 that the government had not been responding to communications from the MCB throughout the far-right riots which swept the country that summer. MEE also revealed last July that the government blocked a working group it set up to advise on a possible definition of Islamophobia from consulting the MCB. The alleged "non-engagement policy" itself has proved impossible to pin down. The MCB continues to have significant reach among Muslim civil society organisations and its leadership remains democratically elected. Whether Prime Minister Burnham - who spoke at an MCB dinner years six years after the claimed non-engagement policy began - will change course and engage with the organisation remains to be seen. UK Politics News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

21 minutes ago

military · geopolitical

⚔️

Exclusive: Does the UK's 'don't talk to the Muslim Council of Britain' policy actually exist?

S9

Exclusive: Does the UK's 'don't talk to the Muslim Council of Britain' policy actually exist? Submitted by Imran Mulla on Tue, 07/28/2026 - 13:36 Relevant government departments hold no information on MCB 'non-engagement policy' cited by Burnham government Britain's new Prime Minister Andy Burnham gives his first speech in front of 10 Downing Street in central London on 20 July after being asked by the king to form the next government (AFP) Off Andy Burnham's government has said it is sticking to a policy of refusing to engage with the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) that it has inherited from previous governments. But a Middle East Eye analysis can reveal that the "non-engagement" policy appears to be a phantom, as no written records of an actual policy appear to exist. No relevant government department has taken responsibility for it - documents seen by Middle East Eye reveal that these departments say they do not hold any information on the alleged policy. It is unclear which department is even officially responsible for the declared policy, or what the official justification for the boycott of the MCB is. Multiple sources close to the government said that the new Burnham government is keen to mend relations with British Muslims, many of whom turned away from Labour during Keir Starmer's premiership. The questions surrounding the origins of the no-contact policy with the MCB come after it was revealed last week that a mosque is attacked in the UK every five days. But the boycotted MCB is the largest umbrella body claiming to represent British Muslim organisations, with more than 500 affiliates. The Telegraph reported on Monday that the Burnham government's new equalities minister, Sir Stephen Timms, spoke on a panel alongside an MCB representative last December. The Telegraph quoted a government spokesperson saying: "There has been no change to our non-engagement policy regarding the Muslim Council of Britain, and there are no plans for ministers to meet with the group.” But what exactly is the basis of this policy? Does anyone in government know? In search of the 'non-engagement policy' A recent response by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to a Freedom of Information Act request asking for any policy documents, guidance, finalised briefing notes or submissions to ministers "that set out or refer to a policy of non-engagement with the Muslim Council of Britain" offers no clues. The response, dated 16 June and seen by MEE, says "the information you requested is not held by the Department". How Andy Burnham can win back the Muslim voters Labour has lost Read More » A Cabinet Office response on 27 May to the same request, also seen by MEE, says "that following a search of our paper and electronic records, we have established that the information you requested is not held by the Cabinet Office". And a Home Office response on 22 June says: "We can confirm that no information is held that meets the criteria of your request." MEE has emailed the UK Office for Equality and Opportunity, which is part of the communities ministry, as well as the ministry itself, asking what exactly the non-engagement policy is and what the official justication is for not engaging with the MCB. A spokesperson for the MCB said: “This so-called policy of non-engagement is a historic relic. It was built to appease those who trade in Islamophobia, and it survives only by recycling decades-old allegations that have never withstood scrutiny." Prime Minister Burnham himself has previously engaged with the MCB, including giving a speech at an MCB Muslim Leadership Dinner in 2015. A search for the rumoured policy's origin So what is the exact origin of this elusive, rumoured policy of non-engagement? It is often reported that the policy has been in place since 2009. But this is untrue. That year the MCB was indeed briefly boycotted by Gordon Brown’s Labour government after its then deputy secretary general, Daud Abdullah, signed the so-called Istanbul Declaration in Turkey. According to the government, the declaration called for attacks on Royal Navy vessels if they tried to stop weapons for Hamas entering Gaza. Abdullah said : "I did not and do not condone calls for attacks on British troops.” Exclusive: UK told Karim Khan it would not back him as ICC prosecutor before removal vote Read More » The MCB denounced the statement, which it said was signed by Daud in a strictly personal capacity. Daud resigned and the Labour government resumed engagement with the organisation. Ministers in the coalition government also held meetings with the MCB between 2010 and 2015. Civil servants continued to meet with the MCB until March 2020. That was when the organisation produced a dossier outlining what it said was evidence of Islamophobia against more than 300 individuals, including Conservative MPs, councillors, party members and special advisers inside 10 Downing Street. That same month, civil servants reportedly broke off relations with the organisation - for unknown reasons. Yet even after that the MCB worked with the Ministry of Defence (MoD) by serving as a referee for imams applying to become military chaplains. But this was not public knowledge. In late October 2023, the Telegraph revealed that the MCB was working with the MoD. As a result , in early November that year, government ministers ordered the MoD to cut all ties with the MCB. In 2024 a major interfaith charity, the Inter Faith Network (IFN), was forced to close after the Conservative government withdrew its funding - because one of its trustees was an MCB member. Non-Muslims in Liverpool are protecting their local mosque from potential attacks as far-right rallies are expected to take place across the UK this weekend. pic.twitter.com/D5tO5C8GR4 — Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) August 3, 2024 The Labour government under Starmer then adopted the same approach. MEE revealed in July 2024 that the government had not been responding to communications from the MCB throughout the far-right riots which swept the country that summer. MEE also revealed last July that the government blocked a working group it set up to advise on a possible definition of Islamophobia from consulting the MCB. The alleged "non-engagement policy" itself has proved impossible to pin down. The MCB continues to have significant reach among Muslim civil society organisations and its leadership remains democratically elected. Whether Prime Minister Burnham - who spoke at an MCB dinner years six years after the claimed non-engagement policy began - will change course and engage with the organisation remains to be seen. UK Politics News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

22 minutes ago

natural disaster · natural disaster

🌊

France, Spain make headway against wildfires but new heatwave looms

S7

Firefighters raced on Tuesday to subdue huge wildfires that have forced unprecedented evacuations of tens of thousands of people across France and Spain, as western Europe braced for another heatwave. The fires have torn through a region already battered by a blisteringly hot and dry summer. Crews were seeking to capitalise on more favourable weather before a new wave of higher temperatures settled in from Wednesday. In the Bordeaux region of France, firefighters contained ‌the forest blaze...

26 minutes ago

social demographic · sports

📌

Xabi Alonso plays down Welbeck and Henderson moves after Chelsea win

S6

‘There will be a lot of transfer links, a lot of rumours’ Chelsea hit back to beat Western Sydney Wanderers 6-4 Xabi Alonso refused to confirm Chelsea are interested in signing the veterans Danny Welbeck and Jordan Henderson after his first game in charge of the team, a 6-4 pre-season victory against Western Sydney Wanderers on Tuesday, but said he was looking to build a squad that had “proper balance”. Chelsea are understood to be in talks over a surprise move to sign the 35-year-old Welbeck from Brighton, with the club also reportedly interested in signing the 36-year-old Henderson from Brentford. The links to two Premier League stalwarts reflects a revised transfer strategy under Alonso, with Chelsea seeking to recruit more experienced players into their squad as opposed to be solely focused on signing young players, often tying them to lengthy contracts. Continue reading...

27 minutes ago

social demographic · culture

📌

British MP accuses French patrol boat of firing 'warning shots' near him in Channel

S6

A British opposition lawmaker on Tuesday accused a French naval patrol vessel of firing "warning shots" while he was being interviewed aboard a fishing boat in the English Channel, an allegation French authorities deny. France said the gunfire was part of a routine training exercise conducted under international safety rules.

31 minutes ago

social demographic · culture

📌

Portrait of a City review – master photographers capture the US cityscape in all its grime, grit and glory

S6

Dulwich Picture Gallery, London Era-defining photographs from the likes of Alfred Stieglitz, Saul Leiter and Dorothea Lange showcase the urban landscape, from midnight crime scenes to gloomy corridors This – only the second photography exhibition in Dulwich Picture Gallery’s history – is a quietly contemplative but gripping show that traces two intersecting developments: the construction of the modern urban environment and the language of photography. Focusing exclusively on works from era-defining photographers of the 20th century made in cities across the US, it’s a concise overview that begins with the pictorialist pioneers of New York, Alfred Stieglitz and Edward Steichen, and keeps moving through masterpieces, starting with early examples of social documentary photography – Dorothea Lange’s Migrant Mother and White Angel Breadline, and Lewis Hine’s emblematic portrait of the high-steel ironworker Victor “Frenchy” Gosselin working on the construction of the Empire State Building. Continue reading...

33 minutes ago
Page 1 of 2474Next →