Ты видишь риск, которого нет в портфеле.
А видишь ли ты мир, который живёт без тебя? 8 эр. 4900 лет. Одна планета.
Смотреть AGORA ?

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Settler filmed emptying water from well of Palestinian family

S8

Settler filmed emptying water from well of Palestinian family An Israeli settler has been filmed emptying water from the well of a Palestinian family in Huwara, South Hebron Hills in the occupied West Bank. A video posted on X by Yehuda Shaul, founder of Breaking the Silence, an Israeli veterans's organisation ‘aimed at raising awareness to the dire consequences of prolonged military occupation’ names the settler as Moshe Bialistoki from Dvash M’Sela (Honey from Stone) Farm. "I am emptying your water cistern now," Bialistoki says. BREAKING: Moshe Bialistoki from Dvash M’Sela (Honey from Stone) Farm emptying water of a Palestinian family in Huwara, South Hebron Hills. "I am emptying your water cistern now" pic. twitter. com/M7KX5EGLgI — Yehuda Shaul (@YehudaShaul) September 10, 2026

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Nine former pilot officers from Assad era arrested for ‘war crimes’

S8

Nine former pilot officers from Assad era arrested for ‘war crimes’ Internal Security forces in Syria’s Lattaika province have arrested nine former military pilots accused of involvement in war crimes against Syrian people, according to Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA). Internal Security Commander Brigadier General Abdulaziz al-Ahmad said the arrests followed “extensive surveillance, intelligence-gathering and investigations, as well as a series of carefully planned security operations across the province”, SANA reported. AFP reported that three of the arrested pilot officers are Generals Menhel Anwar Saleh, Sami Ibrahim Mahmoud and Ghayath Ali Rehyé. "Their crimes resulted in a large number of casualties... and caused extensive damage to towns and villages, in addition to displacing residents and destroying homes and civilian infrastructure," SANA added.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Saudi Arabia says it will take ‘all measures to deter Houthi attacks’

S9

Saudi Arabia says it will take ‘all measures to deter Houthi attacks’ Saudi Arabia’s UN representative Abdulaziz al-Wasil said that Riyadh will take “all necessary measures to deter Houthi attacks and protect our security, sovereignty, and territorial integrity". The Saudi representative told a UN Security Council meeting that Saudi Arabia supports Yemeni-led political solutions that meet "the aspirations of the brotherly Yemeni people for security, stability and prosperity”. The diplomat called on the Security Council to send a message “that the targeting of the Kingdom must cease, military escalation within Yemen must stop and threats to international navigation must come to an end”.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Israeli strike in Gaza kills family of four, including children

S9

Israeli strike in Gaza kills family of four, including children An Israeli strike in Gaza on Thursday killed a family of four, including two children, Palestinian hospital and security sources said. "The bodies of four members of the Ahmad family were recovered in pieces after an Israeli strike hit a house in the Beit Lahia Project area in the northern Gaza Strip," an official at Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City said, identifying the children as aged 12 and eight. The Israeli military confirmed the attack.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Houthis eye 'full control' of Bab el-Mandeb, as Saudi-backed forces reel from offensive

S9

Houthis eye 'full control' of Bab el-Mandeb, as Saudi-backed forces reel from offensive Submitted by Sean Mathews on Thu, 09/10/2026 - 20:36 The Houthis’ interests converge with Iran’s strategic aims Houthi fighters gesture as they celebrate in front of the Security Directorate building in Hays, Yemen, in this screengrab taken from social media video released on 10 September 2026 (Social Media/via Reuters) Off Yemen's Houthi fighters' rapid advance along the Red Sea coast has put them in a prime position to control shipping in the Bab el-Mandeb choke point, while bolstering Iran’s leverage against the US, experts tell Middle East Eye. “The Houthis have pulled off a military victory that puts them one step closer to be in full control of the Bab el-Mandeb,” Corey Ranslem, CEO of maritime security group Dryad Global, told MEE. “I think it will actually be easier for the Houthis to exert control in Bab el-Mandeb than it is for Iran in the Strait of Hormuz because the US doesn’t have tangible military assets in the area,” he added. After days of heavy fighting along a narrow plain known as the Tihama, on Thursday the Houthis routed Yemeni forces loyal to Saudi Arabia and seized the historic and strategic Red Sea port city of Mocha. Arab media reported that the Houthis made further gains throughout the day. They deployed troops on the Hanish Islands, which sit in the middle of the Red Sea across from Eritrea. Meanwhile, Houthi forces continued to advance south to the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and the island of Perim. The Houthis' rapid advance has also raised questions about the coordination of Saudi-backed forces in Yemen. UAE-Saudi talks on Yemen Despite advancing down an open plain, the Houthis did not face significant air power from Saudi Arabia and its Yemeni allies. Saudi Arabia mulls military escalation in response to Houthi threats Read More » Mocha was held by the National Resistance Forces (NRF), a well-equipped anti-Houthi force led by Tarek Saleh, the nephew of former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, who was killed by the Houthis after allying with them a decade ago. Saleh’s force was traditionally backed by the UAE, but shifted its allegiance to Saudi Arabia earlier this year. The UAE and Saudi Arabia led a military coalition to oust the Houthis a decade ago, but have since fallen out over the war in Sudan, Israel and Yemeni separatists. The UAE announced its withdrawal from Yemen earlier this year, with Saudi Arabia assuming responsibility towards military groups aligned with Abu Dhabi. One western diplomat told MEE that the offensive came against the backdrop of talks between Saudi Arabia and the UAE about the latter potentially returning to Yemen to cover costs. MEE was told the talks were at an impasse. Houthi and Iran interests converge The Houthis' sweeping gains come after months of simmering tensions with Saudi Arabia. The Houthis launched strikes on Saudi energy infrastructure and shipping, while Saudi Arabia and its Yemeni allies launched air strikes on the Houthis. Yemeni forces backed by Saudi Arabia tried to make their own counter-offensive to seize the Houthi-controlled port city of Hodeida. The Houthis have two key motivations to launch the biggest offensive in the war since the ceasefire was sealed in 2022, Arab and western officials who have been following the flare-up in fighting told MEE. With their forces ensconced along the Bab el-Mandeb, the Houthis will have greater accuracy in enforcing their blockade against Saudi Arabia and policing international shipping. Yemen’s traditional arms trade has evolved into a modern, internet-driven marketplace Read More » Before the war, roughly 12 percent of seaborne oil trade passed through the Red Sea, but the waterway's importance swelled after Saudi Arabia turned to it to export oil as a result of Iran’s move to control shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Diplomats say the Houthis have been inspired by Iran’s efforts to impose a toll for shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. “The Houthis basically want a toll, too. Saudi Arabia has been adamant that it will not pay a Red Sea toll,” a diplomat in Riyadh told MEE. The Houthis endured months of devastating US air strikes from January to May 2025, but have been rebuilding their capacity. MEE reported in July that Lebanese, Iranian, Syrian, and Iraqi military experts specialised in drone and missile technologies were deployed to Yemen. Iran has also provided military supplies to the Houthis. The Houthis' advance on Bab el-Mandeb also bolsters Iran’s position as fighting escalates in the Strait of Hormuz, with both the US and the Islamic Republic targeting vessels. “This is totally consistent with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps agenda to control both choke points of maritime trade in the Arabian Gulf,” Ibrahim Jalal, a Yemeni researcher and policy adviser, told MEE, adding that it also serves Houthi interests, which have focused on obtaining economic concessions from Saudi Arabia. “The Houthis now control the highest mountains overlooking the Bab el-Mandeb. Targeting and surveillance will be easier. They can also strike targets in the Gulf of Aden with more ease,” he said. Yemen War News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Iranian arms and advice helped Yemen's Houthis seize key Red Sea city, sources say

S9

Iranian arms and advice helped Yemen's Houthis seize key Red Sea city, sources say The lightning Houthi advance down Yemen's Red Sea coast this week came with direct guidance from Iran's Revolutionary Guards seeking to open a new front in US-Israeli war on Iran, according to Yemeni government, Iranian and regional sources. Iran told the Houthis last week to escalate their attacks on Saudi Arabia, a close US ally, and promised more funding, weapons and senior officers to help them do so, two Iranian sources said. Several senior Revolutionary Guards commanders had already travelled to Yemen to oversee and command Houthi attacks directed against Saudi Arabia after weeks of discussions over military strategy, a regional diplomat briefed by Tehran said. A third Iranian source, an official, said Iran had held several meetings with allies including the Houthis and that the move on Mocha was a Houthi rather than Iranian decision. However, it had helped Iran by putting upward pressure on oil prices and hurting the United States and Saudi Arabia, the official added.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Sudan chemical weapons allegations highlight Israel’s involvement in war

S9

Sudan chemical weapons allegations highlight Israel’s involvement in war Over the weekend, the New York Times and Washington Post both reported on a “dossier of evidence” that detailed the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF). The dossier, “shared by a Middle Eastern intelligence agency”, included images, documents and intercepted messages between Sudanese military officers that described how the army “developed and produced chemical weapons over six months in 2024”. Multiple Sudanese and US sources have told Middle East Eye that the “Middle Eastern intelligence agency” is Israeli, and that the dossier it shared with the media was very similar to one Israel handed to the US government before it sanctioned Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, leader of the SAF, in January 2025. Read more: Sudan chemical weapons allegations highlight Israel’s involvement in war Armed defectors from the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) arrive in a vehicle as they are believed to be surrendering to the Sudanese military, in the west of Omdurman on 19 August 2026 (AFP)

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

NAZA review – Israeli intelligence officers cast chilling light on civilian deaths

S9

Venice film festival: Under the cover of night, anonymous personnel discuss AI, error rates and problematic intelligence units in a documentary produced by the Guardian Here is a disquieting documentary about what Israel’s military chiefs in Gaza reputedly call “Naza”, meaning civilian collateral damage – itself a queasy euphemism. The calculated “Naza” number is the amount of projected civilian deaths from each military strike, and perhaps it will come to have the same connotations as the US military term “body count” during Vietnam. The directors are Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, two of the film-makers behind No Other Land, which was about attacks by the Israel Defense Forces on Palestinian West Bank villages. NAZA is executive produced by Jonathan Glazer and James Wilson and appears under the production auspices of the Guardian, in which some of the stories have already appeared. There are flaws: interviews were conducted on the condition of anonymity, but if no-one can be persuaded to put their name and face to their words (and of course it is terribly dangerous) then the impact of this as testimony is lessened. But even so, the film is casting a chilling light on what is happening now in Gaza. Continue reading...

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Sudan chemical weapons allegations highlight Israel’s involvement in war

S9

Sudan chemical weapons allegations highlight Israel’s involvement in war Submitted by Oscar Rickett on Thu, 09/10/2026 - 14:28 Secret dossier detailing use of chlorine compiled by Israeli intelligence, sources tell MEE Armed defectors from the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) arrive in a vehicle as they are believed to be surrendering to the Sudanese military, in the west of Omdurman on 19 August 2026 (AFP) Off Over the weekend, the New York Times and Washington Post both reported on a “dossier of evidence” that detailed the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF). The dossier, “shared by a Middle Eastern intelligence agency”, included images, documents and intercepted messages between Sudanese military officers that described how the army “developed and produced chemical weapons over six months in 2024”. Multiple Sudanese and US sources have told Middle East Eye that the “Middle Eastern intelligence agency” is Israeli, and that the dossier it shared with the media was very similar to one Israel handed to the US government before it sanctioned Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, leader of the SAF, in January 2025. The dossier’s evidence seems to show that a secretive unit of the SAF, which has been at war with the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) since April 2023, produced chlorine bombs to use against its enemy. According to the NYT, much of the dossier - nearly 150 documents, bomb blueprints, images, videos, and voice notes, as well as several thousand text messages - appears to come from the phones of senior Sudanese officers. A former US official described the interception of vast numbers of messages as “an advertisement for Pegasus”, the spyware developed by Israeli cyber-intelligence firm NSO Group to infiltrate mobile phones. “The thing that is shocking is how much Mossad has been tracking this,” one Sudanese security analyst, who could not be named, told MEE. “I knew Mossad had interests in Sudan … but the level and depth and length of surveillance suggests that Israel is more involved in Sudan than we think. ” Middle East Eye has contacted the Israeli government and foreign office regarding the source of the dossier. Sudan’s army-backed government vehemently denies the chemical weapons allegations. Sudan's 'chlorine bomb project' The war in Sudan was prompted by a split between Sudan’s national army, the SAF, and the RSF, which was part of the military and had worked alongside the army. In October 2021, Burhan and RSF chief Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, commonly known as Hemedti, enacted a coup that removed the civilian element of Sudan’s post-revolution transitional government. 'I knew Mossad had interests in Sudan... but the level and depth and length of surveillance suggests that Israel is more involved in Sudan than we think' - Sudanese analyst But by 2023, the two men and the entities they led had fallen out. Both had different sources of power and wealth, with the RSF and Hemedti favoured and supported by the United Arab Emirates, Israel’s key regional ally. Plans to incorporate the RSF into the army acted as a trigger for war. By the middle of 2024, the paramilitary group controlled much of the capital Khartoum and the army was struggling. It is at this point, according to the dossier, that a SAF officer, described as “the head of the chlorine bomb project”, proposed the toxic chemical as a potential solution to the army’s problem. In an intercepted message, General Tariq Hussain explained that the “deadly gas could be weaponised to gain an edge in the battle for Khartoum”, according to the NYT report. From July 2024, a factory reportedly assembled prototypes of a chlorine bomb, with tests carried out in the Sudanese desert. Unlike sarin - used by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and Bashar al-Assad ’s Syria on civilians – or white phosphorous, used by Israel, chlorine is not a controlled substance, and in the dossier General Hussain reports on the import of 20 chlorine cylinders from Egypt, which has supported the SAF during the war. An 'incompetent operation' According to the Washington Post, the SAF relied on a crude assembly process that involved the use of household barbecue-style canisters and liquefied gas tanks. It was, one western intelligence source told MEE, “a modest, incompetent operation”. It was also, Sudanese army sources said, one that was kept secret from all but a few people involved because it was not a plan that had been agreed on. “The SAF lied to the world,” the former US official, who is familiar with conversations that took place between army officers, said. “But there was also a debate about whether the weapons should be produced and, despite the fact that it was agreed that they would not be, the plan was allowed to go ahead in secret. ” 'The SAF lied to the world. But there was also a debate about whether the weapons should be produced' - former US official On 13 September 2024, the RSF released a statement accusing the army of firing “toxic” missiles on al-Jaili, a crucial oil refinery north of Khartoum that was controlled at the time by the paramilitary. In the dossier, General Hussain is quoted as saying “they drank the gas” in a message describing RSF fighters ingesting chlorine gas after an attack. There were no confirmed deaths in the attack. There are no other confirmed occasions in which the SAF used chlorine bombs. The dossier does not contain medical evidence or testimony from any victims. In a statement shared with MEE, the Sudanese government clarified that Sudan was a state party to the Chemical Weapons Convention and “has remained committed to its provisions and procedures, including the non-production, non-stockpiling and non-use of chemical weapons”. It said that “all chlorine stocks in the country are designated exclusively for water purification, civilian industrial uses and energy, and it stands ready to demonstrate this before any competent international body”. The Sudanese government said it had taken “a number of measures in cooperation with the United States” after the allegations originally emerged, and that “the American side has not presented any evidence for these allegations. ” The Rapid Support Forces has been accused by the UN and US of committing genocide in Darfur, including in the cities of el-Geneina and el-Fasher, where eyewitnesses described to MEE the rape, execution, and extortion of civilians by RSF fighters. Israeli involvement in Sudan The source of the evidence for the use of chlorine in Sudan raises questions about Israel’s involvement in the war and appears to confirm what multiple sources have told MEE, which is that the Israelis now side with the RSF – whose main patron is the UAE – over the SAF. Israeli sources involved in their country’s decision-making in the Horn of Africa have previously told MEE that Israel sought to develop and maintain relationships with a variety of different players, rather than backing one side or another. 'The Israeli love story with Hemedti intensified in 2021' - North African analyst Talk of Sudan normalising its relations with Israel began in 2016 under the rule of Omar al-Bashir, the autocrat who came to power with the support of Sudan’s Islamist movement in 1989. Bashir’s rule was ended by the Sudanese uprising of 2018-19, but in 2020 Burhan met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Uganda at a meeting brokered by Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and his wife Janet. Shortly afterwards, Sudan signed the Abraham Accords to agree normalising relations with Israel, but the deal has never been finalised. “The Israeli love story with Hemedti intensified in 2021,” one North African analyst told MEE. The RSF chief was believed at the time and afterwards to have developed ties with Mossad. Exclusive: The Ethiopian army base covertly supporting Sudan’s RSF Read More » In the leadup to Sudan’s war, then-Israeli foreign minister Eli Cohen met Burhan as part of what the Israelis called a “historic diplomatic visit” intended to pave the way for the finalisation of the peace agreement. The war scuppered this. But Hemedti maintained his ties with Israel, whose key ally the UAE continued to support the Sudanese paramilitary – charges Abu Dhabi still denies, despite mounting evidence, including from the United Nations. “This feels like they are picking sides,” a former US official said of Israel, the dossier and the RSF. “The intelligence they shared with Washington succeeded in getting Burhan and the SAF sanctioned. ” “The Israel-UAE relationship has only grown deeper,” the source said. Last month, Africa Intelligence reported that two of Hemedti’s brothers, Abdul Rahim and Algoney, had travelled secretly to Tel Aviv in May 2025 and again in February this year to meet with Israeli intelligence and foreign ministry officials. After the recent signing of the Mecca Agreement defence pact between Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan - all of which support the Sudanese army - one analyst said Israel’s intervention in the information war over Sudan “seems like the Abraham Accords fighting back after the Mecca accord made it clear it was supporting the SAF. ” It was, they said, “the Abraham Accords showing its influence”. Sudan war News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Houthis seize key Yemeni Red Sea port, sources say, threatening global energy flows

S9

Iran-aligned Houthi militants seized control of Yemen's port city of Mocha on Thursday, military sources said, posing a further threat to global energy supplies. Four Yemeni government military sources said the Houthis had gained further leverage over the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the southern outlet of the Red Sea and one of the world's most important shipping routes, and were launching attacks on the strategic ​islands of Hanish.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Algeria suspends diplomatic relations with ‘dwarf state’ UAE

S9

Algeria suspends diplomatic relations with ‘dwarf state’ UAE Submitted by Elis Gjevori on Thu, 09/10/2026 - 13:17 Algiers cuts ties with Abu Dhabi and accuses the Gulf state of destabilising the wider region Composite MEE illustration of Algeria's President Abdelmadjid Tebboune (L) and a handout picture taken and provided by the UAE Royal Court on August 12, 2026. (AFP) Off Algeria announced on Thursday that it would sever all diplomatic relations with the United Arab Emirates after “exhausting all means to preserve bilateral relations”. In a statement, the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it had warned the UAE over its “hostile actions” and had expended significant effort in “drawing the attention of the Emirati side and warning it of the grave consequences that may result from its regrettable and unjustified behavior”. “Despite these numerous warnings, the United Arab Emirates has persisted in these actions, which have reached a point where they can no longer be considered acceptable or tolerable within the framework of relations between two sovereign states, or remain unanswered,” the statement added. The Algerian Foreign Ministry said it had informed the UAE ambassador of the decision and had given him 48 hours to comply. Tensions between the two countries have increased in recent years as the UAE has played an increasingly destabilising role across the Middle East. In a headline in 2023, the Algerian newspaper Le Soir d’Algerie called the UAE a “pyromaniac state” and condemned the state’s “harmful role” around Algeria’s borders. UAE threat to Algeria In recent years, the UAE has funded authoritarian governments and civil wars across the Sahel and North Africa. In Libya, the UAE has backed renegade military leader Khalifa Haftar in the east of the country, destabilising not only Libya but also Chad, Sudan and Niger. The UAE has also used Libya to fund the civil war in Sudan through its support for the Rapid Support Forces, which have been accused of committing genocide. In April 2024, Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune said in comments widely perceived as aimed at the UAE: “Wherever there is conflict, the money of this state [the Emirates] is there - in Mali, Libya, and Sudan”. Tebboune has also disparagingly called the UAE the “dwarf state” without naming it, saying: “I will not name it. They wanted to interfere in matters in which we prevented great powers from interfering. ” 'President Tebboune had spent the better part of a year railing against a 'small state' bent on stirring trouble; today he just stopped pretending it was anonymous' - Andreas Krieg, associate professor, King’s College London “This has been coming for a long time, and to my mind the significance is less the break itself than what it tells us about how Algeria now reads the UAE,” Andreas Krieg, associate professor of security studies at King’s College London, told Middle East Eye. “Algiers has effectively concluded that Abu Dhabi's regional playbook - cultivating what I call an 'axis of secessionists,' from Haftar in Libya to the RSF in Sudan to the southern movement in Yemen - was being turned toward Algeria itself,” said Krieg, reacting to the decision. Algeria has spent the best part of this year signalling its displeasure with the UAE. On 7 February 2026, Algeria began cancelling its bilateral air-services agreement with the UAE. While Algiers did not provide a formal explanation, most analysts understood that the decision reflected the UAE’s continuing interventions in Algeria’s backyard. “The sharpest fear is Emirati contact with the Kabylie autonomy movement, the MAK, which Algiers treats as a terrorist organisation and as a red line running straight through national unity,” said Krieg. When the UAE announced its withdrawal from OPEC earlier this year, Tebboune publicly dismissed the decision as a “non-event”. Tebboune said Saudi Arabia was OPEC’s main pillar and declared, regarding the UAE, that “the book is closed”. “The Foreign Ministry's wording is the tell,” said Krieg. “It says the decision came 'after exhausting all means' to save the relationship, and it pointedly names no single trigger. That's deliberate: this wasn't one incident but an accumulation - the suspected outreach to separatists, the UAE's military footprint in Libya and the Sahel, and Abu Dhabi's backing of Morocco on Western Sahara, which for Algeria is the most sensitive file of all,” he said. “President Tebboune had spent the better part of a year railing against a 'small state' bent on stirring trouble; today he just stopped pretending it was anonymous,” Krieg added. Inside Algeria News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Ethiopia's Tigray rebels accuse govt of new drone strike

S9

Rebel Tigrayan authorities accused Ethiopia of another drone strike in the country's northern region on Tuesday. The federal government has launched multiple drone strikes in Tigray in recent weeks and massed troops at the regional border, raising fears of a return to the civil war of 2020-2022 that killed some 600,000 people. FRANCE 24's Tom Canetti reports.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Yemen's Houthis close in on stranglehold over strategic Bab el-Mandeb Strait

S9

Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis seized control of ​the historic port city of Mocha on Thursday, four Yemeni government military sources said, gaining further leverage over the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, one of the world's most important shipping routes. There has been an escalation in fighting between Saudi Arabia's Yemeni allies in the internationally backed government and the Houthis in recent ⁠days, creating a second theatre of war in the Iran conflict that threatens global energy supplies.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Yemen’s Houthis seize port city Mocha, closing in on control of Bab el-Mandeb Strait

S8

Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis seized ⁠control of the historic port city of Mocha on Thursday, four Yemeni government military sources said, gaining further leverage over the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, one of the world’s most important shipping routes. The Houthis were launching attacks on the strategic Red Sea islands of Hanish, the government sources told Reuters. Government forces and their allies are relocating south to Dhubab, which sits directly on the strait, across from the island of...

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Iranian press review: Cheers erupt as US warships come under fire

S9

Iranian press review: Cheers erupt as US warships come under fire Submitted by MEE correspondent on Thu, 09/10/2026 - 10:01 Meanwhile, survivors of US attack slam medical shortcomings, a rights group warns about rising executions and former president Hassan Rouhani's referendum proposal sparks political backlash This US Navy handout photograph, released by US Naval Forces Central Command on 9 September 2026, shows a US Sailor standing on the flight deck of Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Mason on 4 September 2026 (AFP) Off Ultra-conservatives praise attacks on US warships A missile attack by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps targeting an American aircraft carrier and a destroyer on Saturday has triggered a wave of celebration among ultra-conservatives factions inside Iran. Despite official reports indicating that the attacks were repelled, confirmation of the strikes by US Central Command prompted a strong reaction in Tehran among supporters of continuing the war with the US, who viewed the escalation as a victory. The Hamshahri daily praised the attack, framing it as "only a warning" that would lead to missiles "striking" US vessels if the US military and economic pressures persist. "With the deepening of tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, the US naval fleet is more exposed to being hit by Iranian missiles than ever before; an issue that increases the risk of a devastating blow to the US military," Hamshahri wrote about the incident. The Qods daily also lauded the attacks under the headline: "Warships in the Crosshairs of Missiles. " Qods said this phase of escalating military tension between the two countries demonstrates that commercial vessels and oil and gas tankers will no longer be the only targets of Iranian forces. "Iran is showing that it does not view the US military warships enforcing the blockade as elements outside the battlefield. If this logic becomes established, the 'Tanker War' will not just be a war over tankers," the daily added. US wedding strike survivors raise concerns over lack of medical facilities The Etemad daily has reported on the fate of people who lost family members in the US missile strike at a wedding on 1 September, highlighting their request to address a lack of medical equipment and facilities in southern Iran. Ali Taheri, whose 43-year-old wife was killed in the strike, told Etemad that the local clinic lacked basic equipment needed to treat those wounded in the attack. ‘There was blood everywhere’: Survivors recount US strike on wedding in Iran Read More » "The clinic, which is supposed to serve 50,000 to 60,000 people, cannot provide proper services and does not have oxygen. If there had been oxygen there, my wife would not have died," he said. "My wife was killed and is gone, and she will not come back, even if her story is written about a thousand times. We must think about the condition and pain of those who are still alive. " Behrouz Mallahi, another resident of Kuhestak, also highlighted a lack of emergency responders during the attack. He said rescuers had to travel to Kuhestak from the neighbouring cities of Sirik and Minab, forcing local residents to transport the wounded to medical facilities themselves. Etemad also reported the lack of psychological support for those affected by the attack. Mallahi said his 12-year-old daughter, Ayesha, who was wounded in the US strike, was discharged from hospital after spending several days in intensive care but had not mentally recovered. According to her father, after returning home from hospital, Ayesha said she no longer wanted to go back to Kuhestak because she was afraid of being attacked again. Her younger brother also preferred to "remain in hospital" because he feared another attack. Dozens of people, including six women, executed in August At least 82 people were executed in Iran in August, including six women, according to Iran Human Rights, a Norway-based rights group. Three of those executed had been arrested during nationwide anti-establishment protests in 2022 and January 2026, the group said. Six women were among those executed, marking the highest monthly number of executions of women in 2026, according to the report. The UAE, like the US and Israel, is normalising a permanent state of war in the Middle East Read More » Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, director of Iran Human Rights, said executed women in Iran were victims of more than the death penalty itself. "Women who are executed in Iran are not only victims of the inhumane death penalty; many of them have been victims of structural discrimination, violence and a lack of legal protection for years before reaching the gallows," he said. In recent months, numerous political and human rights activists in Iran have condemned the rise in executions and warned that the authorities are using the execution of political protesters as a tool to consolidate their power while facing military attacks by the US and Israel. The latest report from Iran Human Rights suggests that those warnings have been borne out. According to the group's data, at least 528 people were executed in Iran during the first eight months of 2026. Of them, 29 were arrested during the January protests, while two were detained during the 2022 "women, life, freedom" protests. The report said 13 political prisoners were also executed in 2026 because of their alleged affiliation with banned political groups, while 14 others were hanged on espionage charges. The remaining executions were related to crimes including murder and drug offences, according to the report. Rouhani's call for strategy referendum triggers backlash Former President Hassan Rouhani has sparked political debate after calling for a public vote on whether Iran should continue its confrontation with the US. His remarks have drawn fierce backlash from conservatives. Speaking to a group of former provincial governors, Rouhani suggested holding a public vote to determine the country's strategic direction. "If we say to the people that our plan is to fight the world's big powers for another 20 years, and they accept it, then very good, let's continue. But if the people do not accept it and show us another way, do we not want to accept their opinion? " he was quoted as saying. His remarks angered ultra-conservative factions, who accused Rouhani of promoting surrender. On Tuesday, Hossein Shariatmadari, editor-in-chief of the Kayhan daily, criticised Rouhani's position and called for a judicial investigation into his comments. Similarly, conservative lawmaker Mahmoud Nabavian rejected the idea of holding a referendum on defence issues, accusing Rouhani of serving US interests. In a post on X, Nabavian wrote: "The cowardly opportunists who seek to create a false dichotomy of war and peace in the country are, in truth, aiming to surrender the great and powerful Iran to their [American] masters. " Iranian Press Review News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

‘Kahanist’ figure poised to enter Israeli parliament on Ben Gvir’s party list

S9

‘Kahanist’ figure poised to enter Israeli parliament on Ben Gvir’s party list Submitted by Nadav Rapaport on Thu, 09/10/2026 - 10:07 Tzachi Eliyahu, who wears a tattoo of the banned Kach movement, secures eighth place on Otzma Yehudit’s party list ahead of October elections Tzachi Eliyahu pointing to a tattoo of the banned Kach movement on his arm (Facebook/legenda. liat) Off An Israeli far-right “Kahanist” figure with links to a soldier convicted of killing an unarmed wounded Palestinian man is on track to enter the Israeli parliament, or the Knesset. Tzachi Eliyahu secured eighth place on National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit party list ahead of Israel’s upcoming elections, due to take place on 27 October, Haaretz reported on Tuesday. Eliyahu has a tattoo of the Kach movement on his arm. It was founded by radical Jewish supremacist Rabbi Meir Kahane, who was assassinated in New York in 1990. Kach was banned in Israel and designated a terrorist organisation over its racist policies towards Palestinians, including calls to expel them from their homeland. The movement was outlawed in 1994 after Baruch Goldstein, a Kach member, massacred 29 Palestinian Muslim worshippers at the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron. In 2023, Ben Gvir blocked Eliyahu from entering the Knesset following the resignation of Avi Maoz, chairman of the far-right Noam party. Ben Gvir, who has himself been convicted of supporting Kach, reportedly believed Eliyahu’s Kach tattoo would damage the party’s image, according to Haaretz. “He’s from the previous generation of Otzma Yehudit,” a political source told the Israeli news site Srugim at the time. “He’s that kind of Kahanist,” the source said. Ben-Gvir gives speech by memorial for ‘martyrs’ Baruch Goldstein and Meir Kahane Read More » Eliyahu has now secured eighth place on Otzma Yehudit’s list. Recent polls project the party will win eight to 10 Knesset seats. On Monday, after the party submitted its candidates list to the Central Elections Committee, Ben Gvir praised its composition, saying he was “proud that we have the most diverse list in Israel”. “Above all,” Ben Gvir said, Otzma Yehudit members “have a lot of love for the people of Israel in our hearts”. The minister has also made advancing the “voluntary emigration” of Palestinians from the occupied Gaza Strip and West Bank one of his party’s priorities. The term is widely used by Israeli officials as a euphemism for the forced displacement or expulsion of Palestinians. Links to a convicted soldier According to Haaretz, Eliyahu previously posed for a photograph with Elor Azaria, a former Israeli soldier convicted of manslaughter for shooting and killing an unarmed Palestinian man who was lying wounded on the ground in Hebron in 2016. In a social media post, Eliyahu described Azaria as “the child of us all”, saying the soldier understood that “you eliminate a terrorist at the scene”. Eliyahu has also been involved in several incidents of violence involving anti-government protesters in recent years, Haaretz reported. During the mass anti-government demonstrations in 2023 against the government’s proposed judicial overhaul, Eliyahu was seen attacking protesters on several occasions. He also called for Palestinian Haaretz journalist Hanin Majadli to be confronted at her home after she expressed support for an Israeli teacher who was dismissed for criticising the Israeli military. “Haaretz won’t fire her, but let’s make sure the police pay her a visit at home,” he said. In June, Eliyahu and other far-right activists raised Israeli flags at the entrance to Kafr Kanna, a Palestinian-majority town in northern Israel. “Our top mission as a government and as a people is to Judaise the Galilee and ensure the Jewish majority in the Land of Israel,” he wrote on Facebook. Israeli Elections News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Ali al-Taher: What Israel’s 'operational control' of the hill really means for Hezbollah and Lebanon

S9

Ali al-Taher: What Israel’s 'operational control' of the hill really means for Hezbollah and Lebanon Submitted by Adam Chamseddine on Wed, 09/09/2026 - 12:52 Hezbollah's withdrawal from the strategic ridge may ultimately prove less important than what will now happen around it Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli strikes that targeted the hilltops of the mountainous area of the strategic Ali al-Taher Ridge, in the Nabatieh district, Lebanon, on 14 August 2026 (AFP) Off For months, the south Lebanon hill of Ali al-Taher was treated by Hezbollah as an exception to a strategy it had otherwise adopted since the beginning of the war with Israel on 2 March: avoid fighting to hold fixed geographical positions at all costs. The shift reflected lessons drawn from the 2024 war, when Hezbollah's attempt to maintain front-line positions produced heavy casualties without preventing Israel from penetrating parts of southern Lebanon. An official familiar with the group's thinking said that the experience, including the prolonged fighting around towns such as Khiam, pushed Hezbollah towards a more flexible guerrilla strategy, in which fighters would avoid being tied to territory and instead preserve their ability to operate after Israeli advances. Even Bint Jbeil in April, long portrayed as the “mother of all battles”, was not regarded internally as a position that had to be held to the last fighter. Ali al-Taher was different. In June, shortly before the ceasefire took effect, a Hezbollah official told Middle East Eye that the hill would be defended “until the last man” rather than surrendered. He described the position as being of exceptional strategic importance, while stressing that “tactics and strategy change according to the circumstances” and that his comments reflected the conditions of the full-scale war then being fought. The distinction is key to understanding what happened next. Ali al-Taher is not simply another piece of high ground. The ridge overlooking Nabatieh and the Iqlim al-Tuffah area, roughly 15 kilometres from the Israeli border and rising to about 600 metres, commands important roads and approaches across southern Lebanon. The ridge is suspected of containing Hezbollah underground command and weapons facilities, while Israeli forces have said they found underground routes and military infrastructure beneath it. Potential shift in the threat’s direction According to the Hezbollah official, the strategic value of Ali al-Taher came from three interconnected factors: the underground facilities beneath the ridge, their links to other strategic underground positions, and the geographical advantage provided by the hill itself. Its loss last week, he argued, would allow Israel to reverse the direction of the military threat: rather than Hezbollah using the territory north of the Litani river to threaten northern Israel, Israeli forces would gain a position from which they could exert pressure and surveillance over the Nabatieh and Iqlim al-Tuffah areas. Israeli strikes kill 11 in southern Lebanese village, including two infants Read More » That calculation explains why Hezbollah continued to fight around the ridge after the June ceasefire, even as it had largely moved away from defending fixed positions elsewhere. Ali al-Taher remained the scene of daily Israeli strikes and Hezbollah drone attacks for weeks after the ceasefire, while the United States had proposed that Hezbollah hand the position over to the Lebanese army as part of a broader disarmament arrangement. The battle subsequently became a prolonged contest of attrition. Israel maintained aerial and operational surveillance over the ridge, repeatedly striking the area while gradually tightening pressure around the underground complex. In August, Israeli officials were publicly discussing expanded air and ground operations around Ali al-Taher, with Israeli reporting claiming that Hezbollah fighters remained inside tunnels beneath the ridge. A strategic defeat for Hezbollah? Yet, the Hezbollah official argues that the significance of the group’s withdrawal cannot be reduced to Israel’s claim that it now controls the hill. “The hill stood for nearly three months with total aerial and operational oversight from Israel, constantly bombarded, and yet our men stood their ground,” he said. 'The hill stood for nearly three months with total aerial and operational oversight from Israel, constantly bombarded, and yet our men stood their ground' - Hezbollah official The eventual decision to withdraw, he added, was a cost-benefit assessment, rather than an abandonment of the strategic importance of the position. This distinction has become particularly relevant since Israel announced on 3 September that it had established “operational control” over Ali al-Taher. The Israeli military said its forces had cleared Hezbollah fighters from two underground routes and established control both above and below ground. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz subsequently presented the move as the consolidation of Israel's security zone in southern Lebanon. However, “operational control” is not necessarily synonymous with uncontested or permanent occupation. Hezbollah has not officially commented on the claim, but members of the group denied it the following day, saying there was no Israeli military presence on the ridge and that its fighters remained deployed in the area and prepared to confront any attempt to advance. The dispute over terminology therefore matters. Israel has demonstrated the ability to operate on and beneath the ridge, while Hezbollah is seeking to deny that this automatically translates into a decisive strategic defeat. What next? The question now is what Israel does with that advantage. Israeli officials have said they intend to remain in their security zone until Hezbollah is disarmed, turning Ali al-Taher into more than a battlefield achievement: it is now part of Israel's negotiating leverage over Lebanon. For Hezbollah, meanwhile, the challenge is to absorb the loss of a strategically valuable position without allowing it to become a wider erosion of its military posture north of the Litani. The party's response is likely to depend less on attempting to immediately retake the hill than on whether Israel can use it as a platform to penetrate or dominate the surrounding strategic terrain. Israeli forces reportedly use phosphorus shells in attacks on southern Lebanon Read More » The Hezbollah official stressed that Ali al-Taher remains overlooked by other strategic hills that the party controls, arguing that Israel's ability to enter the ridge and reverse the threat towards areas north of the Litani is “another matter” for both Hezbollah and Iran. That points towards the central question of the next phase: does Ali al-Taher's loss remain a contained tactical setback, or does Israel turn control of the ridge into a broader military and political advantage? The answer will depend on whether Israel can consolidate its positions, neutralise the underground infrastructure and use the ridge to constrain Hezbollah's freedom of movement, while Hezbollah attempts to demonstrate that its withdrawal from one strategic position does not amount to the collapse of its wider military network. Recent reporting already suggests that the contest has not ended with Israel's announcement. Israeli strikes around Nabatieh have continued, while reports of Hezbollah attacks on Israeli forces in the area have persisted. In that sense, Ali al-Taher may ultimately prove less important for what happened on the hill than for what happens around it. Its “operational control” by Israel marks the end of a months-long battle over one of Hezbollah's most important fixed positions. But whether it marks a strategic defeat for Hezbollah, the beginning of a new Israeli push north of the Litani, or simply another stage in the transition from conventional front-line warfare to a more dispersed confrontation remains unresolved. The hill has changed hands in the military sense claimed by Israel; the larger contest over the terrain, the underground network and the future security architecture of southern Lebanon has not. Israel's war on Lebanon Nabatieh, Lebanon What Israel’s 'operational control' of strategic hill really means for Hezbollah and Lebanon News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Morning update

S9

Morning update Good morning Middle East Eye readers, If you're just joining us, here are key developments from across the region: • Iranian media reports explosions were heard on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz, city of Sirik and the area of Minab County. • Donald Trump has said the United States may hit Iran's Pickaxe Mountain, urging Tehran to be cautious. Trump said he expected Iran war to end immediately after the US midterm elections, adding that negotiations with Tehran remain possible. • Four Palestinians have been killed and several others wounded by Israeli gunfire north of Gaza, Al Jazeera reported. • Israeli artillery shelling has targeted Wadi al-Hujeir and Wadi al-Salouqi in southern Lebanon overnight and at dawn. • Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei accused US Secretary of State Marco Rubio of lying about claims the Yemeni Houthis were acting as proxies for Iran. • Hamas has announced the death of a top commander and member of its Military Council of the al-Qassam Brigades in the West Bank, Farah Hamed, in an Israeli strike on Gaza. • UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres urged restraint amid reports of further escalation in and around the Strait of Hormuz. • Top White House advisers, including vice president JD Vance and secretary of state Marco Rubio, have privately warned president Donald Trump that the conflict with Iran could extend through the remainder of his presidency, the Wall Street Journal reported. • Brent crude futures breached $100 a barrel on Wednesday to settle at their highest close since late May after Iran and the US struck tankers in the biggest wave of attacks on shipping since the war began. • Several American military aircraft suffered damage in Iranian strikes overnight on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, according to CBS reporter Jennifer Jacobs.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Netanyahu visits troops in occupied Syria as Damascus slams 'blatant violation' of sovereignty

S8

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a third visit to Israeli troops in an occupied stretch of Syria Wednesday, sparking fresh condemnation from Damascus. Netanyahu repeated his claim that the Iranian government is on the verge of collapse as the US-Israeli war against Iran drags on.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Majority of British adults approve of settlement ban, YouGov survey says

S9

Majority of British adults approve of settlement ban, YouGov survey says Submitted by MEE staff on Thu, 09/10/2026 - 05:21 Green and Labour voters back the sanctions most strongly, with even Conservative approval narrowly outweighing disapproval UK announced sanctions on Israeli settlements and a ban on all arms licences and other exports that "materially contribute to the occupation". (AFP) Off A majority of British adults approve of the UK government’s decision to ban the import of goods from Israeli settlements in the West Bank, according to a YouGov survey. The survey results released on Wednesday, and based on a poll conducted the same day among 4,506 UK adults, found that 52 percent of the adults approve of the ban, with 33 percent "completely” approving of the ban, while a further 19 percent "somewhat” approving it. Ten percent of the surveyed adults said they "completely disapprove" and seven percent "somewhat disapprove" of the ban that has been backed by 11 other countries. Thirty-one percent of the respondents said they did not know. A breakdown of the results by political affiliation shows 82 percent of Green Party supporters in favour of the ban: 59 percent “completely” and 23 percent “somewhat” approving, the highest of any political group in the country. Labour party supporters also approved of the ban overwhelmingly, with 47 percent completely approving and 22 percent somewhat approving, for a total approval of 69 percent. Only 17 percent of Conservative supporters completely approved and 21 percent somewhat approved, for 38 percent total approval, narrowly outweighing 34 percent total disapproval—12 percent somewhat disapproving and 22 percent completely. Twenty-seven percent voted ‘did not know’. At 46 percent, Reform supporters expressed the highest disapproval of all the groups surveyed, with 31 percent saying they did not know. Comprehensive sanctions On Tuesday, the British government recognised the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, declared the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory illegal and announced both comprehensive sanctions on Israeli settlements and a ban on all arms licences and other exports that "materially contribute to the occupation". Eleven other countries—Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden—signed a joint statement with Britain published on Tuesday, saying they "confirm their intention to introduce national and/or support European restrictions on trade in goods with settlements which are illegal under international law, or that they are actively considering these and other measures, in accordance with their national procedures". Israel reacted to the announcement by banning British MPs from entering the country. Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Israel would close the British consulate in occupied East Jerusalem and remove British representatives from the International Gaza Support Center. He further announced an end to British training of Palestinian forces and a ban on 11 British MPs from entering Israel. The list includes former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, independent MP Zarah Sultana, Labour MPs Naz Shah, Diane Abbott, John McDonnell and Richard Burgon, and Green Party MPs Carla Denyer, Adrian Ramsay, Ellie Chowns, Sian Berry and Hannah Spencer. In addition, Israel banned the lawyer Fahad Ansari, who has worked on a case arguing for Hamas to be de-proscribed as a terror organisation in Britain. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said on Tuesday afternoon: "I have visited all parts of Palestine on several occasions, where I have witnessed the horrors of occupation, as well as the resilience and humanity of the Palestinian people. "They are the ones who suffer from Israel's apartheid. It is their freedom which is egregiously curtailed, alongside thousands of Palestinian refugees who are denied the right of return. " Corbyn added that "it is shocking that Israel continues to deny entry to UN investigators and international journalists. Israel doesn't want the world to see what it is doing - but we can never give up in our attempts to expose the truth". Labour MP Naz Shah said the selection of MPs banned "appears rather random and, frankly, bizarre". She added: "I am proud to support the UK Government's actions today, taken in line with our international legal obligations. " 'We will not be bullied into silence' Labour MP Richard Burgon, a prominent campaigner in parliament for stronger action on Israel, said: "I’ve repeatedly called for sanctions on Israel over its war crimes and ethnic cleansing, including by providing evidence to the International Criminal Court. "The decision by the Israeli government to sanction me today will not intimidate me into silence. I will continue to do what is right, speak out in defence of international law and stand up for justice for the Palestinian people. " All of the Green Party's MPs were banned by Israel. The Green Party has consistently called for sanctions on Israel, accused it of committing genocide in Gaza and backed the proscription of the Israeli military as a terrorist organisation. A Green Party spokesperson said: "We will not be bullied into silence by the Israeli government. We are proud of our MPs for standing up for Palestinian rights and demanding an end to British complicity in genocide and illegal occupation. "These threats only strengthen our resolve. The British government must stand firm and follow these overdue restrictions with a full arms embargo and wide-ranging sanctions. " Zack Polanski, the leader of the Green Party, added: "Our Green MPs have consistently spoken out and voted on the right side of history. "Standing up against ethnic cleansing, occupation and genocide, as all MPs should be doing. " Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said in parliament on Tuesday afternoon that "the official view of the British government is that the occupation is unlawful because of Israel's entrenchment of its control, its intention to extend permanent sovereignty and its expansionist agenda via illegal settlements". This means the UK has accepted the 2024 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, which said the occupation is unlawful and placed a duty on states to oppose it. Miliband said: "The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank perpetrated by settler terrorists. "And all too often, the Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this, and worse, members of it have made statements and taken actions to support the forced displacement of Palestinians. " UK Politics News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

← PreviousPage 16 of 319Next →