Ты видишь риск, которого нет в портфеле.
А видишь ли ты мир, который живёт без тебя? 8 эр. 4900 лет. Одна планета.
Смотреть AGORA ?

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Iranian strikes on Jordan base damaged several US aircraft, CBS reporter says

S9

Iranian strikes on Jordan base damaged several US aircraft, CBS reporter says Several American military aircraft suffered damage in Iranian strikes overnight on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, CBS reporter Jennifer Jacobs wrote on X. “One A-10 Thunderbolt, known as the Warthog, was struck and left with a missing wing. Roughly eight F-15s sustained light damage and were placed back into service,” Jennifer said, citing sources that also informed Jim LaPorta, national security coordinating producer at CBS News. American forces in Jordan launched more than 30 Patriots missiles defending against the Iranian strikes, she said. News: Multiple American military aircraft suffered damage in strikes overnight on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, sources told @JimLaPorta and me. One A-10 Thunderbolt, known as the Warthog, was struck and left with a missing wing. Roughly eight F-15s sustained light damage… — Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) September 10, 2026

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Israeli helicopters open fire near Gaza camp, forces raid West Bank town

S8

Israeli helicopters open fire near Gaza camp, forces raid West Bank town Israeli military helicopters opened fire early Thursday in the vicinity of the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza, Palestinian news agency Wafa reports. Meanwhile, Israeli forces raided the town of Tuqu’, southeast of Bethlehem, shortly after midnight, Wafa reported. The forces set up a military checkpoint in the centre of the town, triggering confrontations with Palestinian youth. They chased the young men through the town’s neighbourhoods, fired sound grenades at them, and detained a 24-year-old resident, who was taken to an unknown destination. The forces also raided areas surrounding Palestinian residents’ homes before withdrawing from the town towards its western entrance after a raid that lasted about two hours, the report said.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Hamas member released in exchange for Israeli soldier killed in Gaza strike

S8

Hamas member released in exchange for Israeli soldier killed in Gaza strike Hamas has announced the death of a top commander and member of its Military Council of the al-Qassam Brigades in the West Bank, Farah Hamed, in an Israeli strike in Gaza on Wednesday. Hamed hailed from the town of Silwad, east of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank, and had been deported to the Gaza Strip after his release in 2011 as part of the prisoner exchange deal for kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. Palestinian media reports said Hamed was killed “due to the occupation's shelling in Al-Rashid Street in the Sheikh Ajlin area, southwest of Gaza City”.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Records reveal Cuny investments in weapons firms supplying Israel

S9

Records reveal Cuny investments in weapons firms supplying Israel Submitted by Azad Essa on Tue, 09/08/2026 - 20:40 City University of New York becomes one of a very small number of American universities to publicly disclose investments in defence companies operating with Israel Pro-Palestinian supporters hold signs during demonstrations at the City College of New York as the NYPD cracks down on protest camps at both Columbia University and CCNY, on 30 April 2024 in New York City (Spencer Platt/AFP) Off The City University of New York (Cuny) invested over $715,000 in weapons manufacturers supplying the Israeli military, financial records obtained by pro- Palestine campaigners have revealed. The records obtained by pro-Palestine groups at the largest public university in the US show that the institution's investment portfolio includes holdings in several weapons companies - including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Palantir, Elbit Systems, and General Dynamics - all of which have supplied weapons or military technology to the Israeli army. In doing so, Cuny becomes one of a very small number of American universities to publicly disclose investments in defence companies operating with Israel. The revelations prove that the university is complicit in the US-supported Israeli genocide in Gaza, Cuny4Palestine and Cuny Law Students for Justice in Palestine (Cuny Law SJP) said in a statement on Wednesday. More than 250,000 Palestinians have been killed or injured, and the Gaza Strip has been left in ruins, following Israel's war since the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel. "CUNY is therefore directly complicit in the ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people, the imperialist violence targeting West Asia and the Global South more broadly, and the fascist violence inflicted upon migrants by U. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and US Customs and Border Protection (CBP)," a Cuny faculty organiser said in a statement issued by the two groups on Wednesday. On Wednesday afternoon, campaigners are expected to hold a press conference outside City Hall to publicly discuss details of the disclosures. The encampments The disclosures come after years of organising and mobilisation at Cuny. Students and faculty at Cuny were among the earliest to launch an encampment in April 2024, following Columbia University's lead, to demand that the university "disclose and divest" from defence contractors said to be supplying military products and services to the Israeli army. Though ties and partnerships between academia and the defence sector have long operated as an open secret in the US, universities have typically kept details of their investments out of the public eye. Columbia University, Cuny most 'hostile' campuses for Muslims: Cair Read More » In 2024, as the genocide in the Gaza Strip unfolded, Cuny4Palestine and Cuny Law SJP filed a FOIL (Freedom of Information Law) request urging administrators to provide a transparent account of the university's investments in defence firms. When the university refused to provide the details in 2024, activists filed a lawsuit - Sarah Southey v. City University of New York - demanding that Cuny disclose the extent of its investments. As part of a settlement reached between the two parties in mid-August, the university was required to disclose its investment records dating back to July 2023. “While we’re grateful that the largest, urban public university in the country will finally disclose its investment records, it is outrageous that our client had to file this lawsuit in the first place,” Veronica Salama, senior staff attorney at the New York Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. Activists said that the figures displayed in Cuny's records were even higher than anticipated. According to campaigners, the university's 2025 holdings report showed that Cuny held $212,407.10 in unsecured Boeing stocks, $107,488.89 in Boeing common stock, and $65,302.74 in Lockheed Martin stock. Both companies have signed arms deals worth millions of dollars with Israel. Activists noted that Boeing is implicated in the ongoing wars in Iran and the bombings of Lebanon and the Gaza Strip through its manufacture of F-15 fighter jets, Apache AH-64 attack helicopters, and the notorious bunker-buster bombs. "Apache helicopters were also used in the illegal invasion of Venezuela and the hostage-taking of President Nicolas Maduro and First Combatant Cilia Flores on January 3, 2026," the statement said. The activists also noted that Cuny held stocks in Raytheon, valued at $141,201.34, as well as in Palantir, amounting to $189,348.48. Activists said that Palantir continues to provide technology to the Israeli military, while Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon manufacture aircraft, missiles and munitions used by Israeli forces. "This is just the tip of the iceberg! As we declared during CUNY's Gaza Solidarity Encampment: we will not stop, we will not rest until our tax and tuition dollars are divested from death and destruction and reinvested in life-sustaining institutions and practices! " We demand CUNY live up to its name as a 'People's University'! " Police look on during pro-Palestinian demonstrations at Cuny as the NYPD cracks down on protest camps at both Columbia University and CCNY on April 30 (Spencer Platt/AFP) While pro-Palestine encampments at Columbia University, Harvard University and Princeton University drew national and international attention, Cuny’s protest movement received far less coverage. But its importance to the city’s social and political fabric was no less - and perhaps even greater - given Cuny's place as the university of working-class students from across New York. The Encampments: A portrait of a protest for Palestine that moved America Read More » The disclosures, then, are likely to turn a spotlight on the crackdown on protesters at Cuny and potential political interference in subverting student and faculty demands for more transparency on what is ultimately a taxpayer-funded university. They are also likely to draw attention to Cuny's leadership, which rubber-stamped the investments and those who enforced its decisions. William C Thompson, Cuny’s current chair of the board executive committee and subcommittee on investment, has held the position since 2016. Thompson was reappointed to a six-year term in June 2023 by New York Governor Kathy Hochul, a staunch supporter of Israel. Activists said they would be using the information to step up efforts to secure divestment from the companies. Cuny did not immediately respond to Middle East Eye's request for comment. Academic Freedom News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Two Palestinians injured in Israeli military raid south of Nablus

S8

Two Palestinians injured in Israeli military raid south of Nablus Two Palestinians were injured after being assaulted by Israeli forces during a military raid of the town of Awarta, south of Nablus in the occupied West Bank, Wafa news reported on Wednesday. Wafa reported that Israeli armored vehicles raided the town and fired live ammunition, tear gas canisters, and stun grenades at residents. The Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS) said that two 24-year-old Palestinians, sustained bruises after being beaten by Israeli forces and were taken to a hospital for medical treatment.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Lebanese army says Israel violated June framework agreement 7,700 times

S9

Lebanese army says Israel violated June framework agreement 7,700 times The Lebanese army said Israel has violated the June framework agreement aimed at ending the war, disarming Hezbollah and a phased withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon approximately 7,700 times. In a statement posted to social media on Wednesday, the army said that Israeli attacks have increased in recent days, killing at least 12 people in southern Lebanon's Kfar Reman and completely destroying 85 percent of homes in the town of Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh. The statement said that the continued bombardment "threaten[s] existing understandings and arrangements, and hinder[s] the army's efforts to establish stability" in the region. في ظل التطورات الأخيرة، يهم قيادة الجيش أن توضح ما يلي: ​في موجة جديدة من الاعتداءات المدانة والواسعة على لبنان، صعّد الاحتلال الإسرائيلي على مدى الأيام الماضية استهداف المناطق السكنية والمؤسسات، مُوقعًا عددًا كبيرًا من الشهداء والجرحى، آخرهم اثنا عشر شهيدًا على الأقل، بينهم… — الجيش اللبناني (@LebarmyOfficial) September 9, 2026

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Israel names new envoy to Turkey amid tensions over Gaza and Syria

S9

Israel names new envoy to Turkey amid tensions over Gaza and Syria Submitted by Ragip Soylu on Wed, 09/09/2026 - 18:16 Joel Lion presented his credentials in Ankara as Israel’s embassy remains effectively closed over security concerns The flags of (L to R) Turkey, Israel, and the Israeli army armoured corps fly at the Yad La-Shiryon Tank Museum in Latrun, about 30 kilometres west of Jerusalem, on August 18, 2022. GIL COHEN-MAGEN / AFP) Off Israel has appointed a new head of mission to Turkey this week, despite its embassy in Ankara remaining effectively closed over security concerns, an Israeli official told Middle East Eye. The Israeli Foreign Ministry selected Joel Lion as chargé d’affaires. Lion served as Israel’s first resident ambassador to Moldova until April 2025 and as its non-resident ambassador to Armenia until August 2026. His appointment follows the retirement of Israeli Ambassador Irit Lillian earlier this year, which left the ambassador’s post in Turkey vacant. Lion was in Ankara on Wednesday to present his credentials to the Turkish Foreign Ministry. The Israeli official told MEE that the embassy’s status was purely a matter of security, rather than politics. The official maintained that the embassy was not formally closed, as its local staff continued to operate in Turkey. “Both sides agree that the embassy should stay closed over the security issues,” the official said. Lion’s trip marked the first visit by a senior Israeli official since Israel withdrew its staff from Ankara and Istanbul in late 2023. Despite a brief thaw in relations in 2022–2023, Israel and Turkey have been increasingly at loggerheads since the 7 October 2023 attack on Israel. Ankara initially condemned Israel’s military actions, later describing its war on Gaza as genocide and imposing trade sanctions in 2024. Tensions escalated beyond rhetoric earlier this year over Syria. Last month, Israeli strikes targeted the Abu al-Duhur military airbase in northern Syria, approximately 70km from the Turkish border. Israel claimed that Turkey was preparing to deploy air defence systems at the base, alleging that they could restrict Israel’s freedom to conduct air operations. There is a general expectation in Ankara that a possible defeat for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the upcoming general elections in October could reopen dialogue between Turkey and Israel. The Israeli official, however, argued that Netanyahu’s government could survive by forming a different coalition with other parties. Such a change, the official added, could bring broader shifts in Israeli policy towards the region. The official also argued that the biggest problem between the two countries was “incitement against Israel” in the Turkish media. Inside Turkey Ankara News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

'Radical' and 'brutal': Texas curriculum to change how Islam is portrayed

S9

'Radical' and 'brutal': Texas curriculum to change how Islam is portrayed Submitted by MEE staff on Wed, 09/09/2026 - 16:20 The move follows vehement anti-Muslim rhetoric and action from Governor Greg Abbott Students hold a protest against Customs and Immigration Enforcement policies outside their school on 6 February 2026 in Austin, Texas (Brandon Bell/Getty Images via AFP) Off The Texas State Board of Education greenlit a new social studies curriculum on Friday that will teach high school students about how Islam is "radical" and "brutal". The move followed several hours of testimony by hundreds of people before the Republican-dominated board made its 8-4 decision about how to amend the way religions are taught across public schools in the state. The new curriculum will affect some five million students. Starting in the 2030-2031 school year, when the textbooks are phased in, the focus will shift to making Bible passages required reading, highlighting Christianity's positive attributes, and referring to early Islam's military campaigns as "brutal" despite not using the same term to describe wars waged by Christians. Teaching early Islam will be specifically framed through a lens of slavery and female captivity, the Fox4 Dallas-Fort Worth news channel reported. The attacks of 11 September 2001, carried out by Saudi hijackers and largely planned by al-Qaeda, will be taught as motivated by "radical Islam" rather than political causes or agendas. Critics slammed the decision. "Selective history is not education. Texas students deserve history that is accurate, complete, and fair," Salman Bhojani, a Muslim lawmaker in the state house, wrote on X ahead of the vote last week. The Council on American Islamic Relations (Cair), the country's largest Muslim civil rights organisation, led the pushback against the new curriculum. "For the record, no one asked the Texas State Board of Education to censor history," the group wrote on X ahead of the vote. "Public schools should teach history, including the history of global religions. What public schools should not do is force teachers and students to single out and denigrate a particular religion, in this case Islam," Cair said. "We would object just as strongly if a state wanted to force teachers to tell students that Christianity itself is responsible for the genocide of indigenous populations, or the burning of witches, or the mass enslavement and forced conversion of kidnapped Africans, or the cross-burnings of the KKK, or the bombing of abortion clinics. " But Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz, who has long been vocal about his anti-Islam position, said Texas "students deserve to know the truth about Islam", in a post on X. The US Constitution maintains that the US has no official state religion and that church and state functions must be separate. Concerted effort The decision was not so surprising, given several moves by the Republican Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, against any manner of accommodation for the state's sizeable and fast-growing Muslim population. Last month the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) International Airport cancelled a project to install an ablution station that could be used by Muslims before they go through the international terminal's airport security. Texas governor designates Muslim Brotherhood, Cair as terror organisations Read More » This followed a threat by Abbott to withhold state grants from airports taking part in any similar projects. Airports in the US are typically state-run in the pre-security section open to the public and federally run in the post-security section, which is exclusively for ticket-holding travellers. Last year, Abbott pushed for a federal investigation into a Muslim housing development just outside of Dallas when he posted on X: "Sharia law is not allowed in Texas. " His post came shortly after Amy Mekelburg, a far-right agitator known for spreading anti-Muslim disinformation, falsely labelled the proposed development a "Sharia City". Abbott amplified the message, characterising Muslim families building homes as a threat. The East Plano Islamic Community, now called The Meadow, is designed to have 1,000 homes as well as a mosque and school. In May, a Texas judge backed the Muslim developers and said the state must honour previously signed contracts. Also last year, Abbott designated Cair as well as the Muslim Brotherhood as both foreign terrorist organisations and transnational criminal organisations. As a result, both groups would be barred "from purchasing or acquiring land" in the state of Texas, Abbott said. The proclamation gives the state's attorney general leeway to sue the groups accordingly. Cair has denied and rebuked the allegations, and the Muslim Brotherhood is not a US-based entity, nor does it have a specific headquarters anywhere. US Muslims News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

At the 9/11 museum, America remembers only its own

S9

At the 9/11 museum, America remembers only its own Submitted by Azad Essa on Sat, 09/05/2026 - 13:23 New York City's 9/11 museum preserves American trauma while obscuring the attacks’ political context and the millions abroad subjected to the so-called global 'war on terror' The rubble of the World Trade Center on 11 September 2001 in New York. 11 September 2026 will mark the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania (Alexandre Fuchs/AFP) Off The 9/11 Memorial & Museum has preserved almost everything. Seventy feet beneath Ground Zero are burnt-out fire trucks, mangled steel beams, firefighters’ helmets, survivors’ watches, and the final messages left by passengers aboard the hijacked planes. Visitors can watch the towers being struck from several angles and listen to the voices of those on the hijacked planes who knew they were unlikely to make it out alive. Ahead of the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, which killed 2,977 people in New York, Virginia and Pennsylvania, I visited the museum to examine the story it tells of that day - and what it omits. Even the most carefully managed narratives can contain details that quietly subvert it. I was looking forward to being surprised, given that 9/11 is among the most consequential events of the 21st century. I spent close to three hours inside, circling the exhibits several times. I watched as visitors sighed, gasped, and covered their mouths upon encountering the images and videos from that shocking day. I eavesdropped on conversations, closely read the captions accompanying the artefacts on display, and sat down to absorb the scale of the event in all our lives. The surprise, however, would never arrive. Relentless collection The 9/11 Memorial & Museum opened in May 2014. The massive museum - covering 110,000 square feet of exhibition space - is built into the structure of the original complex, with an exposed underground retaining wall built in the 1960s to keep water from the Hudson River out. Half of Americans think post-9/11 wars were worth it, poll shows Read More » The museum holds more than 83,000 artefacts from the destruction on that day. Voice recordings and transcripts from flight staff, final voice messages from husbands on board the flights to their wives, shocking footage of people jumping out of the windows of the towers, the planes hitting the World Trade Center (WTC) towers from different angles, and smoke billowing over the New York skyline make for a relentless replaying of that day. In the main hall, there are mini-exhibits spread throughout. An area focused on the unifying symbolism of the American flag; a set of touch-screens where visitors are encouraged to sign messages of love and support; a separate glass exhibit containing a miniature model of Osama bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad. Even more curious is another cabinet that holds a single brick ostensibly from the compound itself, following the US Navy Seal raid in May 2011. The code name used for bin Laden during the operation in which he was killed, the museum reminds us, was "Geronimo". Visitors are sent into an endless loop of reliving that day's trauma. And it was often not presented in a fully chronological order. In the "Historical Exhibition", perhaps the core exhibit, visitors experience the trauma multiple times. The repetition makes the event feel as if it is live, happening at that precise moment. The exhibit is suffocating; the corners of the passageway are tight, and one feels bombarded by the sounds and images. "The shock of 9/11 becomes eternally present. And as we are invited to share the perspective of that day, we become as ignorant as those whom we observe dying or surviving, doing their best to help or simply to escape," Ross Poole writes. The museum isn't merely about the events of 11 September, but also recounts the 1993 attack on the WTC, underlining the towers' status as being among the great symbols of American power, prized by the US public, and therefore ultimately razed by their enemies. The retainer wall inside the 9/11 museum (MEE) But the historical context and global consequences of what transpired that day are in short supply. Those who may have come to the museum to understand why such an incident would occur in the first place are likely to leave with a very truncated and dubious version of history and the present day. Funding 'terrorists' In its narration of the attacks of 11 September 2001, the museum says that these were carried out by "al-Qaeda - an international Islamist extremist terrorist network" founded in the 1980s whose aims include wanting to "overthrow governments in the Middle East, and elsewhere in the Muslim world, which do not strictly enforce a religiously sanctioned political and social order". "Attacks against the United States were intended to reduce American support for many of these governments; US support was viewed by al-Qaeda as a major obstacle to creating a global order under Islamic authority," the museum says. Unlike the exhaustive reconstruction of 9/11, these details are sparse and intentionally obtuse. "As part of the Cold War - the struggle between the Soviet Union and the United States - the US supported the Afghan rebellion by funnelling money and arms through Pakistan. The CIA provided money to recruit Afghans but did not directly fund foreign militants," one of the captions at the museum reads. This description is evasive. Washington deliberately channelled funds via Pakistan as a means to preserve plausible deniability. Instead of explaining the statecraft, it became part of it. A brick from Osama Bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan (MEE) Whereas the museum had the opportunity to examine how the US-backed war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan helped create the infrastructure and conditions from which al-Qaeda emerged, it chose to foreground al-Qaeda’s religious ideology as a principal explanation for its militancy. In so doing, it became another vessel of Islamophobia. The global 'war on terror' The museum also has very little to say about the so-called global "war on terror". The attacks of 9/11 took place on the morning of a particular day in 2001, but the wars launched in response lasted more than 20 years. They killed nearly a million people and led to the displacement of 37 million people across the globe. The attacks of 11 September 2001 became the pretext for a vast expansion of surveillance across American society, directed particularly at Muslims. There was the use of black sites for torture and documented abuse at detention facilities like Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. In the US, the events of 9/11 were used to turn immigration into a matter of national security, leading to the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Even entering the museum felt like a trip to the airport. On entering the lobby, I was directed to one of those large cylindrical booths that one typically encounters when travelling today. I removed my belongings, including my belt, and raised my hands as the body scanner swung by. Still unconvinced, the security guard conducted a gentle frisk to see if I had concealed anything in my back pocket. I should note that not everyone was asked to go through the cylindrical booths. Others were directed to general metal detectors. In this way, the museum may not have needed to say much about the legacy of 9/11. It was a living example of its excesses. And so while the museum meticulously gives names, faces and voices to those killed in America, those killed in America’s response remain nameless and faceless. It was fitting that almost none of the visitors I saw were people of colour. A staff member told me he had reservations about the lack of any portrayal of the global war on terror. He didn't want to say more. Among the museum's honorary trustees is former US President George W Bush, who presided over the beginning of that campaign. The museum felt like a time capsule - with a $36 entry ticket - a place where an old story was still being sold to muster confusion and hatred, while above, an entirely new world was taking shape. In the real world, the official story of 9/11 is now often treated by a younger public with derision, and in memes, and is seen as a pretext for war and global extraction. As I walked through the museum and looked at the exhibit dignifying the lives of thousands of people who died that day, I thought about the nameless and faceless people who died in Afghanistan and Iraq. When I read about how dust storms from the collapse of the towers had infiltrated lungs and caused disease, I thought about the people of Gaza, who have endured around 78 percent of their homes and buildings being razed to the ground with US weaponry and political backing. These were two large towers that collapsed to the ground in New York City. The city had to remove 1.8 million tonnes of debris. In New York, more people subsequently died from related diseases, including blood and lung cancers, than the actual attacks themselves. On 8 September, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani released 170,000 pages of previously undisclosed records on air quality following the attack, showing New York City officials knew conditions around Ground Zero made it unsafe to breathe. In the Gaza Strip, it is an entire 365-square-kilometre enclave covered in plumes of smoke and dust, with few medical supplies, clean water or aid. The United Nations estimates that "more than 61 million tonnes of debris will require clearing" in Gaza. In this aerial view, People walk amid the destruction in Gaza City in the northern Gaza Strip on October 11, 2025, a day after a ceasefire took effect (AFP) I thought about a US military judge ruling just days earlier who concluded that statements made to the FBI by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, could not be used at trial because they were tainted by the torture and abuse he had endured in CIA custody. His trial is set to begin on 5 June 2028 - nearly 25 years after his arrest. The museum's method of retelling the story of the attack and its failure over the past decade to include the so-called global war on terror in its curation made it feel like part of the larger enterprise of war-making in America. The trauma had a purpose. It was to keep visitors numb, or busy shopping. “Thank you for visiting the museum,” an usher says as visitors exit the escalator to the ground floor. He reminded us all to visit the museum store, where patrons could buy 9/11 magnets, T-shirts, American flags, and “Never Forget” mugs made in Thailand. 'Reflecting absence' At ground level, alongside the museum, two giant square pools make up the 9/11 memorial. On exiting the museum, I returned to the memorial, where hundreds continued to gather to reflect, take photos or just catch a glimpse of the historic site. How the US revived ‘war on terror’ era surveillance to suppress pro-Palestine movement Read More » Here, water cascades down the sides of a wall before streaming and disappearing down another square deep in the pool. Around the pools, the names of those who were killed on that day are cut into the wall. These two striking artworks, named 'Reflecting Absence ', were unveiled in 2011. Michael Arad, the architect of the 9/11 memorial, said he imagined “two voids tearing open a surface of water and the river failing to fill it up". This image, he added, captured “a sense of rupture and continued absence”. Water drips down the square and into another opening, as if entering a void. The metaphor is powerful, but maybe not as the designers originally intended. It felt as if the memorial asked us not to forget the void. The museum, however, appeared to pull us all further into it. 9/11 Attacks New York City News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Sanctions on Israeli settlements: Here’s what Europe is saying and doing

S9

Sanctions on Israeli settlements: Here’s what Europe is saying and doing Submitted by Daniel Tester on Tue, 09/08/2026 - 15:20 The announcement by the UK against the West Bank occupation echoes unease in France, Spain, Ireland and Norway, among others The Israeli government wants to build settlements in the E1 corridor in the occupied West Bank, pictured here in September 2026 (AFP) On Relations between Israel and European states have deteriorated after the UK led moves on Tuesday to impose sanctions against Israeli settlements. In London, UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, using some of the harshest language by a government minister about Israel, said that the decision came amid the “ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank perpetrated by settler terrorists”. In Paris, meanwhile, his opposite number Jean-Noel Barrot announced similar measures, saying that “France cannot, through its trade, support a situation that threatens the security of Israelis and Palestinians alike”. In a joint statement, they, along with the foreign ministers of Spain, Ireland Norway and others, confirmed their intention to “introduce national and/or support European restrictions on trade in goods with settlements which are illegal under international law, or that they are actively considering these and other measures, in accordance with their national procedures”. Several countries, notably Sweden, Denmark and Finland, later stated that they would only impose sanctions as part of joint EU action rather than unilaterally, according to Israeli media reports. The announcements came amid growing international condemnation of attacks by Israeli settlers on Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, as well as the expansion of settlements by the government of Benjamin Netanyahu. Several European countries previously issued sanctions following a 2024 ruling from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that the settlements were illegal under international law. The moves come amid deadlock in the EU over proposals to introduce an EU-wide ban on settlement goods, with key states such as Germany and Italy stalling. UK The UK played a leading role in Tuesday’s 12-nation sanctions on settlements, with the joint statement released at the same time as a speech from Miliband in the UK parliament. The UK will now have some of the strongest policies against the settlements, targeting the import of goods from settlements, investment in settlement businesses and properties, and advertisement of services in settlements. Announcing the measures, Miliband accused the Israeli government of turning a “blind eye” to the displacement of Palestinians in the West Bank, where over 450,000 Israeli settlers now live, adding: “The action we are taking today is against the government of Israel, not its people. " UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband announces UK sanctions against Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank on 8 September 2026 (House of Parliament/AFP) Israel lashed out in response, closing the British consulate in occupied East Jerusalem, ejecting British representatives from the International Gaza Support Center, and banning 11 British MPs from entering Israel (none have government roles). Relations between London and Tel Aviv have worsened in recent months, with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu sparking fury in Westminster in August by referring to the UK as the “Islamic Republic of Britain”. France Until this week, France had not banned imports of goods from Israeli settlements, despite efforts from opposition lawmakers and ex-diplomats. But in a statement on X on Tuesday, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said that “France cannot, through its trade, support a situation that threatens the security of Israelis and Palestinians alike”. Paris previously sanctioned around 50 individual settlers, plus some of the organisations that run outposts that have not been approved by the Israeli government. France has also led calls for a ban on trade with the settlements at an EU level, where talks have stalled for months. “The settlements are illegal,” Barrot previously said on 5 September, citing the ICJ ruling. “It is not normal that the European Union can support this trade. ” He added that the EU’s response should match the swift action it took to halt imports from Crimea following its occupation by Russia in 2014. “This is the same thing that we must do with the illegal settlements. ” Spain One of Europe’s firmest critics of Israel, the government headed by centre-left Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez banned imports from Israeli settlements in September 2025. Under the law, all produce from anywhere in Israel or the occupied territories must specify its postcode of origin, with penalties for non-compliance. Also banned are advertisements for services based in West Bank settlements. In line with the law, Spain said in December that it had ordered seven companies, which it did not name, to remove listings for rental properties in settlements. It later investigated when Israeli firms advertised settlement properties at an international tourism fair in Madrid in January. Demonstrators hold a canvas with a detail from Pablo Picasso's Guernica next to a giant Palestinian flag in San Sebastian, Spain, in January 2024 (AFP) Spain has issued other measures to curb its involvement in Israel’s genocide in Gaza and the war on Iran: in October 2025, for example, it issued an embargo on the sale of weapons and dual-use goods to Israel, and a ban on imports of Israeli-made military goods to Spain, albeit with some exceptions. Madrid has also prohibited vessels transporting fuel for the Israeli military from using its ports, and planes supplying Israel with military equipment from crossing its airspace. The measures have damaged Spanish relations with Israel, which in 2024 recalled its ambassador after Spain recognised Palestinian statehood. Madrid in turn pulled its ambassador from Tel Aviv the following year. Relations with the US have also suffered, with President Donald Trump hitting Spain with fresh tariffs in June, and threatening to cut off US trade completely in July. Ireland Although a signatory to Tuesday’s joint statement, Ireland had previously banned the import of goods from settlements in July, amid wide support for Palestine and criticism of Israel across the country. A law banning goods and services from Israeli settlements was initially proposed in 2018, but shelved amid fears it could fall foul of EU trade regulations. Provisions within the bill to ban services based in illegal settlements were dropped after they were rejected by senators from Ireland’s centre-right governing coalition, fearful it might cause economic harm and a backlash from the US. The change prompted anger from opposition lawmakers, who said that the legislation had been “watered down”, and was not compliant with international law. Under the current law, websites such as Airbnb, which has its European headquarters in Dublin, face no restrictions on advertising property rentals in the illegal settlements to Irish customers. But the ban on goods was nonetheless criticised by Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel. “Did the Irish fall into a vat of Guinness? ” he posted on X, calling the new law an act of “diplomatic intoxication”. Netherlands The Netherlands banned the import of goods produced in Israeli settlements in May, with the law due to come into effect on 22 September. But the measures, which will apply for a fixed three-year period, do not prohibit trade in services based in settlements, other than financial services directly relating to the import of banned goods. Relations between Amsterdam and Tel Aviv have worsened since the law was announced. Israel expelled two Dutch representatives from the US-led International Gaza Support Center in the Israeli city of Kiryat Gat on 25 August. Norway In June, Norway’s government proposed a law banning the import and export of all goods to and from Israeli settlements. Public consultation on the bill ends on 19 September. The proposal also includes a trade ban on “services related to the construction, renovation, purchase or sale of property” in the settlements, and “acquiring businesses with headquarters and production”. Norway's Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store, right, and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in Oslo, Norway in February 2026 (AFP) Announcing the proposals in June, Espen Barth Eide, Norway’s foreign minister, said: “The settlements undermine the basis for a Palestinian state. “Norwegian citizens and Norwegian companies must not contribute to maintaining this development. With this legislative proposal, the government takes a clear stance”. Belgium In July, Belgium’s cabinet announced that it had approved a ban on imports of settlement goods, just before parliament closed for its summer recess until October. Full details of the law, which awaits review before it takes effect, have not been made public. Belgium stopped offering consular services to its citizens living in Israeli settlements in January. Sweden Stockholm’s decision to align itself with the UK, France and others on Tuesday appears to be a hardening of its position. Back in April, it only proposed creating tariffs on settlement goods imported at the EU level. That measure, intended to “differentiate this trade from other trade”, according to Sweden’s foreign ministry in April, fell short of calling for a trade ban. But Sweden’s foreign minister, Maria Stenergard, said on Tuesday that her government now “believes that more needs to be done to reduce trade with Israeli settlements”, which she said “violate international law and undermine the two-state solution”. Denmark Denmark was also a signatory to the 12-country statement announcing a prospective ban. “Israel's settlement policy is illegal & undermines a two-state solution. E1 plans are unacceptable,” Foreign Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen said on Tuesday. Demonstrators protest as part of “All of Denmark on the Streets for a Free Palestine” at Christiansborg Palace Square, Copenhagen in August 2025 (AFP) But Denmark caused confusion when it told Haaretz on Wednesday that it would either impose national restrictions or instead support EU measures to bring in such restrictions. The latter move would amount to little change on its previous position, as the embassy said that Denmark had “for some time” called for an EU-wide trade ban on settlements. Finland Finland also signed the 12-country statement pledging to ban settlement goods on Tuesday, although it has not yet provided further details on its proposed policy. A statement posted by Finland’s foreign ministry on Tuesday said that the “viability of the two-state solution is being steadily undermined by settlement expansion and escalating settler violence. This must stop. International law must be upheld and [the] path to peace preserved,” the ministry added. Finland has generally maintained a cautious foreign policy since it became a Nato member in 2023, not least because it depends on US security assurances against its neighbour, Russia. But the move to ban settlement goods comes as support for the US and Israel has fallen amid the US-Israeli war on Iran. Iceland Iceland was also among the 12 countries announcing a ban on settlements on Tuesday, although it has yet to formally comment. The announcement came hours after Trump posted a map on Truth Social that appeared to show Iceland as part of the US, prompting Iceland to summon the American ambassador. Iceland joined South Africa’s long-stalled genocide case against Israel at the ICJ in March. Poland While Warsaw has been opposed to full sanctions against Israel, it has voiced increasing disquiet in recent years about proposals for illegal settlements. In August, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the plans to build in the West Bank’s E1 area were a “flagrant breach of international law”. In a signal that it was mulling sanctions against settlements, it said: “We are communicating with the EU’s diplomacy and our European partners to come up with a joint response to these measures. ” Portugal Portugal added its name to the list of countries banning settlement goods on Tuesday amid growing domestic discontent over Israeli conduct in the West Bank and Gaza. A statement posted by the country’s foreign ministry said that Portugal “has consistently defended and advocated” for banning settlement goods in private EU discussions. Former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa currently leads the European Council. The EU This week’s announcements on sanctions on Israeli settlements came amid long-standing deadlock on the issue at the EU. France and Sweden previously proposed measures against settlement imports at the EU level, only for it to stall amid opposition from Germany and Italy, two of the continent’s largest economies. Germany has for decades been among Tel Aviv’s firmest allies in Europe, and currently faces a case at the ICJ over its weapons sales to Israel during its genocide in Gaza. Israeli opposition accuses Netanyahu of fuelling diplomatic isolation after UK sanctions Read More » Italy, meanwhile, has seen its ties with Israel flourish under right-wing Prime Minister Georgia Meloni, although they have lost momentum in recent months amid Rome’s tepid support for the US-Israeli war on Iran. Both countries were also notable for their absence in Tuesday’s joint declaration - but Johann Wadephul, Germany’s foreign minister from the embattled Christian Democratic Union party, still insists that Berlin is opposed to Israeli settlements in the West Bank. “We have a clear position on settlement policy: it is inconsistent with international law,” he said in August, adding that he had “made this clear” to the Israeli government that month. Other countries that have opposed EU action on settlements include Austria, where a right-wing government is in charge, and Slovenia, the first country in Europe to ban imports of goods from Israeli settlements in August 2025. But new conservative Prime Minister Janez Jansa overturned that decision during his first week in office in June and also lifted other measures against Israel, including an arms embargo and entry ban on Netanyahu and other officials. The moves were welcomed by Israel, where Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called Jansa a “bold leader and true friend”, and announced that Israel would open an embassy in Ljubljana (it had previously run consular services from neighbouring Austria). Occupation Explainers Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:29 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Japan’s China-facing military build-up confronts labour, budget and political limits

S8

The risk of a conflict over Taiwan is shaping Japanese defence planning, with Tokyo shoring up security at home and abroad for a potentially prolonged fight. But there are economic, demographic and political constraints on how far its military transformation can go. In the third of a three-part series, Gabriel Dominguez examines the various challenges confronting Japan in its bid to expand its military. Driven by the growing risk that a conflict over Taiwan could draw Tokyo into a high-intensity...

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

How Nicaragua defended its ICJ case accusing Germany of complicity in Israel's genocide

S9

How Nicaragua defended its ICJ case accusing Germany of complicity in Israel's genocide Submitted by Sondos Asem on Wed, 09/09/2026 - 11:01 Managua urged judges to reject German objections, highlighting Berlin's own duties to prevent genocide and other grave violations against Palestinians The Agent of Nicaragua, Mr Carlos Arguello Gomez, speaks at the International Court of Justice in the Hague on Tuesday 8 September 2026 (UN Photo/ICJ/Frank van Beek) Off Nicaragua has accused Germany of trying to shield its support for Israel from judicial scrutiny, telling the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that Berlin continued to authorise substantial military exports despite knowing of the serious risk of genocide and other violations against Palestinians. Appearing before the court in The Hague on Tuesday, Nicaragua urged judges to reject Germany’s preliminary objections and allow its case against Berlin to proceed to the merits. The proceedings concern Germany’s alleged breaches of the Genocide Convention and international humanitarian law in relation to its alleged support for Israel’s conduct in occupied Palestine. Nicaragua filed the case in March 2024, accusing Germany of facilitating genocide by supplying Israel with weapons and suspending funding to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, Unrwa. Tuesday’s hearing focused on Berlin’s arguments that the court lacks jurisdiction or that Nicaragua’s claims are inadmissible. Germany has argued, among other things, that no legal dispute existed between the two countries when Nicaragua filed the case, that some claims fall outside the temporal limits of its acceptance of the court’s jurisdiction, and that Israel is an indispensable third party whose conduct cannot be adjudicated in its absence. Nicaragua rejected each objection, insisting that the case concerns Germany’s own conduct and obligations, not Israel’s. Nicaragua’s ambassador to the Netherlands, Carlos Arguello Gomez, told the court that Managua was invoking Germany’s responsibility in connection with alleged breaches of the Genocide Convention, international humanitarian law, the Palestinian right to self-determination, and the prohibitions of racial discrimination, racial segregation and apartheid. The claims also include alleged violations of Germany’s duties not to recognise or assist serious breaches of international law, and to investigate, prosecute and punish international crimes, such as war crimes and genocide. Nicaragua's legal team attending a hearing at the ICJ on 8 September 2026 (ICJ photo) Arguello said that, unlike under Nazi Germany, the destruction and suffering inflicted on Palestinians had been documented publicly and "livestreamed", making it impossible for the German government to argue that it did not know of the risk of grave violations. "Over the past three years, every single day people around the world bear witness to horrible scenes of brutality, suffering and destruction," he said. "Schoolchildren in Germany are probably more aware today of what is happening in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and particularly the Gaza Strip, than their ancestors were of the horrors during the Nazi regime. " Germany’s close political, commercial and military relations with Israel meant it "could not [but] be aware, or normally should have been aware", of the serious risk that acts amounting to genocide were being committed, he said. Germany is Israel’s second-largest arms supplier and one of its most important trading partners, giving Berlin substantial means to influence its conduct, Nicaragua argued. Arms exports continue Nicaragua recalled that in its April 2024 order declining to impose provisional measures against Germany, the ICJ nevertheless reminded all states of their obligations regarding arms transfers to parties to armed conflicts. The court said those obligations were incumbent on Germany in its supply of weapons to Israel. Nicaragua said Berlin had ignored that warning. It disputed Germany’s earlier claim that 98 percent of the exports in question consisted of subordinate or protective equipment. According to figures presented by Nicaragua, Germany authorised more than €1.15bn ($1.34bn) in military exports to Israel between early April 2024 and the end of June 2026. Germany asks ICJ to dismiss Gaza genocide case brought by Nicaragua Read More » In the first half of 2026 alone, Germany approved almost €800m in military exports, Nicaragua said. Information released by the German government shortly before the hearing indicated that €508.8m of this amount related to weapons of war. The licences included a major maritime defence project, believed to involve a submarine, as well as ammunition, projectiles, propelling charges and other essential components. Nicaragua also highlighted German-made engines and transmission systems used in Israel’s Merkava tanks, which have been deployed extensively in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. The total value of German military equipment authorised for export to Israel since 7 October 2023 had exceeded €1.5bn ($1.75bn), Nicaragua told the court. Berlin announced in August 2025 that it would suspend new authorisations for military equipment that could be used in Gaza. Nicaragua described the measure as largely symbolic because deliveries under previously approved licences were allowed to continue. New approvals resumed in November 2025. Germany’s assurances that it assesses each licence separately and receives guarantees from Israel that equipment will be used in accordance with international humanitarian law did not discharge its international obligations, Nicaragua said. Arguello also pointed to the extensive trade flowing in the other direction. Germany’s agreement to purchase Israel’s Arrow 3 missile defence system, originally valued at $3.5bn, was expanded in December, bringing its value to approximately $6.6bn. "This was described as the largest defence export contract in Israel’s history," said Arguello. Nicaragua argued that these contracts created a mutually profitable, long-term military relationship that helped insulate Israel from sanctions. Arguello challenged Germany’s assertion that its support for Israel formed part of its reason of state, or "Staatsrason", arising from its historic responsibility for the Holocaust. "The trial of the war criminals at Nuremberg was for multiple crimes against humanity as a whole and not only for the Jewish Shoah," he said. "If there is a sincere moral imperative justifying this raison d’état, it must be for the responsibility for all these crimes against humanity, and it should involve the obligation to do all possible to stop this from happening to other human beings. "A sincere raison d’état would see Germany doing everything possible to stop the crimes being committed by Israel against the Palestinian people. " Germany's duty to prevent genocide Germany’s key objection is based on the "Monetary Gold principle", under which the ICJ generally cannot decide a case if the legal responsibility of an absent, non-consenting state would constitute the very subject matter of its judgment. Germany argues that the court could not decide whether Berlin failed to prevent or facilitated violations without first determining that Israel committed the underlying wrongful acts. Nicaragua rejected that argument, saying it had not asked the court to adjudge that Israel was responsible or to issue any ruling binding Israel. 'A sincere raison d’état would see Germany doing everything possible to stop the crimes being committed by Israel against the Palestinian people' - Carlos Arguello Gomez, Nicaragua’s agent Its submissions ask the court to determine whether Germany breached its own obligations and to order Berlin to make full reparation for harm caused by its own internationally wrongful acts. Israel’s conduct was the factual background against which Germany’s actions would be assessed, but the case did not require a ruling on Israel’s international responsibility, Nicaragua’s counsel Alain Pellet said. For many of Nicaragua’s claims, it was sufficient to establish that there was a serious risk of genocide or other grave violations, rather than proving conclusively that Israel was responsible for genocide. The obligation to prevent genocide arises when a state knows, or should normally know, of a serious risk that genocide will be committed, Nicaragua said. From that point, it must use all means reasonably available to deter or prevent it. This is an obligation of conduct, rather than a guarantee that the prohibited outcome will be avoided. Nicaragua said Germany’s capacity to influence Israel was "indisputable" because of the close political, military and economic ties between the two states. Pellet acknowledged that the ICJ had previously said in 2007 that a state could ultimately be held responsible for failing to prevent genocide only if genocide had in fact occurred. But he argued that the duty to act arises earlier, at the moment a serious risk becomes known. "The obligation to prevent and the corresponding duty to act arise for a state at the moment when it becomes aware, or should normally have become aware, of the existence of a serious risk that genocide will be committed," he said. Waiting until genocide or crimes against humanity had been completed before addressing a failure to prevent them would be "absurd" he said, as it would defeat the purpose of the relevant obligations. Nicaragua stressed that the serious risk had now materialised and that genocide was continuing in Gaza and elsewhere in occupied Palestine. "Tragically, genocide has occurred and continues to occur, not only in the Gaza Strip but throughout the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem," Pellet told the court in a French-language presentation. "The gravest violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, which all states have the duty – the legal obligation – to prevent, are continuing; and the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination is being denied more than ever. " Apartheid and racial discrimination Nicaragua also defended the court’s jurisdiction over its claims concerning racial discrimination, racial segregation and apartheid. Counsel Ardi Imseis said these prohibitions did not arise solely from the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Cerd). They also formed part of customary international law, international humanitarian law and other treaty obligations. The ICJ has previously recognised the prohibition of racial discrimination as an obligation owed to the international community as a whole. It has also held that the prohibition is a fundamental component of humanitarian law. Guilt, grief and strength: Gaza’s ‘sole survivor’ children face life alone Read More » Claims arising under these independent bodies of law consequently fell within Germany’s optional declaration accepting the court’s jurisdiction, Nicaragua argued. Germany has argued that key claims fall outside its declaration accepting ICJ jurisdiction only over disputes concerning facts or situations after 30 April 2008. But Nicaragua said the "real cause" of the case was Berlin’s recent conduct, particularly its arms-export approvals and other support for Israel after October 2023, while the countries’ longstanding relationship was merely historical background. Nicaragua is due to present its second round of oral arguments on Thursday, when it will also deliver its final submissions. If the court accepts Nicaragua's arguments, the case will go ahead, but it could take years for it to reach a final judgment. The ICJ is currently hearing a separate case brought by South Africa against Israel, accusing it of breaching the Genocide Convention in its war on Gaza since October 2023. A panel of eminent UN experts, as well as the world's largest association of genocide scholars, have already concluded that Israel's campaign in Gaza amounted to the crime of genocide. A fragile, US-brokered ceasefire has been in effect since October last year. But since then, Israel has killed at least 1,300 Palestinians in Gaza, bringing the genocide's death toll to over 73,651. Thousands more are missing and presumed dead under the rubble. International law News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Daily Memo: Iran Update, Strikes in Saudi Arabia

S9

Retaliation. U. S. Central Command said it destroyed five Iranian oil tankers in response to Iran’s ballistic missile attacks on a U. S. Navy warship. Four of the Iranian vessels were attacked in the Gulf of Oman and another near Kharg Island. S. In response, Iran launched missiles at U. targets in Jordan. The Jordanian military said that [… ] The post Daily Memo: Iran Update, Strikes in Saudi Arabia appeared first on Geopolitical Futures.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

How Nicaragua argued at the ICJ that Germany was complicit in Israel’s genocide

S9

How Nicaragua argued at the ICJ that Germany was complicit in Israel’s genocide Submitted by Sondos Asem on Wed, 09/09/2026 - 11:01 Managua urged judges to reject German objections, highlighting Berlin's own duties to prevent genocide and other grave violations against Palestinians The Agent of Nicaragua, Mr Carlos Arguello Gomez, speaks at the International Court of Justice in the Hague on Tuesday 8 September 2026 (UN Photo/ICJ/Frank van Beek) Off Nicaragua has accused Germany of trying to shield its support for Israel from judicial scrutiny, telling the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that Berlin continued to authorise substantial military exports despite knowing of the serious risk of genocide and other violations against Palestinians. Appearing before the court in The Hague on Tuesday, Nicaragua urged judges to reject Germany’s preliminary objections and allow its case against Berlin to proceed to the merits. The proceedings concern Germany’s alleged breaches of the Genocide Convention and international humanitarian law in relation to its alleged support for Israel’s conduct in occupied Palestine. Nicaragua filed the case in March 2024, accusing Germany of facilitating genocide by supplying Israel with weapons and suspending funding to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, Unrwa. Tuesday’s hearing focused on Berlin’s arguments that the court lacks jurisdiction or that Nicaragua’s claims are inadmissible. Germany has argued, among other things, that no legal dispute existed between the two countries when Nicaragua filed the case, that some claims fall outside the temporal limits of its acceptance of the court’s jurisdiction, and that Israel is an indispensable third party whose conduct cannot be adjudicated in its absence. Nicaragua rejected each objection, insisting that the case concerns Germany’s own conduct and obligations, not Israel’s. Nicaragua’s ambassador to the Netherlands, Carlos Arguello Gomez, told the court that Managua was invoking Germany’s responsibility in connection with alleged breaches of the Genocide Convention, international humanitarian law, the Palestinian right to self-determination, and the prohibitions of racial discrimination, racial segregation and apartheid. The claims also include alleged violations of Germany’s duties not to recognise or assist serious breaches of international law, and to investigate, prosecute and punish international crimes, such as war crimes and genocide. Nicaragua's legal team attending a hearing at the ICJ on 8 September 2026 (ICJ photo) Arguello said that, unlike under Nazi Germany, the destruction and suffering inflicted on Palestinians had been documented publicly and "livestreamed", making it impossible for the German government to argue that it did not know of the risk of grave violations. "Over the past three years, every single day people around the world bear witness to horrible scenes of brutality, suffering and destruction," he said. "Schoolchildren in Germany are probably more aware today of what is happening in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and particularly the Gaza Strip, than their ancestors were of the horrors during the Nazi regime. " Germany’s close political, commercial and military relations with Israel meant it "could not [but] be aware, or normally should have been aware", of the serious risk that acts amounting to genocide were being committed, he said. Germany is Israel’s second-largest arms supplier and one of its most important trading partners, giving Berlin substantial means to influence its conduct, Nicaragua argued. Arms exports continue Nicaragua recalled that in its April 2024 order declining to impose provisional measures against Germany, the ICJ nevertheless reminded all states of their obligations regarding arms transfers to parties to armed conflicts. The court said those obligations were incumbent on Germany in its supply of weapons to Israel. Nicaragua said Berlin had ignored that warning. It disputed Germany’s earlier claim that 98 percent of the exports in question consisted of subordinate or protective equipment. According to figures presented by Nicaragua, Germany authorised more than €1.15bn ($1.34bn) in military exports to Israel between early April 2024 and the end of June 2026. Germany asks ICJ to dismiss Gaza genocide case brought by Nicaragua Read More » In the first half of 2026 alone, Germany approved almost €800m in military exports, Nicaragua said. Information released by the German government shortly before the hearing indicated that €508.8m of this amount related to weapons of war. The licences included a major maritime defence project, believed to involve a submarine, as well as ammunition, projectiles, propelling charges and other essential components. Nicaragua also highlighted German-made engines and transmission systems used in Israel’s Merkava tanks, which have been deployed extensively in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. The total value of German military equipment authorised for export to Israel since 7 October 2023 had exceeded €1.5bn ($1.75bn), Nicaragua told the court. Berlin announced in August 2025 that it would suspend new authorisations for military equipment that could be used in Gaza. Nicaragua described the measure as largely symbolic because deliveries under previously approved licences were allowed to continue. New approvals resumed in November 2025. Germany’s assurances that it assesses each licence separately and receives guarantees from Israel that equipment will be used in accordance with international humanitarian law did not discharge its international obligations, Nicaragua said. Arguello also pointed to the extensive trade flowing in the other direction. Germany’s agreement to purchase Israel’s Arrow 3 missile defence system, originally valued at $3.5bn, was expanded in December, bringing its value to approximately $6.6bn. "This was described as the largest defence export contract in Israel’s history," said Arguello. Nicaragua argued that these contracts created a mutually profitable, long-term military relationship that helped insulate Israel from sanctions. Arguello challenged Germany’s assertion that its support for Israel formed part of its reason of state, or "Staatsrason", arising from its historic responsibility for the Holocaust. "The trial of the war criminals at Nuremberg was for multiple crimes against humanity as a whole and not only for the Jewish Shoah," he said. "If there is a sincere moral imperative justifying this raison d’état, it must be for the responsibility for all these crimes against humanity, and it should involve the obligation to do all possible to stop this from happening to other human beings. "A sincere raison d’état would see Germany doing everything possible to stop the crimes being committed by Israel against the Palestinian people. " Germany's duty to prevent genocide Germany’s key objection is based on the "Monetary Gold principle", under which the ICJ generally cannot decide a case if the legal responsibility of an absent, non-consenting state would constitute the very subject matter of its judgment. Germany argues that the court could not decide whether Berlin failed to prevent or facilitated violations without first determining that Israel committed the underlying wrongful acts. Nicaragua rejected that argument, saying it had not asked the court to adjudge that Israel was responsible or to issue any ruling binding Israel. 'A sincere raison d’état would see Germany doing everything possible to stop the crimes being committed by Israel against the Palestinian people' - Carlos Arguello Gomez, Nicaragua’s agent Its submissions ask the court to determine whether Germany breached its own obligations and to order Berlin to make full reparation for harm caused by its own internationally wrongful acts. Israel’s conduct was the factual background against which Germany’s actions would be assessed, but the case did not require a ruling on Israel’s international responsibility, Nicaragua’s counsel Alain Pellet said. For many of Nicaragua’s claims, it was sufficient to establish that there was a serious risk of genocide or other grave violations, rather than proving conclusively that Israel was responsible for genocide. The obligation to prevent genocide arises when a state knows, or should normally know, of a serious risk that genocide will be committed, Nicaragua said. From that point, it must use all means reasonably available to deter or prevent it. This is an obligation of conduct, rather than a guarantee that the prohibited outcome will be avoided. Nicaragua said Germany’s capacity to influence Israel was "indisputable" because of the close political, military and economic ties between the two states. Pellet acknowledged that the ICJ had previously said in 2007 that a state could ultimately be held responsible for failing to prevent genocide only if genocide had in fact occurred. But he argued that the duty to act arises earlier, at the moment a serious risk becomes known. "The obligation to prevent and the corresponding duty to act arise for a state at the moment when it becomes aware, or should normally have become aware, of the existence of a serious risk that genocide will be committed," he said. Waiting until genocide or crimes against humanity had been completed before addressing a failure to prevent them would be "absurd" he said, as it would defeat the purpose of the relevant obligations. Nicaragua stressed that the serious risk had now materialised and that genocide was continuing in Gaza and elsewhere in occupied Palestine. "Tragically, genocide has occurred and continues to occur, not only in the Gaza Strip but throughout the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem," Pellet told the court in a French-language presentation. "The gravest violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, which all states have the duty – the legal obligation – to prevent, are continuing; and the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination is being denied more than ever. " Apartheid and racial discrimination Nicaragua also defended the court’s jurisdiction over its claims concerning racial discrimination, racial segregation and apartheid. Counsel Ardi Imseis said these prohibitions did not arise solely from the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Cerd). They also formed part of customary international law, international humanitarian law and other treaty obligations. The ICJ has previously recognised the prohibition of racial discrimination as an obligation owed to the international community as a whole. It has also held that the prohibition is a fundamental component of humanitarian law. Guilt, grief and strength: Gaza’s ‘sole survivor’ children face life alone Read More » Claims arising under these independent bodies of law consequently fell within Germany’s optional declaration accepting the court’s jurisdiction, Nicaragua argued. Germany has argued that key claims fall outside its declaration accepting ICJ jurisdiction only over disputes concerning facts or situations after 30 April 2008. But Nicaragua said the "real cause" of the case was Berlin’s recent conduct, particularly its arms-export approvals and other support for Israel after October 2023, while the countries’ longstanding relationship was merely historical background. Nicaragua is due to present its second round of oral arguments on Thursday, when it will also deliver its final submissions. If the court accepts Nicaragua's arguments, the case will go ahead, but it could take years for it to reach a final judgment. The ICJ is currently hearing a separate case brought by South Africa against Israel, accusing it of breaching the Genocide Convention in its war on Gaza since October 2023. A panel of eminent UN experts, as well as the world's largest association of genocide scholars, have already concluded that Israel's campaign in Gaza amounted to the crime of genocide. A fragile, US-brokered ceasefire has been in effect since October last year. But since then, Israel has killed at least 1,300 Palestinians in Gaza, bringing the genocide's death toll to over 73,651. Thousands more are missing and presumed dead under the rubble. International law News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

British MPs respond defiantly to Israel sanctioning them

S9

British MPs respond defiantly to Israel sanctioning them Submitted by Imran Mulla on Wed, 09/09/2026 - 10:54 Israel has banned 11 MPs from entering Israel in retaliation for the UK sanctioning illegal settlements Former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn speaks to supporters of Ben Jamal, director of Palestine Solidarity Campaign, at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London on 1 April 2026 (AFP) Off British MPs have reacted defiantly to the Israeli government banning them from entering the country in retaliation for the UK sanctioning illegal settlements on Tuesday. In a speech on Tuesday afternoon, Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Israel would close the British consulate in occupied East Jerusalem and remove British representatives from the International Gaza Support Center. He further announced an end to British training of Palestinian forces and a ban on 11 British MPs from entering Israel. The list includes former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, independent MP Zarah Sultana, Labour MPs Naz Shah, Diane Abbott, John McDonnell and Richard Burgon, and Green Party MPs Carla Denyer, Adrian Ramsay, Ellie Chowns, Sian Berry and Hannah Spencer. In addition, Israel banned the lawyer Fahad Ansari, who has worked on a case arguing for Hamas to be de-proscribed as a terror organisation in Britain. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said on Tuesday afternoon: "I have visited all parts of Palestine on several occasions, where I have witnessed the horrors of occupation, as well as the resilience and humanity of the Palestinian people. "They are the ones who suffer from Israel's apartheid. It is their freedom which is egregiously curtailed, alongside thousands of Palestinian refugees who are denied the right of return. " Corbyn added that "it is shocking that Israel continues to deny entry to UN investigators and international journalists. Israel doesn't want the world to see what it is doing - but we can never give up in our attempts to expose the truth". UK recognises 'ethnic cleansing' in West Bank, sanctions settlements and declares Israeli occupation illegal Read More » "That is the real scandal," he said. Labour MP Naz Shah said the selection of MPs banned "appears rather random and, frankly, bizarre". She added: "I am proud to support the UK Government's actions today, taken in line with our international legal obligations. " Shah said that her "commitment to international law, peace, security and the rights of both Palestinians and Israelis remains unchanged". On Tuesday, the British government recognised the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, declared the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory illegal and announced both comprehensive sanctions on Israeli settlements and a ban on all arms licences and other exports that "materially contribute to the occupation". France and Canada will also ban trade in settlement goods today, marking a significant diplomatic victory for the British government. 'We will not be bullied into silence' Labour MP Richard Burgon, a prominent campaigner in parliament for stronger action on Israel, said: "I’ve repeatedly called for sanctions on Israel over its war crimes and ethnic cleansing, including by providing evidence to the International Criminal Court. "The decision by the Israeli government to sanction me today will not intimidate me into silence. I will continue to do what is right, speak out in defence of international law and stand up for justice for the Palestinian people. " Meanwhile, independent MP Zarah Sultana, a former Labour MP who left the party under Keir Starmer's leadership last year in part because of it did not take stronger action on Israel's genocide in Gaza, said: "Israel has just banned me from entering. "Given that this is a fascist government presiding over genocide, apartheid and an illegal occupation, I’ll wear it as a badge of honour. " "I will not be intimidated into silence," Sultana said. "I will continue to speak out against Israel’s genocide and against the UK’s complicity. "If anything, this ban only strengthens my resolve to keep speaking out. " Analysis: Ed Miliband is becoming the UK's most formidable foreign secretary in decades Read More » All of the Green Party's MPs were banned by Israel. The Green Party has consistently called for sanctions on Israel, accused it of committing genocide in Gaza and backed the proscription of the Israeli military as a terrorist organisation. A Green Party spokesperson said: "We will not be bullied into silence by the Israeli government. We are proud of our MPs for standing up for Palestinian rights and demanding an end to British complicity in genocide and illegal occupation. "These threats only strengthen our resolve. The British government must stand firm and follow these overdue restrictions with a full arms embargo and wide-ranging sanctions. " Zack Polanski, the leader of the Green Party, added: "Our Green MPs have consistently spoken out and voted on the right side of history. "Standing up against ethnic cleansing, occupation and genocide, as all MPs should be doing. " Fahad Ansari, the lawyer on Israel's list of Britons, remarked: "I am neither British nor an MP but do take this as a badge of honour (although pretty sure I’m already a persona non grata in the apartheid state). " Ansari is Irish. Unlawful occupation Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said in parliament on Tuesday afternoon that "the official view of the British government is that the occupation is unlawful because of Israel's entrenchment of its control, its intention to extend permanent sovereignty and its expansionist agenda via illegal settlements". This means the UK has accepted the 2024 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, which said the occupation is unlawful and placed a duty on states to oppose it. Miliband said: "The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank perpetrated by settler terrorists. "And all too often, the Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this, and worse, members of it have made statements and taken actions to support the forced displacement of Palestinians. " Eleven other countries – Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden – signed a joint statement with Britain published on Tuesday, saying they "confirm their intention to introduce national and/or support European restrictions on trade in goods with settlements which are illegal under international law, or that they are actively considering these and other measures, in accordance with their national procedures". UK Politics 'Will not be intimidated': British MPs respond defiantly to Israel sanctioning them News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

9/11 at 25: Trump finds new targets for America's endless war on terror

S9

9/11 at 25: Trump finds new targets for America's endless war on terror Submitted by Belen Fernandez on Wed, 09/09/2026 - 11:37 For a quarter century, the US has drone-struck weddings, abducted and tortured people at black sites and blown up fishermen, spreading terror in the name of fighting it A screen grab from video posted by US Southern Command shows a US strike on a boat in the eastern Pacific, in which the military said two people were killed, on 23 January 2026 (AFP photo/US Southern Command's X account/Handout) Off On 11 September 2001, I was driving to work on the freeway in Austin, Texas when I heard the news on the radio that planes had crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. As I went about nearly crashing my own car while trying to phone my best friend in New York City, I remember thinking that we were going to be hearing a lot about this particular date for a long time to come. Sure enough, a quarter of a century has now passed since 9/11, and the events of that day continue to shape daily existence in the US - as trite as it sounds to say it. Those of us who are old enough may remember the pre-9/11 panorama, when it was still possible to go through airport security with your water bottle and shampoo and Muslims could go to mosque without being pursued by FBI informants. And while the US was never exactly all it was cracked up to be in terms of democracy and respect for basic rights, 9/11 definitively obliterated the right to privacy and other civil liberties upon which the country was supposedly founded. Obviously, the fallout of 9/11 was quite a bit more physically and psychologically catastrophic for many people beyond US borders - like the millions of humans from Afghanistan to Iraq and beyond who were killed, mutilated, irradiated and otherwise targeted by the so-called "global war on terror". Recall, too, the CIA's ritual torture at assorted international "black sites" and a certain infamous illegal US penal colony on occupied Cuban territory. Terrorism, defined It has become almost tiresome to have to repeat, time and again, that this alleged war on terror has itself constituted terrorism plain and simple - at least if we go by, say, the Cambridge Dictionary definition of the word: "violent action or threats designed to cause fear among ordinary people, in order to achieve political aims". It has become almost tiresome to have to repeat, time and again, that this alleged war on terror has itself constituted terrorism plain and simple Indeed, it goes without saying that the US military's habit of indiscriminate slaughter has done much to instil fear among ordinary people. Drone strikes on wedding parties are but one example of, um, "violent action". As per the official narrative, of course, the US is always and forever a victim of terrorism rather than its preeminent perpetrator - a line that is perennially propagated by a disgraceful corporate media establishment that declines under any circumstances to speak truth to power. To be sure, the US has gotten a run for its money on the whole terror-victimhood front from Israel, which refuses to cede its self-appointed position as number one victim of terrorism in the history of the world - and never mind its lengthy history of terrorising Palestinians. Predictably, Israel wasted no time in jumping on the post-9/11 "war on terror" bandwagon, paving the way for eventual all-out genocide in the Gaza Strip, which now proceeds apace with US backing and in spite of an ostensible ceasefire. Scared silly It bears mentioning that, in addition to sowing terror across the globe, the US government has done a bang-up job in causing fear among its own citizens to further political goals. In the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, ordinary people in the US were liable to believe that, if we didn't start blowing up other countries willy-nilly, we'd all be annihilated by anthrax-dispersing crop dusters or worse. Granted, George W Bush - on whose presidential watch 9/11 took place and who was thus in charge of leading the country to war - was not the most fear-inspiring warrior, perhaps due in part to his pathological inability to formulate proper sentences. Fortunately for the war effort, however, other more frightening characters had the president's back. These included the late Dick Cheney, Bush's vice president, who appeared on Foreign Policy magazine's 2012 list of the "Top 100 Global Thinkers" accompanied by the charming accolade: "If scaring us silly were a religion, Dick Cheney would be its high priest. " And while it is debatable whether scaring everyone silly should count as "great thinking", the post-9/11 bellicose thought process certainly worked well to justify all manner of government misdeeds at home and abroad and to generally solidify a global order predicated on the principle that the US can do whatever the hell it wants. Fast forward a quarter of a century, and current US warrior-in-chief Donald Trump has taken the tradition of doing whatever the hell one wants to another level with a manic foreign policy that is entirely unrestrained by international legal obligations or ethical concerns. From endeavouring to unleash the apocalypse on Iran to extrajudicially murdering fishermen and other folks in the Caribbean to kidnapping foreign heads of state and spontaneously renaming bodies of water, Trump has breathed new life into imperial impunity. The president has also expanded the purview of the "war on terror", such that the old "counterterror" mechanisms developed in the wake of 9/11 are now being wielded against undocumented immigrants and anyone else Trump doesn't like. And that, to put it mildly, should be more than enough to scare us all silly. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye. 9/11 Attacks Opinion Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:29 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Brent Oil Hits $100 as US-Iran War Shows Little Sign of Abating | The Opening Trade 9/9/2026

S9

Brent oil topped $100 a barrel for the first time since July, as attacks between the US and Iran and a recovery in Chinese oil buying propel the global crude benchmark higher. The US military destroyed five Iranian tankers carrying crude in response to attempts to hit a US Navy warship with ballistic missiles overnight, Central Command said. It’s the latest escalation in the conflict, which began in February and has disrupted some flows through the vital Strait of Hormuz. The Opening Trade has everything you need to know as markets open across Europe. With analysis you won't find anywhere else, we break down the biggest stories of the day and speak to top guests who have skin in the game. Hosted by Anna Edwards and Tom Mackenzie. (Source: Bloomberg)

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

South Koreans protest over possible plan to send forces to back US in Hormuz

S9

South Koreans protest over possible plan to send forces to back US in Hormuz Submitted by MEE staff on Wed, 09/09/2026 - 10:27 Iran warns South Korea that involvement would be treated as 'direct support for war of aggression' People protest against South Korea’s potential military involvement in US operations in the Strait of Hormuz, in Seoul on 9 September 2026 (Lillian Suwanrumpha/AFP) Off Protests have broken out in South Korea against government proposals to send its forces to back US operations in the Strait of Hormuz. Seoul said on Friday it was considering "contributions" to US security efforts along the strait, and on Tuesday sent what it called a fact-finding mission to the crucial waterway. Iran has already warned that any South Korean deployment would be "regarded as direct support for the party responsible for that aggression and will have serious consequences". Demonstrators gathered outside the US embassy in Seoul on Wednesday with placards urging the government not to join the "war of aggression" against Iran. Footage released on social media showed police pushing back dozens of protesters from the embassy. Jung Kyung-jik of the civic group People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy told AFP that he understood why Iran would see the intervention as a threat. "As Iran has said, the deployment of our troops to the region would amount to direct participation in an illegal war," he said. "There have been numerous violations of international law arising from US attacks on Iran, including the bombing of an elementary school and energy infrastructure. " Washington pressure South Korea has faced mounting pressure from Washington to join efforts around the Strait of Hormuz. US President Donald Trump previously blasted Seoul for not backing the US war on Iran and tied the spat to wider strains in the US-South Korea alliance. South Korea also depends heavily on the waterway for its energy supplies. South Korea confirms US moving air defence systems to the Middle East Read More » Last year, the country relied on shipments traversing Hormuz for 61 percent of its crude oil imports and 54 percent of its naphtha imports. Further options under consideration include deploying a P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft and a naval logistics support ship, a report by the Guardian said. South Korean broadcasters also reported that a navy explosive ordnance disposal team could be included. Any new deployment of military personnel would have to be reviewed by South Korea’s National Security Council, passed by a resolution of the cabinet and approved by the National Assembly, the presidential office said. Under pressure from Washington, South Korea expanded the deployment of an anti-piracy naval unit from Somalia to waters around the Strait of Hormuz in 2019. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung discussed the Strait of Hormuz with French President Emmanuel Macron on Tuesday, but the talks concerned possible contributions to international efforts to ensure security and freedom of navigation, not troop deployment, Seoul's presidential office said. War on Iran News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

'New escalation in Yemen deeply concerning everyone in the region'

S9

Oliver Farry is pleased to welcome Jules Grange Gastinel, Researcher at the Institute for Research and Studies on the Arab and Muslim World (IREMAM). He depicts Yemen as moving from a prolonged condition of unresolved conflict into renewed regional confrontation. The relative calm established after 2022, he argues, never amounted to a durable political settlement: Yemen remains divided between rival political, financial and military institutions.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

War in the Middle East: Iran attacks US base in Jordan, 10 US vessels

S9

Iran's Revolutionary Guards said Wednesday they pummelled a US military base in Jordan, vowing retaliation for American strikes on Iranian oil tankers that dragged the foes deeper into war. Tehran's bombs came after US forces destroyed five Iranian oil tankers on Tuesday in response to Iran targeting an American warship, the second such attack in less than a week. FRANCE 24's Reza Sayah reports from Tehran, Iran.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Netanyahu threatens legal action over Haaretz report on UAE warning before 7 October

S9

Netanyahu threatens legal action over Haaretz report on UAE warning before 7 October Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he has ordered his lawyers to take legal action against Haaretz, journalist Shlomi Eldar and “other individuals”. The newspaper reported that UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed warned Netanyahu of a potential Hamas attack before 7 October, but that the Israeli leader failed to inform the military and the Shin Bet security agency. Netanyahu rejected the account, saying his call logs and other records from the period contained no evidence of a conversation with the Emirati president. Haaretz says it stands by its reporting.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Russian drone strike near Ukraine-Moldova border kills at least two as Ukraine targets oil terminal

S8

An overnight Russian drone strike at a border crossing between Ukraine and Moldova killed at least two people, Odesa's regional governor said Wednesday. Moldovan Prime Minister Vasile Tofan said that 17 drones had hit Moldovan territory in August alone as both Kyiv and Moscow ramp up long-range strikes on military and energy infrastructure.

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Caught between US and Iran, South Korea weighs Hormuz role

S9

South Korea is inching closer to a potentially risky military role in the Strait of Hormuz after sending a fact-finding team to the Middle East, with Seoul weighing US pressure to contribute against the threat of Iranian retaliation. The mission underscores the dilemma Seoul faces over supporting a major security ally and avoiding being dragged into a conflict it did not start. Observers argue that any deployment should be delayed, limited and conducted through a broader coalition rather than...

Military · Geopolitical

⚔️

Exclusive: British Museum's Bayeux Tapestry sponsor backs Israeli defence tech fund

S9

Exclusive: British Museum's Bayeux Tapestry sponsor backs Israeli defence tech fund Submitted by Simon Hooper on Tue, 09/01/2026 - 07:52 Igor Tulchinsky's Tel Aviv-based venture capital fund is headed by a former general who has promoted remote-controlled weapons described by rights group as a 'tool for committing genocide' in Gaza Igor Tulchinsky, pictured behind King Charles and other dignitaries, at the British Museum's Bayeux Tapestry exhibition launch (The Trustees of the British Museum) Off At 10 am on Thursday, the British Museum will open its doors to the general public for the most hotly anticipated exhibition in its history: the return of the Bayeux Tapestry to England. Hundreds of thousands of visitors are expected to file past the fragile 70-metre-long artefact, which tells the story of the Norman conquest of England in 1066, during the next 11 months. Since 1931, British governments have tried to negotiate the loan of the Bayeux Tapestry from France, before it finally arrived amid tight security this summer. Tickets for the first four months of the exhibition, described as a "once-in-a-generation show", sold out within hours during the 273-year-old museum's single biggest day of sales. But much of this was made possible by the financial support of a billionaire benefactor whose name is on posters advertising the exhibition, and who kept a discreet profile at the official reception for the Bayeux Tapestry last week, standing near dignitaries including King Charles, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Andy Burnham as they pored over the medieval embroidery through its security glass. Igor Tulchinksy is the founder, chief executive and chair of a US -based investment firm, WorldQuant. In February, he was named as the sponsor of the Bayeux Tapestry exhibition, with media reports valuing the deal at £5m ($6.75m). Next month he is set to chair a fundraising ball at the museum “in recognition of his support for the Bayeux Tapestry”. But among Tuchinsky’s other business interests is a defence tech-focused venture capital fund based in Israel headed by a recently retired army commander who has promoted the use of remote-controlled vehicles in Gaza described by one rights group as a “direct tool for committing genocide”. The sponsorship deal predates WorldQuant Genesis, Tulchinsky’s new Tel Aviv-based fund, which was launched in April. And while at this stage the scale and precise nature of WorldQuant’s investment in defence technologies remains unclear, the revelations about Tulchinsky's business interests in Israel are likely to raise further questions for the museum, which has faced calls from MPs for an investigation into its removal of several references to Palestine in its galleries, as well as criticism over controversial sponsorship deals. Last week, the Guardian revealed that the museum gave a private view of the Bayeux Tapestry to Peter Thiel, the billionaire founder of Palantir, a tech firm that supplies the Israeli military with advanced AI and data-analysis software. Artists for Palestine UK, a network of artists and cultural workers, called the British Museum’s decision to partner with Tulchinsky “outrageous”. Neither the British Museum nor WorldQuant offered any response to Middle East Eye's multiple requests for comment for this article. WorldQuant Genesis is headed by Major General Saar Tzur, a senior former soldier who commanded the Israeli army’s Northern Corps and Manoeuvre Array - a military command structure designed to support ground forces tasked with advancing into and securing enemy-held territory - during the first year of the war in Gaza, where Israel is accused of waging a campaign of genocide against Palestinians, and operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon. From left: UK PM Andy Burnham, French President Emmanuel Macron and King Charles examine the Bayeux Tapestry at the British Museum in London on 2 September 2026 (AFP) Tzur was replaced in those roles in October 2024 and retired from the army shortly afterwards. He then joined the advisory board of Ottopia, a tech startup supplying the Israeli military with technology used to control unmanned vehicles remotely. In his work for Ottopia, Tzur has described the deployment of these vehicles as “ force multipliers ” in Gaza. “Teleoperation is essential for unmanned operations, enhancing ground superiority by reducing casualties, improving maneuver resilience, and boosting combat effectiveness,” he is quoted as saying on Ottopia’s website. Ottopia describes its technology as “battle proven” in roles including “direct combat” and “target engagement”. As well as advertising remote-control bulldozers, Ottopia's founder Amit Rosenzweig has also acknowledged the firm has supplied the Israeli military in Gaza with armoured personnel carriers (APCs) laden with explosives. "He or she can drink coffee while using a joystick to control a tank or an APC or whatever it is that he or she needs to control to get the job done," Rosenzweig said. Use of vehicles in Gaza The use of such remote-controlled vehicles by the Israeli army in Gaza and Lebanon has been linked by rights groups to indiscriminate attacks on civilians and the systematic demolition of buildings and neighbourhoods. According to Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, Israel began using explosive-laden remote-control vehicles in densely populated residential areas of Gaza in May 2024. Their use intensified in October 2024, as Israel implemented the so-called “Generals’ Plan”, which sought to depopulate northern Gaza and forcibly displace its residents. By August, September and October 2025, Euro-Med Monitor documented the destruction of approximately 300 residential units every day, with the Israeli military using about 15 exploding “robots” daily, amounting to an estimated 100 tonnes of explosives used against residential areas. Speaking to MEE in September 2025, residents of Gaza City described the explosions caused by the vehicles as “more devastating than air strikes”, with multi-storey buildings reduced to rubble in an instant. Many residents fled their neighbourhoods in terror, they said. “If the building were seven storeys high, it would become rubble. You can’t even tell there used to be a building there. Just tiny pieces of stone,” said Shabaan, a resident of eastern Gaza City. Genocide by remote control: Israel's explosive robots devastate Gaza Read More » Though the Gaza ceasefire agreement between the US, Hamas and Israel in October 2025 reduced or halted their use, Euro-Med Monitor has recorded an escalation of exploding vehicles in northern and eastern Gaza over the past two months. “For example, throughout August, we documented the detonation of around two to three remotely operated explosive vehicles per week in areas near the Yellow Line,” said Euro-Med Monitor’s Anas Jerjawi, referring to the demarcation line that Israeli forces are meant to have withdrawn behind. Jerjawi told MEE that the destruction of cultural heritage sites directly as a result of these vehicles has not yet been recorded. However, cultural heritage sites have been affected by Israeli military operations in areas where these explosive vehicles were deployed, including several places in Gaza City's Jabalia, such as the Old al-Omari Mosque, the Byzantine Church, al-Mathaf Hotel, al-Sheikh Saad Mosque and the Rajab Ibrahim Abedrabboh House and Shop. “What is clear is that the use of these weapons has taken place in and around densely populated areas containing homes, religious sites, and other elements of Gaza’s historic and cultural fabric,” Jerjawi said. “Their large-scale use has therefore posed a serious threat not only to civilian lives and residential structures, but also to the cultural heritage embedded within these communities. ” Euro-Med Monitor told MEE that it could not independently verify that the vehicles it had documented in Gaza were controlled using Ottopia's technology. But the vehicles identified in Gaza have a number of features in common with the type of remote-controlled vehicles described by Tzur and in the company's marketing material. An advertisement for the British Museum's Bayeux Tapestry exhibition on the wall of a London Underground station on 4 September 2026 (MEE) Ottopia's website features graphics of an APC-style autonomous vehicle. It describes its work with the Israeli army as enabling "fully unmanned ground operations, even with legacy vehicles". And in an article for the company, Tzur described how it had provided "teleoperation solutions for a wide variety of IDF vehicles - bulldozers, trucks, and more" following the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks and the start of the Gaza war. In Lebanon, whole towns and villages along the southern border have been intentionally razed by the Israeli military, including several heritage sites such as the Shrine of the Prophet Benjamin in Muhaibib. Though remote-control vehicles have been spotted in Lebanon, they have not yet been reported as used in the demolitions of Lebanese communities. Israel Katz, Israel’s defence minister, said the military is recreating the model of destruction in Gaza in southern Lebanon. Ottopia did not respond to MEE's multiple requests for comment. There is no suggestion of any association between Tulchinsky and Ottopia. 'Cultural genocide' In April, Israeli business newspaper Calcalist reported that Tulchinsky’s newly launched WorldQuant Genesis would fund “early-stage research companies combining AI, robotics, and biotechnology”. It said the fund had already invested in NavAiro, which it described as an “Israeli defense-tech start-up developing solutions to counter swarms of low-cost drones”. “Even against the backdrop of the complex reality, my commitment to Israel and its future remains intact,” Tulchinsky was quoted as saying. “Israel has an extraordinary combination of world-class universities, military experience and the ability to deal with a complex and challenging reality, which makes it one of the most fascinating places in the world for growth. ” Tulchinsky was born in Belarus under the Soviet Union but emigrated to the US as a child. He has longstanding business interests in Israel where WorldQuant has maintained an office in Ramat Gan, near Tel Aviv, since 2009. In an interview with the Jerusalem Post in March, Tulchinsky said he had provided financial support to the Israeli army since the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attacks and the start of the Gaza war, and said he visited the country regularly. “First I was helping the army financially,” he said. “I gave them money and they did whatever. ” Pressed by the interviewer for more details about the nature of his donations to the army, Tulchinsky said he had donated money through an organisation. 'How can the museum’s trustees possibly have come to the conclusion that Tulchinsky, with his links to the ongoing erasure of Gaza and parts of Lebanon, was a suitable sponsor? ' - Artists for Palestine UK In a statement to MEE, Artists for Palestine UK noted that remote-control bulldozers and exploding vehicles have contributed to the damage and destruction of more than 70 percent of Gaza’s total documented cultural heritage sites, including a Unesco World Heritage Endangered Site. “These mosques, shrines, historical houses, archaeological mounds and excavation sites, ancient artifacts, cemeteries, palaces, fortresses, mosaics, fountains, bathhouses, monasteries and churches were built by Palestinians, Romans, Egyptians, Greeks, Persians, Nabataeans, Assyrians and others over centuries,” it said. “Too many are now lost forever to the rubble in what a UN report states may amount to cultural genocide. ” The network noted that Tulchinksy appeared to be seeking to profit from Israeli military activities through his business interests in the country, and described his sponsorship of the Bayeux Tapestry exhibition as "shameful". “How can the museum’s trustees possibly have come to the conclusion that Tulchinsky, with his links to the ongoing erasure of Gaza and parts of Lebanon, was a suitable sponsor? And, more fundamentally, how are basic ethical standards, human rights and international law not guiding factors in such decisions, even before considerations of reputational damage? ” The British Museum has faced criticism and protests over previous corporate sponsorship deals, including a £50m ($67.5m) 10-year deal with oil giant BP to fund its “Masterplan” redevelopment project. Israel's genocide in Gaza Nick Hunt Daniel Hilton News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

← PreviousPage 17 of 319Next →