Ты видишь риск, которого нет в портфеле.
А видишь ли ты мир, который живёт без тебя? 8 эр. 4900 лет. Одна планета.
Смотреть AGORA ?

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Saudi Arabia says it closed vital East-West Pipeline after attack

S9

Saudi Arabia says it closed vital East-West Pipeline after attack Submitted by MEE staff on Fri, 09/11/2026 - 20:50 The pipeline has allowed Saudi Arabia to keep exporting oil, and its closure could spike energy prices further A handout picture provided by energy giant Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia's oil company, shows one of its engineers at Yanbu refinery in Medina province, on 16 January 2011 (Joe Lynch/Saudi Aramco/AFP) Off Saudi Arabia has shut down its East-West Pipeline after it was attacked on Thursday, closing a key outlet for Middle Eastern oil that has helped keep energy prices in check amid the US-Israeli war on Iran. “An official source at the Ministry of Energy stated that the East–West Pipeline in Riyadh and Medina regions was subjected to multiple attacks on the morning of Thursday, September 10, 2026,” the official Saudi Press Agency said on Thursday. “The pipeline was shut down as a precautionary measure," the statement said, without adding when the pipeline would reopen. Social media posts on Thursday showed large plumes of black smoke, claiming the pipeline was attacked in multiple locations. The attack came as Yemen’s Houthis conducted a lightning offensive along the Red Sea, bringing their military all the way to the Bab el-Mandeb chokepoint. The sweeping gains put the Houthis in a position to control shipping. The Houthis previously used drones and missiles to fire on ships, but now can use standard artillery. No military solution to conflict in Yemen, Eritrean foreign minister says Read More » Saudi Arabia did not say who was responsible for the attacks on the East-West Pipeline. CNN reported earlier on Thursday that the pipeline had been hit by drones originating from Iraq. Iraqi Shia militias and Yemen’s Houthis are aligned with Iran. They have coordinated in the past, with the Houthis believed to be sending advisors to Iraq and Iraqi militias sending technicians to the Houthis. The East-West Pipeline was built by Saudi Arabia in the 1980s as a bypass to the Strait of Hormuz during the Iran-Iraq war. It runs from the kingdom’s oil fields on the Gulf coast to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. The pipeline allowed Saudi Arabia to export about a third of its pre-war oil volume, even as other Gulf producers, like Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain, have been prevented from exporting crude. The UAE has continued exports using ships with their trackers turned off and a small pipeline terminating outside the Strait of Hormuz. The closure of the East-West Pipeline underscores the vulnerability of any Strait of Hormuz bypass routes, with talks aimed at ending the war all but collapsed. The Financial Times reported that Gulf states are expected to meet with Iran next week to discuss how to resume shipping in the Strait of Hormuz in talks brokered by Oman. Oil prices have soared above $100 per barrel this week, responding to the Houthis' control of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. The group says it is imposing an embargo on Saudi Arabian oil shipments, and diplomats say it is eyeing a toll in the waterway akin to what Iran has tried to establish in the Strait of Hormuz. Inside Saudi Arabia News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Saudi East-West Pipeline Shut Down as Precaution After Attack

S9

Bloomberg's Veena Ali-Khan said that clashes between Houthi rebels and Saudi Arabia is an 'escalation' of regional tensions as fighting disrupts key areas for oil production. Ali-Kahn said that Saudi Arabia is caught between a rock and a hard place when it comes to responding to recent attacks, as leaders weigh the impact of military retaliation against gains in leverage for the Houthis. (Source: Bloomberg)

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Israel will not give Greece the source code for air-defence system: Report

S9

Israel will not give Greece the source code for air-defence system: Report Submitted by MEE staff on Fri, 09/11/2026 - 19:45 After statement from head of missile defence, Israel says it will create a 'Greek source-code' for the billion-dollar system This picture shows a battery of Israel's Iron Dome air defence system deployed near Jerusalem on 15 April 2024 (Menahem Kahana/AFP) Off Israel will not give Greece access to the source code for the command-and-control system of the $3.5bn layered air-defence system it is building for its Mediterranean partner, the head of Israel's Missile Defence Organisation said. Israel’s decision to withhold the code would compromise Greek autonomy over its own air defence system and could raise questions for other customers of Israeli technology, like Gulf states. Greece agreed in August to buy a $3.5bn air defence system from Israel. The agreement is Israel's largest arms export deal. A current US official told Middle East Eye that Israel plans to “scale up” exports of air-defence systems, with the UAE as its desired buyer. Air defence systems comprise many moving parts, including command-and-control systems, sensors, radar, interceptors, and launchers. The tiered air defence system that Israel has designed is intended to address a variety of threats, from drones to long- and short-range missiles. Accessing the command-and-control system would allow Greek engineers and technicians to upgrade and maintain the system without relying on Israeli know-how. When the director of the Israeli Missile Defence Organisation, Moshe Patel, was asked by Greek newspaper Kathimerini whether Greece would have access to the code, he said: "No. Because the 'source code' was not included in the licence to use the agreement. ” Israel-Greece air defence deal to be 'scaled up' with UAE as contender, sources say Read More » Following that statement, Israel’s defence ministry said it would work with Greece to develop a “Greek source code”, allowing Athens to access the command and control for the various air defence systems. “The Greek source code developed under the programme, together with any modifications and additions to it, will remain under exclusive Greek control and be tailored to Greek operational requirements,” the defence ministry said. But Israel’s reluctance, expressed by the Missile Defence Organisation, is likely to raise questions about the level of Israeli control over the system. In general, countries exporting sophisticated military hardware have kept a technological edge over their systems. For example, the US is widely believed to have a so-called “kill switch” over its fifth-generation F-35 warplane. While the Department of War denies this, the F-35 is grounded in sophisticated American software, data and programmes. Israel’s defence ministry said this is the first time in history it will “supply a complete defence array against a wide range of threats - from ballistic missiles and aerial threats to hostile unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)”. Arms Trade News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

No military solution to conflict in Yemen, Eritrean foreign minister says

S8

No military solution to conflict in Yemen, Eritrean foreign minister says There is no military solution to the conflict in Yemen, and foreign powers will not be able to “subdue” the Yemeni people, senior officials in Eritrea, the East African country whose waters border Yemen’s in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, told Middle East Eye. “There is no military option in Yemen, which must be given a chance to be peaceful,” Osman Saleh, the foreign minister of Eritrea, told MEE in an exclusive interview from Asmara, Eritrea’s capital. Saleh also told MEE that littoral states must decide how to manage the freedom of navigation in the Red Sea, but this was complicated by the fact that Yemen is not united under a cohesive government. “Yemen is non-existent. The official government has no control. There is no 'Yemen',” he told MEE. Read more: No military solution to conflict in Yemen, Eritrean foreign minister says Eritrean Minister of Foreign Affairs Osman Saleh after the end of the 36th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union at the African Union headquarters in Addis Ababa, on 18 February 2023 (Amanuel Sileshi/AFP)

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Houthis used AI platform Claude to develop ballistic missiles

S9

Houthis used AI platform Claude to develop ballistic missiles Submitted by Sean Mathews on Fri, 09/11/2026 - 17:20 Anthropic said its programme was used by a group in northern Yemen to build guidance, control and navigation systems Fighters loyal to the Houthi authorities march during a rally to recruit more fighters, in Sanaa, Yemen, on 10 September 2026 (Mohammed Huwais/AFP) Off A group in Yemen attempted to use Anthropic's Claude AI to build guidance, control and navigation systems for ballistic missiles, the US company has said. In a report published on Thursday on how it had prevented illegal uses of Claude in several countries, Anthropic said it had "identified a cell of threat actors based in northern Yemen running three weapons development programs". Northern Yemen is the seat of the Houthis, who control Yemen's capital, Sanaa. This week, the Houthis launched a lightning offensive that has routed forces loyal to Saudi Arabia and Yemen's internationally recognised government based in the port city of Aden. As a result of their offensive, the Houthis now control a wide swath of the Arabian Gulf's Red Sea coast, including strategic islands and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a global shipping chokepoint that borders Eritrea, Djibouti and Yemen. The development programme included "a guided rocket that used a commodity phone-class flight computer with final-phase homing guidance; a multi-stage ballistic missile with a stated range goal above 2,000 kilometres; and a multi-variant missile... that included a hypersonic glide vehicle variant". The group used Claude to develop software for the weapons that would have otherwise required a team of engineers. Houthis eye 'full control' of Bab el-Mandeb, as Saudi-backed forces reel from offensive Read More » "We do not have evidence the actors succeeded in fielding an operational device; but they did test-fire a guided rocket," Anthropic said. "This field test appears to have failed: within hours, the actors returned to Claude to work out why it failed. " Anthropic said it had banned the relevant accounts as soon as it had detected the illegal activity. The Houthis have received arms and training from Iran. They have also received military assistance from Russia, Middle East Eye revealed in a previous report. But the Houthis also prize their independence and have a domestic industry focused on bolstering their military and intelligence capabilities. When they began attacking ships in the Red Sea in what they said was in solidarity with besieged Palestinians in Gaza, following Israel's invasion of the enclave in 2023, the Houthis turned to commercial shipping data to target vessels affiliated with Israel and the US, MEE reported. Yemen War News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

No military solution to conflict in Yemen, Eritrean foreign minister says

S9

No military solution to conflict in Yemen, Eritrean foreign minister says Submitted by Sean Mathews on Fri, 09/11/2026 - 11:29 Littoral states must decide how to best ensure safe passage in Bab el-Mandeb, but Yemeni divisions complicate discussions Eritrean Minister of Foreign Affairs Osman Saleh after the end of the 36th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union at the African Union headquarters in Addis Ababa, on 18 February 2023 (Amanuel Sileshi/AF)P Off There is no military solution to the conflict in Yemen, and foreign powers will not be able to “subdue” the Yemeni people, senior officials in Eritrea, the East African country whose waters border Yemen’s in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, told Middle East Eye. “There is no military option in Yemen, which must be given a chance to be peaceful,” Osman Saleh, the foreign minister of Eritrea, told MEE in an exclusive interview from Asmara, Eritrea’s capital. Saleh also told MEE that littoral states must decide how to manage the freedom of navigation in the Red Sea, but this was complicated by the fact that Yemen is not united under a cohesive government. “Yemen is non-existent. The official government has no control. There is no 'Yemen',” he told MEE. Eritrea sits in a strategic position, with 700 miles of Red Sea coastline. The territorial waters of Djibouti, Eritrea and Yemen comprise the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. At its narrowest point, the distance between Eritrea and Yemen across the Red Sea is approximately 20 nautical miles. “There are so many eyes on the Red Sea. It is a historic route of navigation and trade,” Saleh told MEE during a rare interview at the Eritrean foreign ministry in Asmara, the country’s capital. “Eritrea is in a very strategic position. We have a responsibility to safeguard the Red Sea to be a safe passage for all,” he said. A lightning Houthi offensive down the Red Sea coast has changed the balance of power in the region, with the Houthis now controlling the entirety of Yemen’s coastline across from Eritrea and Djibouti, along with strategic islands. 'A new idea' Diplomats in the region say the Houthi offensive serves two purposes. Houthis eye 'full control' of Bab el-Mandeb, as Saudi-backed forces reel from offensive Read More » Iran’s leverage against the US and Gulf states is bolstered by the group controlling the Bab el-Mandeb. The Houthis are also in a better position to push for a toll in the waterway with vessels in range of basic artillery. Before their offensive, the Houthis were demanding fees from Saudi Arabia, MEE was told. With the Houthis in control of the Arabian Gulf side of the waterway, Eritrea’s coastline is even more critical to global shipping. According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), countries can claim up to 12 nautical miles for their territorial waters. Under international law, vessels have a right to transit straits freely, but some legal experts say states whose waters comprise them may have a right to charge piloting, service or environmental fees. MEE asked Saleh how Eritrea views tolls in the waterway. He replied, “This is a new idea, a new concept. Because Iran raised it [in the Strait of Hormuz] doesn’t mean Eritrea will ask. ” “[But] there should be a discussion among littoral states and a decision how to ensure free passage,” he said. “If Yemen is non-existent, we can’t speak with it now about these issues. ” Another senior Eritrean official, speaking to MEE on condition of anonymity, said Asmara understands the Red Sea is “inseparable” from the ongoing US-Israeli war on Iran. “The Bab el-Mandeb and Strait of Hormuz are together. ” The official added that no foreign power, inside or outside the Middle East, will be able to “subdue Yemen”. Yemen War Asmara News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Palestinian man dies from wounds sustained in Israeli attack on Gaza City

S9

Palestinian man dies from wounds sustained in Israeli attack on Gaza City A Palestinian man, Mohammad Shamali, died on Friday after being wounded in an Israeli attack on a group of Palestinians in Gaza City’s al-Daraj neighbourhood a day earlier, Wafa news agency reported. Israeli forces also injured another Palestinian after military vehicles opened fire east of the Maghazi refugee camp in central Gaza, the news agency said. Earlier on Friday, Israeli air strikes injured several Palestinians west of Beit Lahiya in northern Gaza. Israeli forces also fired smoke bombs in the al-Tawam area in northern Gaza, while artillery shelled areas north of the Bureij refugee camp in central Gaza.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Kosovo needed international law to survive. Now it's helping Israel bypass it in Gaza

S9

Kosovo needed international law to survive. Now it's helping Israel bypass it in Gaza Submitted by Elis Gjevori on Thu, 09/10/2026 - 11:22 Pristina's gamble on Trump and Israel carries serious moral and political risks US President Donald Trump meets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as people in Gaza mourn a loved one and a Kosovo flag flies over soldiers amid the ruins (Middle East Eye illustration/AFP) Off After Israel’s approval, Kosovo on Monday officially signed up to US President Donald Trump’s controversial so-called Board of Peace and the International Stabilisation Force (ISF) for Gaza. In a statement on X, the Board of Peace called the signing ceremony a “landmark” event that underscored “Kosovo's commitment to the ISF mission and its continued support for the strategic objectives in President Trump's 20-Point Peace Plan”. The Board of Peace went on to say that Kosovo had deployed soldiers to Israel in early spring, far earlier than publicly stated, and that they were “leading planning across logistics, civil affairs”, as well as operating in Gaza and clearing “unexploded ordnance”. The Kosovo mission, however, has proved controversial in the majority-Muslim country, where people have held pro- Palestine protests and shown clear sympathy for the plight of Palestinians amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza. In contrast, Kosovo’s political establishment, either out of fear or for ideological reasons, has acquiesced to demands from the Trump administration that align with Israeli interests. On 30 March, Kosovo’s left-leaning prime minister, Albin Kurti, said: “We are ready to participate and help the people of Gaza, because we ourselves have been and are beneficiaries of international forces since 1999. ” In 1999, international forces led by the US bombed Serbia for two and a half months in an attempt to halt its ethnic cleansing of Kosovo’s ethnic Albanian population. Kurti’s equivalence between the two might prove politically useful in convincing a domestic audience that firmly opposes the genocide in Gaza. However, it may also raise eyebrows. Major General Jasper Jeffers (L), commander of the ISF, and Lieutenant General Bashkim Jashari (R), commander of the Kosovo Security Force, sign the inclusion of Kosovo into the ISF on 7 September 2026 (Board of Peace/X) “The comparison is, in my view, fundamentally unconvincing,” said Brunilda Pali, an assistant professor of conflict dynamics and resolution in the Department of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam. “The international intervention in Kosovo followed a genocidal war in which the international community had identified a grave humanitarian catastrophe,” Pali told Middle East Eye. “Gaza presents a fundamentally different problem,” she said, adding that “as a main supporter of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the US is not at all credible as a peacekeeper. ” Aiding a controversial project Like Serbia before it, Israel faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over Gaza. In 2024, the ICJ, a court Kosovo has relied on to reinforce its own sovereignty, found that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem was unlawful under international law. The International Criminal Court has also issued arrest warrants for Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. 'Participation could expose both Kosovar soldiers and the Kosovo government to significant legal and reputational risks' - Brunilda Pali, assistant professor of conflict dynamics Unlike Serbia however, Israel has a veto over who enters Gaza and who participates in the International Stabilisation Force. “Participation could expose both Kosovar soldiers and the Kosovo government to significant legal and reputational risks, particularly if the international deployment were to facilitate forced displacement, consolidate Israeli control over Gaza, or otherwise contribute to internationally wrongful conduct,” said Pali. Nor do Albanian politicians in Kosovo appear particularly concerned that Israeli ministers have laid out detailed plans to ethnically cleanse Gaza of its indigenous population and replace them with Jewish-only settlements. While Albanians welcomed international forces in 1999 for the protection they would provide, the US- and Israeli-backed ISF has entered Gaza for a decidedly different purpose. Protesters hold placards during a pro-Palestinian rally in support of Gaza in Pristina, Kosovo's capital, on 21 October 2023 (Armend Nimani/AFP) “By participating in the ISF, Kosovo is effectively asking Palestinians to accept an international security architecture in which one of the principal parties responsible for the genocide in Gaza, which is the US, retains substantial influence over the security environment, while the Palestinian population has limited control over the institution determining its political future,” said Pali. Eight independent UN experts jointly described the Board of Peace as an “illegal and illegitimate manoeuvre by powerful states driven by nostalgia and avarice”. The board, they said, violated Palestinians’ right to self-determination and represented nothing short of a colonial administration. The Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq described the board and the ISF as a “blueprint for the indefinite alien occupation and de facto annexation of large parts of Gaza”. 'Hoping to preserve its own security' Shpend Kursani, a lecturer in international relations at the Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies at the University of Tartu, in Estonia, noted that Kosovo, Albania and Morocco were “carefully handpicked Muslim majority countries … with full Israeli approval”. In addition to maintaining good relations with Israel, these countries are there to “sugarcoat” the deployment “and tell Gazans that these are the … Muslim countries that have come to Gaza to help Gaza”, Kursani told MEE. “This is Trump's private initiative. The Board of Peace has no international standing whatsoever,” said Kursani. “It is viewed as Trump's private initiative, actually almost like a parallel initiative to the United Nations efforts and its main mission of peacekeeping. ” Kosovo has not yet gained admission to the UN, primarily because of Chinese and Russian opposition. In the age of a capricious Trump presidency, Kosovo finds itself with few choices. 'With few other natural allies in the region, both Kosovo and Albania are stuck between a rock and a hard place, and their political elites are choosing to follow perceived geopolitical interests' - Sidita Kushi, assistant professor of politics If Trump can threaten to invade Greenland or revisit the UK’s claim over the Falklands, some in Kosovo wonder what he could do to the small Balkan nation, precariously placed in the international pecking order. “Kosovo appears to be prioritising its alliance with the US, hoping to preserve its own security and sovereignty by following US foreign policy initiatives, like the Board of Peace,” said Sidita Kushi, an assistant professor of politics at Mount Holyoke College in the US. Kosovo hosts Camp Bondsteel, the largest military base in the Balkans, which houses around 1,000 US troops. The force is largely seen as the only bulwark against Serb revanchism. Trump has already threatened to upend the European security order by withdrawing troops from Germany over its reluctance to participate in the Israeli-US war on Iran. “But, of course, its dutiful allyship and gratefulness do not guarantee Kosovo long-term favourable standing with the US, as recent history has shown,” Kushi noted, referring to Greenland and the Falklands. “Yet with few other natural allies in the region, both Kosovo and Albania are stuck between a rock and a hard place, and their political elites are choosing to follow perceived geopolitical interests and the status quo over undeniable human rights considerations,” she added. Balkans News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

'You have two million targets in Gaza': Israeli soldier details killings of Palestinians

S9

'You have two million targets in Gaza': Israeli soldier details killings of Palestinians Submitted by Nadav Rapaport on Fri, 09/11/2026 - 14:03 Drone operator tells Haaretz that soldiers are encouraged to kill Palestinians without rules or accountability Israeli soldiers enter the Gaza Strip in a military vehicle on 5 November 2025 (Nir Elias/Reuters) Off An Israeli reservist has said that army officers treat Gaza’s entire population of two million Palestinians as targets, describing widespread killings and a collapse of rules of engagement during the genocide. The drone operator, who spoke to Haaretz on condition of anonymity in an article published on Thursday, described a range of alleged crimes against Palestinian civilians. He said he joined the army in 2008 and has killed at least 54 Palestinians up until October 2023, including unarmed civilians. During the genocide in Gaza, he served in a drone attack cell until leaving the army in July. “In the first days, there were no rules,” he said, describing an army with no clear rules of engagement when it came to Palestinians. The reservist also witnessed the Israeli army’s attack on clearly marked ambulances in the Tel al-Sultan neighbourhood of Rafah in March 2025, which killed 15 Palestinian aid and medical workers. 'Anyone could kill whoever they wanted, as much as they wanted, and they wouldn't be held accountable for it' - Israeli reservist The Israeli army initially denied wrongdoing. After a mass grave containing the victims was discovered, it promised an investigation. No Israeli soldier had been put on trial over the killings. “These were clearly identifiable as emergency vehicles, even when ground fire opened on them,” the reservist told Haaretz, describing the night of the attack. “Without any apparent reason, the ground troops stormed the convoy. They shot at the first vehicle. The medical staff exited, hid behind the ambulances and pleaded for their lives, and the soldiers shot them, one after another,” he said. “After this incident, I realised that anyone could kill whoever they wanted, as much as they wanted, and they wouldn’t be held accountable for it. " 'Two million targets in Gaza' Despite witnessing the Rafah killings, the reservist continued to serve in Gaza. After taking five days’ leave in Georgia this year, he returned to duty in late April. 'Cannibal capitalism': How the Gaza genocide portends a dark global future Read More » When he returned, he said: “Everyone was already talking about killing. “I asked to meet with the intelligence officer to upload targets to the computer,” he said. The officer told him: “You have two million targets in Gaza. ” The reservist said the officer meant Gaza’s entire population of two million people. Israeli forces have killed at least 73,658 Palestinians in Gaza since October 2023, according to Palestinian authorities, with more than 1,300 killed since a ceasefire was signed last October. 'They fire at anyone they see' The reservist also described how senior Israeli army commanders move the so-called "Yellow Line" at will. The Yellow Line is a demarcation established under the ceasefire to mark the limits of Israeli military deployments inside Gaza. “The division commander decided, on his own, to push them westwards, sometimes by hundreds of metres, creating a new border,” the reservist said, referring to the concrete barriers that marked the line. Palestinians in Gaza had no way of knowing where the new boundary began, he said, adding that army commanders had encouraged soldiers to kill anyone who approached the line. “They try to incriminate people without intelligence and without proof, retroactively, just to create a justification for an attack,” he said, describing pressure placed on him and his colleagues to open fire on Palestinians approaching the line. 'Just like they shout to a player, "Come on, score a goal", they shout to a soldier, "Kill him, attack him"' - Israeli reservist The reservist said the concept of “collateral damage” quickly disappeared from consideration. “They fire at anyone they see,” he said, describing what he compares to a football stadium atmosphere inside his attack cell. “Just like they shout to a player, ‘Come on, score a goal’, they shout to a soldier, ‘Kill him, attack him’. ” The reservist also told Haaretz that he witnessed Israeli forces monitoring criminal acts carried out by army-backed militias, without intervening. “They burn rows of houses, and we watch them from above. Arson, looting, shooting,” he said. Last month, Haaretz reported that the Israeli army is allowing mercenaries, criminal gangs and drug dealers to commit war crimes in Gaza, in conduct it describes as “reminiscent of the Sabra and Shatila massacre”, which occurred in the Lebanese refugee camps and neighbourhood in 1982. Israel's genocide in Gaza News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

UAE-directed campaign used Claude to target Muslim Brotherhood and Sudan

S9

UAE-directed campaign used Claude to target Muslim Brotherhood and Sudan Anthropic detected and disrupted a UAE-directed influence operation targeting the Muslim Brotherhood, the artificial intelligence (AI) company said in its September intelligence threat report. The company said that a “single actor” used Anthropic’s AI assistant, Claude, to conduct a “coordinated transatlantic and regional operation to dismantle the Muslim Brotherhood globally. ” The campaign built a network of approximately 300 “inauthentic influencer social media accounts” to try and shape discourse around the Muslim Brotherhood, the war in Sudan – where the UAE backs the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces – and the United Nations, which was trying to hold Abu Dhabi to account for its role in the war. The actor used Claude to create a “front NGO that coped a real Swiss organisation’s identity and published state-authored human rights reports under it,” Anthropic said. They also ghost wrote official testimonies with the “goal of having them delivered by two people at the 62nd session of the UN Human Rights Council”. “The content was engineered with specific restrictions ensuring that neither speech mentioned the UAE,” Anthropic said in its report. The operation used Claude to research and profile 18 members of the European parliament and prominent journalists. “They compiled counter-accountability dossiers on UN Special Rapporteurs who had criticized the conduct of the UAE in Sudan,” the AI company said of the Emirati-directed actor. Anthropic said that though the operation was built not to be traced, its investigation “linked it with high confidence to UAE government officials”. Senior Emirati officials were named as intended recipients of the work.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Israel threatens further strikes after demolishing parts of Hezbollah’s tunnel network under Ali al-Taher

S9

Israel threatens further strikes after demolishing parts of Hezbollah’s tunnel network under Ali al-Taher Israel said Friday it was prepared to launch further strikes on Hezbollah after demolishing what it described as a vast tunnel network beneath the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge in southern Lebanon. Defence Minister Israel Katz said Israel was ready to “continue striking Hezbollah and at additional locations”, claiming the operation had created a stronger security zone protecting communities in northern Israel and allowing Israeli forces to threaten Hezbollah deeper inside Lebanon. The Israeli army said the tunnel network, which it claimed had been built over two decades with Iranian assistance, extended for more than two kilometres and contained dozens of Iranian-made rockets, missiles, drones and other weapons, as well as a command centre and living quarters. Israel detonated the network late Thursday in a massive explosion that produced a large fireball and was recorded by the US Geological Survey as a tremor equivalent to a 4.1-magnitude earthquake. The blast came about a week after Israeli troops said they had seized the strategic ridge as part of efforts to consolidate a security zone in southern Lebanon. Army chief Eyal Zamir warned that any Hezbollah attack on northern Israeli communities or Israeli troops would receive an “immediate and forceful response”, while urging the Lebanese army to demonstrate its effectiveness in southern Lebanon. He warned that failure to do so could prevent progress on an agreement between Israel and Lebanon concerning the deployment of Lebanese forces. Ali al-Taher lies near the edge of Israel’s self-declared security zone and close to the strategic Beaufort Castle.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Israeli jets raid Mansouri and areas near Tyre, Lebanese media says

S8

Israeli jets raid Mansouri and areas near Tyre, Lebanese media says Israeli forces carried out several air raids on southern Lebanon, targeting Mansouri and areas near the coastal city of Tyre, Lebanon’s National News Agency (NNA) reported. The attacks on Mansouri targeted “infrastructure and residential neighbourhoods”, while another air raid south of Tyre also struck residential areas, according to the state news agency. NNA also reported that Israeli forces fired artillery near the southern Lebanese town of Meiss Ej Jabal. The reported attacks came as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israeli forces had destroyed what he described as a Hezbollah underground facility near Nabatieh, claiming the site contained weapons and military infrastructure.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Houthis used Anthropic AI to develop ballistic missile software, says report

S9

Houthis used Anthropic AI to develop ballistic missile software, says report A Yemen-based threat actor cell has tried to use Anthropic’s Claude AI model to create guidance, navigation, and control software for ballistic missiles, a US artificial intelligence company’s intelligence threat report said. The Financial Times said Anthropic didn’t name the group but described a cell operating from northern Yemen, most of which is controlled by the Houthi movement, that was running three weapons development programmes. The cell was trying to build a multi-stage ballistic missile, a multi-variant missile and a guided rocket using a phone-class flight computer, Anthropic said. Anthropic said its safeguards prevented “many of their requests, but not all of them” as the actors tried to circumvent protections by hiding their goals and splitting their work across multiple sessions. The report comes as the Houthis have rapidly expanded their military presence along Yemen's Red Sea coast and moved toward the strategic Bab al-Mandeb Strait. We're publishing our most detailed threat intelligence report to date. It covers how people tried to misuse Claude—for cyberattacks, influence operations, surveillance, biology, and building weapons—and how we found and stopped them. We disrupted every operation in the report,… — Anthropic (@AnthropicAI) September 10, 2026

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Controversial Polish politician boasts of smashing UPA monument with hammer – video

S8

Grzegorz Braun, leader of the Confederation of the Polish Crown party, has damaged a monument to the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) in the village of Białystok in Poland. ] [The UPA was a nationalist paramilitary organisation that fought for Ukrainian independence during and after World War II, primarily against Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union – ed.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Pakistan says no plans for military action in Yemen after attacks on Saudi Arabia

S9

Pakistan says no plans for military action in Yemen after attacks on Saudi Arabia Submitted by MEE staff on Fri, 09/11/2026 - 10:17 Islamabad and Riyadh recently signed a trilateral pact with Turkey in Mecca, pledging mutual defence against military attack Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif meet in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, on 7 August (AFP) Off Pakistan said on Thursday that no military response by Islamabad was currently being discussed under its joint defence agreement with Saudi Arabia and Turkey following attacks by Yemen's Houthis on Saudi Arabia. Foreign ministry spokesperson Sajjad Haider Khan said Pakistan would act under the agreement if and when the circumstances required it. “There is no such thing under discussion right now," Khan told reporters at a weekly media briefing. The question followed Houthi attacks on Saudi cities and energy infrastructure this week. He added that Pakistan may act when the "time comes". The defence agreement, signed last month, states that an armed attack on any one of the three countries would be treated as an attack on all of them, Reuters reported. Pakistan has condemned the Houthi attacks and warned Iran to rein in its Yemeni allies, while Islamabad has also been mediating between the United States and Iran. Khan said there were no plans to expand the Mecca alliance as regional tensions continued to disrupt energy supplies, Reuters reported. Houthi advances Yemen's Houthi fighters have advanced rapidly along the Red Sea coast as the country's previously dormant war against Saudi-backed government forces resumed in the summer. The advances have put the Houthis in a prime position to control shipping in the Bab el-Mandeb choke point, while bolstering Iran’s leverage against the US, experts told Middle East Eye. “The Houthis have pulled off a military victory that puts them one step closer to be in full control of the Bab el-Mandeb,” Corey Ranslem, CEO of maritime security group Dryad Global, told MEE. pic. As fighting intensifies across Yemen, images released by the Houthis show what they say is the wreckage of a Saudi military reconnaissance drone shot down over Hajjah province in northwestern Yemen. twitter. com/4l70benmAF — Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) September 11, 2026 “I think it will actually be easier for the Houthis to exert control in Bab el-Mandeb than it is for Iran in the Strait of Hormuz because the US doesn’t have tangible military assets in the area,” he added. After days of heavy fighting along a narrow plain known as the Tihama, on Thursday the Houthis routed Yemeni forces loyal to Saudi Arabia and seized the historic and strategic Red Sea port city of Mocha. Arab media reported that the Houthis made further gains throughout the day. Additional reporting by Sean Matthews Yemen War News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Iran faces strategic dilemma as war of attrition drags on

S9

Iran faces strategic dilemma as war of attrition drags on Iran and the United States have entered another limited but dangerous phase of confrontation, with mounting military and economic pressure forcing Tehran to weigh escalation against the narrowing possibility of a negotiated settlement. The latest flare-up began with a US strike on Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces in southern Iran, according to Iranian accounts. Washington then said it believed Iranian forces were preparing to deploy rockets carrying mines in the Strait, one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints. Iran responded by attacking US bases in the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain. The military escalation comes as Iran has already spent weeks under a de facto US siege of its ports, placing additional pressure on an economy that was struggling even before the latest crisis. The Iranian rial has suffered a sharp depreciation, trading at around 2.2 million rials to the dollar, compared with roughly 1.8 million before the siege began. Yet despite the pressure, the government appears, at least so far, to have avoided the kind of widespread shortages that could trigger a domestic crisis. There has been no broad collapse in the supply of essential goods. But another vulnerability is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore: gasoline. Read more: Iran faces strategic dilemma as war of attrition drags on An F/A-18 Super Hornet is seen parked on the flight deck of aircraft carrier USS George Washington in the Arabian Sea on 4 September 2026 (AFP/US Navy)

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Nepal: Rescue efforts continue in the aftermath of a flash flooding disaster

S8

Two weeks after the devastating flash floods, the number of dead and missing continues to rise. At Kathmandu’s public hospital, as well as outside the military base in Bidur, hundreds of photographs of missing people have been put up. Hundreds of families come forward, hoping for news – good or bad – of one or more loved ones. A race against time is underway: helping survivors, finding those still alive and identifying the victims. Rescue teams have been carrying out repeated helicopter flights, as air access is now the only way to reach remote areas cut off from the rest of the world. Civil society has also mobilised, particularly Nepal’s Generation Z. From Kathmandu to Betrawati, FRANCE 24's reporters Alban Alvarez and Fantine Dantzer accompanied a humanitarian convoy along one of the country’s most treacherous roads.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Pakistan says no military action planned over Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia

S9

Pakistan says no military action planned over Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia Pakistan said on Thursday that no military response by Islamabad was currently being discussed under its joint defence agreement with Saudi Arabia and Turkey following Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia. Foreign ministry spokesperson Sajjad Haider Khan said Pakistan would act under the agreement if and when the circumstances required it. “There is no such thing under discussion right now... When time comes (we) will act under the agreement,” Khan told reporters at a weekly media briefing. The question followed Houthi attacks on Saudi cities and energy infrastructure this week. The defence agreement, signed last month, states that an armed attack on any one of the three countries would be treated as an attack on all of them, Reuters reported. Pakistan has condemned the Houthi attacks and warned Iran to rein in its Yemeni allies, while Islamabad has also been mediating between the United States and Iran. Khan said there were no plans to expand the Mecca alliance as regional tensions continued to disrupt energy supplies, Reuters reported. Wreckage of what Houthi authorities said was a Saudi Karayel drone shot down over Hajjah governorate, Yemen, 10 September 2026. (Ansarullah Media Centre/AFP)

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Surrounded by war, Turkey more than triples defence spending

S9

Turkey has unveiled plans to more than triple its defence spending over the next three years, driven by regional conflicts and a desire for a greater security footprint across Europe and the Middle East. Rather than ramping up its purchases from Western allies, Nato’s second-largest military power will direct most of its 229 per cent budget increase between 2027 and 2029 towards expanding domestic production. Announcing the plan on Sunday, Vice-President Cevdet Yilmaz said the aim was to ensure...

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Romania's secret CIA prison: Two decades of denial and unanswered questions

S9

Romania's secret CIA prison: Two decades of denial and unanswered questions Submitted by Andrei Popoviciu on Thu, 09/10/2026 - 18:45 As the long-delayed 9/11 case moves towards trial, evidence of torture at a CIA black site in Bucharest is putting Romania's role in the 'war on terror' under scrutiny The Romanian agency Orniss, pictured here on 8 December 2011, sits on a leafy street in northern Bucharest close to a set of train tracks. The agency has denied hosting a CIA prison (Stringer/AFP) Off Ammar al-Baluchi remembers the cold most of all. Held nearly naked in a cell lit around the clock by fluorescent bulbs, he referred to his detention "as if I was living in a refrigerator". The nephew of self-declared 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Baluchi was one of six to a dozen men believed to be held and tortured in a secret CIA prison in Bucharest between 2003 and 2005. The treatment of detainees at the facility, formally known as "Detention Site Black", is described in detail in Guantanamo court filings. Solitary confinement under lights that never switched off, sleep deprivation that at times meant being forced to stand shackled for days, repeated dousing with icy water, and forced shaving and physical handling that interrogators euphemistically logged as "attention grasps" and "facial holds" were common practice. A photo released by Baluchi's lawyers to the press in 2024 shows him stripped naked and photographed. It is believed to be the first published image - of tens of thousands - of a "war on terror" detainee in a CIA black site. "We know they were tortured horrifically," Ben Keith, a British barrister representing Baluchi outside the US, told Middle East Eye. "It's not always possible to say which bit of torture took place because they were tortured for days and weeks, but you don’t detain somebody in a black site with the purpose of just talking to them. " I was 18 when they sent me to Guantanamo. The system that allowed it never went away Read More » A quarter-century after the 9/11 attacks, which triggered the so-called "war on terror" and devastating US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq that directly killed at least 940,000 people, a US military judge has finally set a trial date for Baluchi: 5 June 2028. Lieutenant Colonel Michael Schrama ruled this month that the case against Mohammed, Baluchi, Walid bin Attash and Mustafa al-Hawsawi will begin on that date. Schrama is the fifth military judge to preside over a case that has been trapped for more than a decade in disputes over evidence, national security secrecy and, above all, whether confessions obtained under torture before the men ever reached Guantanamo can be used at trial. That question runs directly through a basement in Bucharest, where the accused are believed to have been detained and tortured. In April 2025, a Guantanamo military judge ruled that statements Baluchi gave the FBI in 2007 were involuntary and inadmissible, tainted by what the court called torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment inflicted on him in CIA custody, including in Romania. The judge found that Guantanamo's "modestly changed confinement circumstances" had not been enough to remove the “lingering taint” of what happened before he arrived there. A gesture of courtesy The Romanian site was part of a network of secret prisons the CIA ran across three continents in the years after 9/11 - in Thailand, Poland, Lithuania and Romania - as part of a rendition, detention and interrogation programme that was formally shut down in 2009. Romania's site opened in the autumn of 2003, according to court documents and NGO reports reviewed by MEE. According to a 2019 report by the Rendition Project, the CIA struck its agreement with Romanian authorities to host a black site in mid-October 2002. By January 2003, the CIA's Bucharest station was already discussing how to show Romania that "we deeply appreciate the cooperation and support". At the 9/11 museum, America remembers only its own Read More » That appreciation had a price: $8m, followed by "millions more", according to the same Rendition Project report. By autumn, the first batch of five prisoners had arrived. The late Romanian president Ion Iliescu confirmed the outlines of the arrangement in a 2015 interview with Der Spiegel, describing a request that came "around the turn of the year 2002, 2003" from "our US allies" who asked Romania "for a site". He said he approved it in principle as "a gesture of courtesy ahead of our accession to Nato", and that he deliberately did not ask for details. "We did not interfere with the activities of the USA on this site," he said. "This request seemed like a minor issue to me as the head of state. " The details, Iliescu said, were handled by Ioan Talpes, his national security adviser then. Talpes could not be reached for comment but gave a candid account to Der Spiegel in a 2014 interview, saying he discussed "a more intense cooperation" with the CIA from 2003 and understood that it involved detaining people at "one or two locations in Romania". He admitted to personally approving the leasing of a government building to the American intelligence agency. Talpes put it more bluntly in Romanian media, saying his country "did not have the interest to know what the Americans were doing" at the site it provided, to prove to Washington that Romania could be trusted. Crofton Black, a former investigator with the Rendition Project who spent close to a decade tracing the CIA’s rendition network through flight logs and declassified documents, told MEE that he thinks Romania "made the decision [to host the black site] because it was in their interest, and thought the US would cover for them". 'The highest state authorities were aware' Swiss Senator Dick Marty, whose 2007 report to the Council of Europe was one of the earliest and most detailed independent reconstructions of the CIA's black-site network, concluded that while "very few people" in the countries involved likely knew the centres existed, "the highest state authorities were aware of the CIA’s illegal activities on their territories". His report named Romania and Poland specifically as having hosted secret CIA detention facilities. The Council of Europe's list of Romanians who knew, according to Marty and later research by the Rendition Project, extends beyond Iliescu and Talpeş to a few other officials, including Traian Basescu, who succeeded Iliescu as president in 2004. MEE reached out to Basescu for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. The 2019 report adds a detail Marty did not fully spell out. After September 2004, Romanian officials were formally briefed by the US ambassador and the CIA's Bucharest station chief on the programme, in a presentation that "clearly described" the use of torture. "It's definitively the case - the allegations of torture, the money, the people who were held there - it's definitively the case that that’s Romania in the court files," said Black, who co-authored the Rendition Project report. 'We know from the ruling in al-Nashiri the Romanians knew about it; they might have not known exactly what was happening, but they facilitated the CIA to create a black site to torture these men' - Ben Keith, British barrister Unlike the black sites in Lithuania and Poland, which are believed to have been in more remote locations, Romania's site is believed to have been located in central Bucharest. An AP and ARD Panorama investigation in 2011 narrowed down the location of the site in Bucharest to the government building of the country's National Registry Office for Classified Information, also known as Orniss, on a quiet, leafy street in northern Bucharest close to a set of train tracks. Orniss "categorically denied" speculation that there had been a CIA prison on the premises, telling MEE that it rejected any association between the institution and "the so-called CIA detention centres". While the site's location is disputed, concurring testimonies in court records reveal details of the conditions inside it. The site consisted of six prefabricated cells painted white and tiled with impact-resistant glass, while the cells themselves were mounted on springs, engineered to keep detainees slightly off balance and disoriented. The site is sometimes referred to as "Bright Light" because of the fluorescent, continuous light inside. Another detainee held there was Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, accused of being the mastermind of the 12 October 2000 bombing of the USS Cole. He is believed to have been held in Romania between April 2004 and November 2005. His case reached the European Court of Human Rights, which later found in a landmark 2018 ruling that his detention in Romania involved an "extremely harsh" regime, including blindfolding, total isolation, exposure to loud noise and unbroken light, and leg shackles during every movement. The Court and related records also document sleep deprivation, painful stress positions, slapping and, at one point, forced rectal feeding. A 2014 US Senate Intelligence Committee report found that the CIA's "enhanced interrogation" programme in the black sites did not produce unique, life-saving intelligence that could not have been obtained by other means. A US Senate report on CIA torture revealed that the CIA held at least 119 detainees in its secret detention programme, with at least 39 of them subjected to the agency's "enhanced interrogation techniques," often without proper authorisation. The CIA also misled oversight bodies and the public about the programme’s brutality, while there was little accountability for the abuses. Continued denial For two decades, Romania's official position has been one of denial. The country's foreign intelligence service replied to an MEE inquiry that "the matters had already been thoroughly examined by the competent judicial authorities, both nationally and within international bodies" and that it could not comment further. Despite that, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2018 that Romania had violated Nashiri's rights, including by allowing his torture, both through what happened to him and through the state’s failure to properly investigate it. The Court found that a secret detention centre had operated in Romania and that Romanian authorities had "cooperated in the preparation and execution" of the CIA's rendition and detention programme, fully aware of its nature and purpose even if they were not privy to everything that happened inside. Romania responded by closing the domestic criminal investigation. A case opened in 2012 after a complaint from Nashiri's lawyers, represented by the Open Society Justice Initiative, had by 2014 been formally classified as an inquiry into unlawful deprivation of liberty and torture. Lawyers who represented Nashiri in Strasbourg and Romania did not agree to interview requests before publication. But according to a Romanian parliamentary question answered by the foreign ministry in 2018, the Open Society complaint originally filed sought far more than charges of torture and unlawful detention. It asked prosecutors to investigate complicity in murder, unlawful arrest, abuse of office, and failure to report a crime, among other allegations. Prosecutors narrowed that down in 2014 to two counts: unlawful deprivation of liberty and torture. 'There's been years of compelling evidence that Romania hosted a black site and the more it has grown, the government continued to deny it was involved' - Crofton Black, former investigator The investigation went nowhere. In any case, by 2016, the statute of limitations on the alleged crimes had already expired because no investigative steps had been taken that would have suspended the clock, and no suspect had ever been formally identified. Romania's public prosecutor's office told MEE in an official response that the file was closed in March 2021, with the perpetrator classified as "unknown" despite what it described as the use of international cooperation mechanisms to gather evidence. The same year, the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers expressed "profound regret" that Romania could not show it had used all possible means to establish the facts, three years after the Strasbourg ruling required it to. Keith, Baluchi's counsel, said senior Romanian officials acted with direct intent in 2003 and 2004 to allow the CIA to detain, torture and later transfer Baluchi to Lithuania. "We know from the ruling in al-Nashiri the Romanians knew about it; they might have not known exactly what was happening, but they facilitated the CIA to create a black site to torture these men," Keith said. "Our contention is that Romania not only facilitated the CIA black site but knew they were being used to torture individuals. " MEE reached out to Romania's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Justice for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. Romania's domestic intelligence service, SRI, also declined to comment, telling MEE that it lacked legal standing to address claims "circulating in the public space". With a trial date now set for June 2028, the confessions extracted under torture at CIA "black sites" – including the facility in Bucharest – have become central to the 9/11 case. So, too, has the role of the governments that allowed the CIA to operate these secret detention and interrogation sites on their territory. Romania, for its part, is still refusing to talk about what happened in its basement, despite the body of evidence that has emerged. "There's been years of compelling evidence that Romania hosted a black sit, and the more it has grown, the government continued to deny it was involved," said Black. "It's ridiculous, it's nonsense. " 9/11 Attacks Bucharest News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

The machines fighting men on Ukraine’s battlefront

S9

In a cramped workshop near the front ⁠in northeastern Ukraine, military mechanic “Chimera” is helping prepare his unit’s robot forces for battle. Lined up in a row, the four-wheeled unmanned vehicles known as “Hyenas” will crawl towards Russian lines with their payload of explosives and attack an enemy dugout or halt an advance. Similar models have captured Russian prisoners, said Chimera, 44, who asked to be identified by his call sign. “Imagine what 20kg (44 pounds) of explosives is like: it’s...

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Morning recap

S9

Morning recap Good morning Middle East Eye readers, If you're just joining us, here are key developments from across the region: • Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said its navy targeted a US unmanned surface vessel in the Strait of Hormuz. • US president Donald Trump said he did not regret going to war against Iran despite the impact the conflict may have on the November US midterm elections. • A Palestinian engineer, Hudaifa Hamdi Mamar, has been killed in Israeli shelling on residential areas in the Al Mawasi district, west of Khan Younis in Gaza. • The number of vessel transiting the Strait of Hormuz fell to seven on Thursday from 11 the previous day, well below the 10-day average of 15. • A 4.1-magnitude earthquake was registered in southern Lebanon, the United States Geological Survey said, after massive explosions were reported in southern Lebanon amid Israeli attacks. • Internal Security forces in Syria’s Lattaika province have arrested nine former military pilots accused of involvement in war crimes against Syrian people. • The US national average price of diesel on Thursday surpassed $6 a gallon for the first time ever, while Crude oil futures on Thursday hit their highest level since mid-May. • Gulf foreign ministers plan to meet their Iranian counterpart on Monday in a push by Oman and Iran to secure buy-in for a deal temporarily managing shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, Financial Times reported. • US vice president JD Vance directly sought “unvarnished assessments” of the Iran war from US military commanders in the Middle East, Europe and Asia, New York Times reported. • Israeli forces have abducted a young man during their incursion into the town of Al-Hamidiya in the suburbs of Quneitra, southwestern Syria. • The United States has imposed sanctions targeting Kataib Hezbollah, an Iran-aligned Iraqi paramilitary group, as part of an effort to disrupt financial networks supporting Iran’s regional activities. • Four unknown projectiles hit two vessels four nautical miles west of Oman's Khasab, setting one vessel on fire and leaving the status of the second unknown, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations said on Thursday.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Israeli forces abduct Syrian man during incursion into Al-Hamidiya town

S8

Israeli forces abduct Syrian man during incursion into Al-Hamidiya town Israeli forces have abducted a young man during their incursion into the town of Al-Hamidiya in the suburbs of Quneitra, southwestern Syria, the state television reported. Since 2024, when Israel moved troops into a UN-monitored buffer zone and seized Syrian territory there, Israeli military vehicles frequently push into villages in Quneitra and parts of western Daraa, conducting house raids and detaining local civilians. On 27 July, the Israeli army detained a civilian after raiding his home in the province.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Under siege: Iran faces strategic dilemma as war of attrition drags on

S9

Under siege: Iran faces strategic dilemma as war of attrition drags on Submitted by MEE correspondent on Tue, 09/08/2026 - 09:50 As US pressure mounts, Tehran weighs whether to escalate or pursue diplomacy An F/A-18 Super Hornet is seen parked on the flight deck of aircraft carrier USS George Washington in the Arabian Sea on 4 September 2026 (AFP/US Navy) Off Iran and the United States have entered another limited but dangerous phase of confrontation, with mounting military and economic pressure forcing Tehran to weigh escalation against the narrowing possibility of a negotiated settlement. The latest flare-up began with a US strike on Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces in southern Iran, according to Iranian accounts. Washington then said it believed Iranian forces were preparing to deploy rockets carrying mines in the Strait, one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints. Iran responded by attacking US bases in the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain. The military escalation comes as Iran has already spent weeks under a de facto US siege of its ports, placing additional pressure on an economy that was struggling even before the latest crisis. The Iranian rial has suffered a sharp depreciation, trading at around 2.2 million rials to the dollar, compared with roughly 1.8 million before the siege began. Yet despite the pressure, the government appears, at least so far, to have avoided the kind of widespread shortages that could trigger a domestic crisis. There has been no broad collapse in the supply of essential goods. But another vulnerability is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore: gasoline. Iran is facing growing difficulties in securing adequate gasoline supplies as domestic consumption rises and external sources become less reliable. The government has urged citizens to reduce consumption and is reportedly considering a significant increase in gasoline prices. The pressure is being compounded by developments in Russia. Moscow has traditionally been an important potential source of refined petroleum products for Iran, but damage to Russian refineries from Ukrainian attacks has constrained Russia’s ability to export gasoline. The UAE, like the US and Israel, is normalising a permanent state of war in the Middle East Read More » The combination of war, sanctions, disrupted trade and rising consumption has therefore created a difficult equation for Tehran. The government has so far managed to keep the economy functioning, but maintaining that stability could become progressively more expensive. That, in turn, has intensified an internal debate over how Iran should respond to the confrontation. Among some conservatives, the argument is increasingly that the current situation cannot be resolved by absorbing pressure indefinitely. Instead, they said, Iran should use the US attacks as justification for imposing much greater costs on Washington and its regional partners. A conservative political activist, who spoke to Middle East Eye on condition of anonymity, said that Iran now has an opportunity to respond disproportionately. “To break the deadlock, Iran is in a good position since the US attack has given Iran a right to answer disproportionately,” he said. “By raising the costs, such as an attack on US allies’ oil and water infrastructure, we can break the siege. ” The activist said that countries cooperating with Washington in enforcing the pressure on Iran should also face consequences. In his view, the economic siege is not simply an American operation but one implemented with the assistance of regional states, including the UAE. The argument reflects a broader view within parts of Iran’s conservative establishment: that deterrence requires demonstrating that any attempt to weaken Iran will impose costs on those carrying it out. Offensive doctrine An international relations professor close to the conservative camp went further, arguing that Iran should adopt what he described as an “offensive preemptive doctrine”. “In my view, our experience has shown that power can deter power,” he told MEE. “We carried out a preemptive operation in Jordan, inflicted casualties, and the Americans did not continue. “We therefore have no choice but to adopt an offensive preemptive doctrine, both militarily and through intelligence capabilities, to prevent future shocks and interventions like the 12-day and 40-day wars. ” The professor said Iran’s strategic calculations have changed as a result of the recent conflicts. He said Tehran had learned from its military and diplomatic experiences and that Iranian diplomacy had become more sophisticated. Qatar and Pakistan carry Trump’s message to Iran: He won't return to the MoU Read More » In this vein, he proposed a response that goes beyond conventional deterrence. The professor suggested that Iran should consider major strategic steps, including conducting a nuclear test, arguing that a nuclear capability could provide Tehran with a stronger deterrent against future American or Israeli intervention. The professor also described economic warfare as an extension of military warfare, saying that Iran must impose meaningful economic costs on the United States. Such arguments highlight one of the central dilemmas now facing Tehran. If Iran responds too cautiously, conservatives fear that Washington and its allies may conclude that military and economic pressure can be imposed without significant consequences. But if Tehran escalates too aggressively, it risks turning a limited confrontation into a broader regional war and further damaging an already fragile economy. A conservative source close to Iran’s power centres described the current situation as a possible period of “war between wars” in which both sides are studying previous confrontations and preparing for the next one. The United States, the source said, appears to be pursuing several objectives simultaneously: increasing economic pressure, weakening Iran’s regional leverage, conducting periodic strikes, changing the strategic balance and rebuilding its military and intelligence capabilities. “The key question is who benefits from time,” the source said. From this perspective, Washington’s objective is not necessarily to achieve a decisive military victory in a single campaign. Instead, it is to maintain the initiative, keep Iran under strategic uncertainty, and prevent Tehran from rebuilding its military capabilities or escalating on its own terms. But the source acknowledged that the confrontation has no simple solution. Neither negotiations nor military action alone, he said, can resolve the underlying dispute. Iran instead needs a new regional strategy adapted to what he described as a fundamentally changed Middle East. A narrow window for diplomacy Inside Iran, reformists and figures closer to the government argue that the latest confrontation should not be used as a justification for further escalation but as an opportunity to return to negotiations. A reformist analyst who writes for Iranian media described the conflict as having entered a cycle of mutual attrition, with the Strait of Hormuz increasingly becoming an instrument of economic pressure. 'We have no choice but to adopt an offensive preemptive doctrine to prevent future shocks' - Iranian professor of international relations He added that Iran can use its geographic position around the waterway to impose costs on its adversaries, while Washington is seeking to neutralise that leverage through military pressure. But the strategy carries significant risks for both sides. The analyst told MEE: "Any prolonged disruption in the Strait could push energy prices higher, increase inflationary pressure and accelerate the economic damage already being inflicted on Iran. The greatest danger is miscalculation: a single incident in the Gulf could push both countries beyond the point where diplomacy remains capable of controlling events. " Neither side, he said, appears capable of securing a decisive victory. Without a political exit, both Washington and Tehran risk becoming trapped in a cycle of escalation without resolution. “If the current trajectory continues, the window for negotiations will soon close, giving way to a decisive confrontation,” the analyst said. The ultimate winner, he argued, will not necessarily be the side capable of delivering the most destructive military blow, but the side that can extract a strategic concession while there is still time to prevent the diplomatic window from closing. The erosion of war and its limits That uncertainty is also visible among reformists close to the government. Speaking to MEE, one such source described the latest strikes as evidence that the conflict is increasingly becoming a war of attrition. 'If the current trajectory continues, the window for negotiations will soon close, giving way to a decisive confrontation' - Iranian analyst A few nights ago, US drones, missiles and bombs once again struck cities in southern Iran, killing civilians and turning a wedding ceremony in Kuhestak into a funeral. Iranian forces, meanwhile, targeted US bases across the Middle East with missiles. The source said the central question in Iran is no longer simply who can win the next exchange, but how long the confrontation can continue and what political outcome could eventually end it. Washington, he said, is sending contradictory signals: simultaneously increasing pressure aimed at weakening Tehran while also suggesting that military pressure is intended to bring Iran back to the negotiating table. The government continues to emphasise the possibility of restoring an earlier understanding reached with Washington in June, and demanding that the US honor its commitments. At the same time, other voices within the ultra-conservative camp advocate prolonging the conflict and even launching preemptive operations. The result is an increasingly ambiguous conflict in which neither side appears to have unlimited capacity to sustain the current level of confrontation. “A dramatic event is therefore likely to change the course of the war,” the source said. “But by its very nature, such an event cannot be predicted; any forecast would be little more than a shot in the dark. ” For now, he suggested, Iran is living with that uncertainty. A conflict that war alone cannot resolve A university professor of geopolitics close to the reformist camp offered perhaps the clearest argument against further escalation. He described the latest Iran-US war as a conflict that ended without a decisive result and forced both sides to change tactics. Washington, he said, subsequently shifted toward economic pressure, a naval blockade and sporadic strikes, while Iran increasingly relied on its geographic advantage around the Strait of Hormuz. But that advantage comes with a price. 'The greatest danger is miscalculation: a single incident in the Gulf could push both countries beyond the point where diplomacy remains capable of controlling events' - reformist analyst “Keeping the Strait closed also hurts Iran’s economy and its main oil partner, China,” he said. For Tehran, the strategic objective is therefore not necessarily to keep Hormuz closed indefinitely. Rather, it is to demonstrate that American military superiority does not give Washington unlimited freedom of action. The professor believes the resulting conflict is too deeply entangled to be resolved militarily. “The only viable path is a return to the 14-point memorandum, or a modified version, with simultaneous, verifiable steps and credible external guarantees,” he said. A framework backed by the United Nations Security Council, he argued, could make it more costly for either side to unilaterally abandon the agreement, the professor suggested. Iran can respond to the siege by escalating, attempting to impose greater costs on the United States and its regional partners and adopting a more openly offensive doctrine. Or it can use the current pressure to pursue a negotiated settlement while it still has leverage. The problem is that both strategies carry substantial risks. According to the geopolitics professor, escalation could strengthen deterrence but deepen Iran’s economic isolation and increase the possibility of a wider war. Negotiations could ease economic pressure but expose the government to criticism from conservatives who believe previous diplomatic efforts failed to provide adequate security guarantees. For Iran, therefore, the central question is whether it can transform the pressure into political leverage before the economic and military costs become too high, and whether Washington is willing to offer Tehran an exit that Iranian leaders can accept without appearing to have capitulated. For now, neither side appears to have found that exit. War on Iran Tehran News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Iranian strikes damaged multiple aircraft at Jordan base, report says

S9

Iranian strikes damaged multiple aircraft at Jordan base, report says Iranian strikes damaged multiple American military aircraft this week on the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, a US official told Reuters. The US military, the highest-funded in the world, suffered material damage even before Iran's strikes on Tuesday. This includes the destruction of more than two dozen drones, Iran striking fighter jets, and aircraft being lost to accidents. According to a May report from the Congressional Research Service, 42 US military aircraft had already been lost or damaged in the conflict. Since the Iran war started in February, 18 US service members have been killed and over 800 injured. A US official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said Iran's attack hit one A-10 Thunderbolt II, known as the Warthog, leaving it with a missing wing, while roughly eight F-15s sustained light damage and were returned to service. Iran's strike on the US base in Jordan came after US forces said they destroyed five Iranian crude oil carriers. Report by Reuters

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

NYT: Vance sought ‘unvarnished’ views on Iran war directly from commanders

S9

NYT: Vance sought ‘unvarnished’ views on Iran war directly from commanders US vice president JD Vance directly sought “unvarnished assessments” of the Iran war from US military commanders in the Middle East, Europe and Asia, New York Times reported. The newspaper said that Vance, who opposed the war from the outset, sought direct intel from commander on “objectives, tactics, casualty estimates, what the Iranians would do in the Strait of Hormuz, how adaptable they had become and how much punishment their government could absorb”. Vance wanted the commanders’ “individual judgments, in their own words, before they were consolidated into a Pentagon view”, the report said. He also asked for a detailed accounting of what remained in the commanders’ stockpiles, and how the transfer of weapons to the Middle East would affect their ability to deter China, Russia and North Korea. On the stockpiles, the commanders “were blunt”, NYT reported, adding, “they were most worried about their depleted stocks of Patriot interceptors, the backbone of their air defences”. By late spring, one theater was down to fewer than 100 of them. The war had also exhausted the theater’s supplies of the Army Tactical Missile Systems, which can reach 190 miles, along with stores of the Precision Strike Missiles, which were meant to replace them. NYT said the report was based on interviews with more than a half-dozen current and former officials.

← PreviousPage 15 of 319Next →